Saturday, September 02, 2006

Another Zionist conspiracy

Keeping It Quiet: The Israel Lobby's Crushing of Dissent by Charley Reese The first weapon of choice for the Israeli lobby when someone with prestige publishes a soundly researched paper or book critical of Israel or its powerful lobby is silence. If it's a book, it rarely gets reviewed; its author doesn't get interviewed. If it's a paper, there are no news stories in the big corporate press, no interviews with the authors, no television appearances. For the average American who depends on the press to tell him what's going on, it's as if the criticism never existed. The second weapon is, of course, to launch vicious personal attacks. Both methods are being used against an astounding paper titled "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy." It was written by two renowned academics, John J. Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago and Stephen M. Walt of the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. So far as I've been able to determine with the help of Google, while the paper and talk about it are all over the Internet, they are missing from the big corporate press as of this writing. It was published in the London Review of Books, and you can read it or download an edited version at There was one news story about it in the Christian Science Monitor and an attack on it by David Gergen in U.S. News & World Report. Gergen is editor at large of the magazine, which is owned by an ardent Zionist, Mortimer Zuckerman. Gergen is a professional spinmeister who has always served the people who have the butter for his bread.
The essence of the paper, which is thoroughly footnoted, is that Israel's lobby has so skewed American foreign policy in the Middle East that the U.S. places the security of Israel ahead of security for the United States. "This situation has no equal in American history," the authors state.

Nine out of nine MoveOn-ers agree with this.

By the way, "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" received a very glowing review (maybe from the cross being burned in the background) from David DuKKKe.

7 of 8 MoveOn-ers agree, a missile and not a plane took down the WTC

Fodder for the Jeff Rense Show:

Did Anyone Watch the AlteraVista tape Showing A Missle Hole Not An Airplane Shape into the Pentagon? And many other things from video and reporters as 9/11 was happening that it isn't what it looks like.

One thing is true that we Do know: American Citizens died as pawns. Let's get to the truth, however painful it is going to be to discover. Our nation's future depends on it.

Seven out of eight agree.

Why are the Jews so Jew-y? and please note the approval ratings.

Why are the Jews so Jew-y? Norwegian novelist Jostein Gaarder breaks the
ultimate taboo in an anti-Israel rant by tying the irrationality of Israeli violence to Judaism (the link is to an unofficial translation, which starts as follows):
“There is no turning back. It is time to learn a new lesson: We do no longer recognize the state of Israel. We could not recognize the South African apartheid regime, nor did we recognize the Afghan Taliban regime. Then there were many who did not recognize Saddam Hussein’s Iraq or the Serbs’ ethnic cleansing. We must now get used to the idea: The state of Israel in its current form is history.
We do not believe in the notion of God’s chosen people. We laugh at this people’s fancies and weep over its misdeeds. To act as God’s chosen people is not only stupid and arrogant, but a crime against humanity. We call it racism. There are limits to our patience, and there are limits to our tolerance. We do not believe in divine promises as justification for occupation and apartheid. We have left the Middle Ages behind. We laugh uneasily at those who still believe that the God of flora, fauna, and galaxies has selected one people in particular as his favorite and given it funny stone tablets, burning bushes, and a license to kill.
We call child murderers ‘child murderers’ and will never accept that such have a divine or historic mandate excusing their outrages. We say but this: Shame on all apartheid, shame on ethnic cleansing, shame on every terrorist strike against civilians, be it carried out by Hamas, Hizballah, or the state of Israel!”

…The Israelis are stealing their land, and have occupied land that is not theirs for years. And they OWN Washington senators and congresspeople.

29 of 30 Action Forum participants agree with this.

"Lack of American Jews serving in the US military"

34. Re: The Jews really do run everything! ;-)
A reply to: Bill Levinson,
Let us get back on the subject that began this confutation. We were discussing the lack of American Jews serving in the US military, benefits without responsibilities, media control etc. You sound like a Bushite who went into the military, National Guard, or Reserves and fled to Canada or went AWOL as Bush did during WAR. see:
(9) 77% AGREE

Jews, Christians no better than Islamofascists Action Forum calls Bush "Christo-Fascist" and Jews "Zio-fascist." A typical Ned Lamont supporter.

3. Moral Equivalency of Christo-fascists and Islamo-fascists
The point that I would like Red Amerika to understand is that Christo-fascism, as practiced by the Bush administration, is the moral equivalent of Zio-fascism and Islamic fascism. The three faiths of Abraham are based on the same creation myths set forth in the same specious form - an Inerrant Text - and adherents to those creeds have proved by their dismal track records of oppression and intolerance that the Abrahamaic value system has no place in what should be A Secular World Order. Would that it were true that the Abrahamaic ideologies of perpetual victimization and trimphalism were merely "the opiate of the people" - that would be an improvement over the actual status quo! While Bushco's intellectual and moral capacities might be opiated by their faith, their capacity for destruction is undiminished.

Friday, September 01, 2006 Black and Muslim soldiers should "refuse to support" US

We have encountered a problem in documenting permanent links to shorter postings at's Action Forum (which do not have permanent links) but we discovered the virtues of Google Cache in providing verifiable records. Here are some real winners to occupy your Labor Day weekend. (You may have to reassemble these rather-long URLs but it is worth it.)

I ask that the UN investigate and bring appropriate charges against Bush and this administration. I demand that Congress and the UN fully investigate this administration and not allow another invasion to occur without UN sanction. This occupation must end now. The UN must take control now not later. Congress must act now. The UN must perform its duties now before dictators such as Bush achieve his goal of Caucasians ruling the world. If help is not received from Congress and the UN, I ask that the Civil Rights Organizations, Black and Muslim religious organizations, join with me in asking all Black and Muslim soldiers and civilians to refuse to support this illegal occupation of Iraq by this 'son of a bush'. See:

7 out of 9 agree

Note how this individual supports George Soros' goal of putting the UN in charge of the United States. Maybe this individual IS George Soros, posting under another name.

I, whose son served in Afghanistan and Iraq, wish Cindy could tell Bush what I have written and wish I could tell him face to face. I believe him to be an unethical liar who never should had been put in the position he is so unqualified for, and he is an embarrassment to most people in the US, and most all people in the World. He should be impeached as I have said in the past, he should have sent his daughters to war instead of my son, he should never ask a Black to risk his or her life to offer democracy to Iraq's that Blacks will never achieve during his regime in this country. He should be tried for war crimes as he is advocating for Sadam Hussen. The same treatment Sadam receives should be the same he should get for his past and present crimes against humanity prior to the unlawful invasion of Iraq. I would ask Cindy to tell Bush that he and his regime would be doing the world a favor if they would leave
office immediately. Again I state that neither Bush nor any president should ask any" BLACK in this racist country to risk his life or to be put in harms way, due to the manner in which blacks have and are yet being denied equal opportunities in this racist society. While speaking to him you must realize that due to his intellect he will most likely have to consult with his advisor, Carl Rove, also called by Bush "TURD SMASHER", to give you a somewhat intelligent answer to my statements which I want you to present on my behalf. Thanks for your involvement in a cause all reasonable Americans should support.

32 out of 35 agree

Bring Black Troops home/send bush's daughters
To serve in the US to protect the homeland and our human rights, being violated by the Bush Regime. I recently spoke to an African American Marine Officer, who was disturbed about how Black Marines are being treated prior and during Bush’s illegal occupation of Irag. He related to me that if it wasn’t for the low ranking Black Marines who were being discriminated against, and he felt they needed his help, he himself would resign. For this and other reasons Blacks serving in the armed services should not become solders of fortune, but instead should be assigned to protect the human rights of African Americans, and all people regardless of color or faith. This country should also realize why Blacks are not obligated to shed blood for this country. They will not be able to share in the spoils and benefits if any are derived from this invasion, and others. They nor their love ones in their life time will receive equal opportunities in this country. For Blacks to receive the discipline basically the military have to offer, and minorities are so much in need, I would suggest that they recruit Blacks, keep them in safe positions state side and not allow them a weapon, because they may use it against those they perceive to be their enemy.

10 out of 13 agree

The United States has to be the worst violator of human rights in the world because of their treatment of AFRICAN AMERICANS in this Country!!


5 out of 5 agree

With all this talk of aiding and abetting the enemy, it's easy to forget who the enemy really is. The Iraqis and even the Afghans have done nothing to us. As for Bin Laden, he is from Saudi Arabia and he has been created by this country.
There is no way we are aiding the enemy unless we support Bush and his gang who have started an illegal war and decided to call the Iraqis "enemies", the same way the Iranians will be the "enemies" of tomorrow when Bush decides to start another illegal war against them.

As for those who think that this country needs Israel because of Israel's "efficiency" in the so-called war on terror, they forget that if it weren't for this country's total support of Israel, it would never have been targeted by so-called terrorists. Has Canada ever been targeted by terrorists?

8 out of 9 agree

(To answer the above question, the answer is "Yes." Same for Germany and the Netherlands, which are not known for their support of Israel.)

Thursday, August 31, 2006 U.S. collaborated in 9/11 terrorism

9/11 truthseeker

Original Post: "...osama bin ladin, the man responsible for the horror, was still walking around scot free while we are in iraq killing thousand of people who had nothing to do with it. whats wrong with this picture? - b. mathews, retired (August 31, 2006; las vegas, NV)"

My Post: I understand your frustration. What's wrong with this picture is that Osama could have been found, but they're not actually trying to find him. Osama was a patsy for a "false flag" operation perpetrated by some element of the U.S. government. How could Osama Bin-Laden cause NORAD to stand down? How can Al-Qeida conduct war game excersises with our fighter jets who on the morning of 9/11 were engaged in drills involving hijacked airliners?

I recommend that you watch another documentary on 9/11 called "Loose Change". It has been viewed by at least ten million people on Google video. You can watch it for free, and it could change the world, if you're ready.

Scores (4) 100% AGREE

Re: 9/11 for b. matthews

In your post you asked "What's wrong with this picture" in regard to the continuing situation in Iraq etc.

I'll tell you "Everything is wrong with the 9/11 attack from start to finish."

I know just a wee bit about national defense and had more than a few questions I shot back to Washington starting with:

Where in heck were all the civilian FAA and military radar air traffic controllers after that first plane hit the first tower? Asleep? Dead? Why did no alert go out to the aircraft/missile defense system command center?

Where in heck was the Eastern Seaboard Air Defense System duty ready aircraft, some of which are supposed to be in the air 24 hours a day on rotating shifts...JUST IN CASE a sneak attack from a surface ship, submarine, or long range bomber ocurred? Were all these people asleep at the switch too?

How long was it after the first plane hit the first WTC tower and the second plane hit the second tower...20 minutes...30 minutes????....far too long for an ALERT not to be issued and interceptor aircraft launched all up and down the eastern seaboard from Maine to Florida, that's for sure.....JUST IN CASE.....of a sneak attack.

Then what about the plane crashing into the one the most highly populated and protected metropolitan areas in the world?

Where is one single tourist Polaroid pic, one tourist Kodak Brownie snapshot, one single cell of tourist or news reporter video tape that shows a low flying Boeing 757 Jet Airliner in one of the most filmed and video taped cities in the world. Were all these people asleep as well? Dumbstruck?

Why did the Pentagon parking lot camera first show just fire erupting in 2001 and nothing else, and then four years later in 2006 show a blurry streak alleged to be the airliner.

Why have there not been but few socalled "eye witnesses" come forward and why weren't they being interviewed on national TV news shows or on documentary channels like Discovery, National Geographic, The Military Channel as examples for capturing Nobel Prizes. Why didn't liberal CNN, coservative FOX or any other news network channel's hotshot investigative reporters chase all those eye witnesses down?

Why wasn't the Washington D C air/missile defense system alerted after a half hour after the fact of the first TC tower being stuck and shoot down that 4th airliner before it got within 10 miles of the Pentagon, Capitol, White House, etc. Were all these people asleep too? There are only about 30 Airforce bases within 20 minutes or less flying time from the nation's capitol city as well as about the same number of overlapping radar intercept stations.

Why was george walker bush conveniently in Florida instead of Washington "ON THAT ONE PARTICULAR DAY OUT OF THE YEAR TERRORISTS DECIDED TO ATTACK?" I have a feeling that terrorists smart enough to carry out such an attack, were smart enough to know whether the president was in town or not, even if it had not been announced publically that bush would be in Florida.

Yessir b. matthews...I have a lot of questions...and all of them are unanswered.

9 100% Agree

Wednesday, August 30, 2006 loves Al Jazeera

Seen on 30 August 2006:

AIPAC Influenced Pro-Israel Pro-War PAC Contributions to 2006 Congressional
Send them packing this November. There is an alternative...
See the Stop AIPAC site…
FOX and CNN 24 / 7 propaganda machines are undermining
objective media.
Take action: Call your cable provider and tell them to
carry the Al Jazeera Channel on “basic cable”.
“If everybody watches CNN,
what does CNN watch? The Al Jazeera Channel.” Friends of AlJazeera Bush administration perpetrated 9/11

20. Get the truth out on 9/11
The attack on 9/11 was the worst crime that this administration has perpetrated on America. This crime was so blatant and the evidence of government involvement and cover-up is so abundant, that if we can just find the courage within ourselves to set aside our knee-jerk reaction to the word "conspiracy” and just look at the evidence, we will find that we have in front of us the biggest smoking gun there is to put these criminals in jail where they belong. A good place to start is Or, if you have broad-band, go to and watch the video free online, or you can order the DVD. Take courage.

Scores (13) 71% AGREE

"Whining, arrogant Jew" Tom Lantos

I do not personally care for Tom Lantos because of his political positions and would probably vote against him. This, however, is how forum participants disagree with legislators' positions.


Congressman Tom Lantos told PM Olmert of Israel that he wants to freeze the $ 230 million U.S. aid package to Lebanon. Lantos is the ranking democrat on the House Foreign Relations Comte. Lantos said, "The [Lebanese] aid package should be witheld until the Lebanese government displays responsibility". Responsibility ? Israel is guilty of war crimes in their cowardely attack on Lebanon and the whining, arrogant Jew wants Lebanon to demonstrate responsibility ! This is another example of how many Jews/Zioniosts in our Congress use the U.S. for their own greedy purposes. DUMP ISRAEL.

Scores (14) 84% AGREE

Jews Don't Serve

About 10 years ago, AOL was infested with Neo-Nazis. AOL tolerated chat room names "Lynch a Nigger" and "Gas a Jew".

One Neo-Nazi scum said Jews don;t fight for the country. I was livid and told her:

My father enlisted in the Marines in 1942 with 3 children and a fourth on the way.

My wife's brother fought in the Battle of the Bulge.

One of my mother's brother served in ground crew in Italy.

All of my brother's in law (total of 4) where in the army or air force reserve.

All my mail cousins and I were in the army or air force reserve. One served on active duty int he Navy.

I am really tired of defending myself against these slime bags who rarely served in the military.

The Best of's Action Forum

Note not only the content of these postings but the overwhelming support from other Action Forum members. We wonder if the following writer refers to police officers as "pigs" when he is talking to his friends.

73. Bush is Anti-Black & Muslim” and too “PRO-ISREAL”

The Jews don’t deserve a State, and are less deserving than African Americans. The Jews are receiving African Americans’ “REPRARATION” in the form of foreign aid.

At least Israel requires that their youth serve in the military. This administration and its COWARDS find all the loop holes in order that they and their Caucasians Love Ones do not have to serve. When the Reserves and National Guard were considered safe havens, these units were ‘reserved’ for Caucasians. African Americans were delegated to Cooks, Mechanics etc., with little chance of advancement. Now we send our Reserves and National Guard to Muslim countries with the pretense that we want to create freedom for Muslims. These units consist of Police Officers and other Racist individuals who have since the founding of America, have discriminated and violated the rights of minorities in this country. See:

In my opinion it is OK

Scores (10) 70% AGREE

83. Sofia I think– Professional Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7
…Firefighters were told to move away from the building moments before it collapsed. In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties’ estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. So: This building’s collapse resulted in a profit of about $500 million!

Scores (11) 81% AGREE


91. Defend against the Terrorist Threat

The Terrorist Threat is the Neocons. Every time you hear the word “terrorist”, your mind should picture the Neocons.

Scores (30) 91% AGREE


"Neocons" is a politically-correct code word for "Jooooooooooooz." Let's see; they don't like Jews, police officers, Negroes, or Republicans. Maybe they can get together and burn a cross. MoveOn-endorsed Senate candidate Robert Byrd doubtlessly knows where to find some sheets and kerosene for the cross. “Republicans, Israelis, and Blacks”

Or should it be, "Republicans, Jews, and Negroes" (with "Negroes" not being exactly the word he uses) as this individual probably says in private discussions with his friends?

Please read this posting very carefully before you get your 'shorts' all bunched up! If you want to deliberately miss the point -- that's O K -- not everyone is ready to take a look at their real self.

What do they all have in common?

They all yell bloody murder when anyone says anything that they think is directed at their society. If you attack anyone in their society, they think that they might be next. The problem is, is that they mentally identify themselves, as part of a particular group and not part of the whole! They seek safety in the group just as untrained Infantry will "bunch up" when frightened.

Truth has nothing to do with it -- they all scream at the same time -- the Republicans will unite, and scream, whenever anyone outside there own party challenges their base! The Blacks will scream and play the race card anytime one of their own is singled out! (How many will still proclaim OJ's innocence?) Israel will play the Holocaust card and scream in unison when Israel is shown to be less than perfect!

With Israel and Blacks, this is their way of preventing any chance of the past injustices being repeated! They are still afraid that the past may repeat itself if they don't "stick together"! Its their defence against admitting one of their own could be wrong. Most of the Jewish people in the United States support Israel about the same way we support this country. We can acknowledge and criticize our own country's many mistakes. We can express our 'outrage' of what is going on, but when an 'outsider' criticizes this country, we rise up as one to defend the United States!

We defend this country because we see this country as it should be, not as it is! We refuse to take responsibility for who and what we really are as a country. After all we didn't vote for this administration and we think it very unfair when anyone includes us in their criticism of what this country is doing! Its the old story we judge ourselves by our intentions while judging others by what they do!

I think a good example of this is when that British newspaper ran that headline when Bushit was re-elected! "How could 50 some million people be so stupid?" [Answer: we didn't want a Soros-backed agent like John Kerry.] ...'s finest: "Jews don't serve in US Army"

Quoted directly from a Action Forum entry. It's hard to distinguish it from the kind of stuff you might find at National Vanguard or a similar white supremacist Web site.


4. Rather than AFRICAN AMERICANS……

American JEWS should serve in the US Army. RUMSFELD should bring OUR TROOPS HOME, REPLACE WITH JEWS!!! Prior to further support of ISREAL, a state (US controlled) who discriminates against Blacks and Muslims. We should insist that the American JEWS serve in the US Army to protect their selfish interest. They used lies to sell this war to the public so that JEWS and super-rich corporations could get even richer by securing multi-billion dollar contracts in Iraq even while our soldiers were engaged in active combat. A disproportionate number of our soldiers are minorities. They and their families will never benefit from the profits of war. … See:


The fact is that Jewish-Americans make up 2% of our American population and less than 1% of the world’s population and yet hold exponentially more positions of real power in American than Asian-Americans (4% of our population) and African-Americans (12% of our population) and Hispanic Americans (13% of our population)… are Jewish people really so much smarter and so much more talented that they truly deserve so much more REPRESENTATION in our democracy than all the other minority groups, even though they are far fewer in number than these other minority groups??? Can someone please explain to me again the concept of DEMOCRACY? Isn’t it about all the people being FAIRLY REPRESENTED in our government??? Jewish-Americans should make up approximately 2% of our government and Asian-Americans should make up about 4% and African-Americans should make up about 12% and Hispanic-Americans should make up about 13% and ALL OF THESE MINORITIES SHOULD GET EQUAL TREATMENT UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION — I even believe strongly in AFFIRMATIVE ACTION for minorities — but I do not believe it’s healthy or at all DEMOCRATIC for 2% of our population to control our CONGRESS (through AIPAC), our MEDIA, and our MONEY. It’s just UNAMERICAN! I also believe WOMEN should make up AT LEAST HALF our representatives in government. Call me crazy (though I know you’ll just call me ANTISEMITIC)!

7 70% Agree
3 30% Disagree

MoveOn's “Media owning Jewish pigs” and “sneaky Jewish sympathizers”

The following speaks for itself. Click on the link for the complete article; only a "fair use" excerpt appears here.
Donkey see, monkey do

By Robert Goldberg
August 29, 2006

But [Pat Buchanan] never called them "Media owning Jewish pigs" or "sneaky Jewish sympathizers!" Both can be found repeatedly on the Action Forum.
Moveon is not the only leftist Web site filled with anti-Semitism. But compared to the Dailykos and the slanderous Huffington Post nothing compares to Moveon in terms of quantity or viciousness.
After Sen. Joe Lieberman lost the Democratic primary in Connecticut, one Moveon member stated: "Jew Lieberman first step. Corporate Clinton will be next. Impeachment of BushCo will be third." This one came in with 95 percent of Moveon members responding approving the "Jew Lieberman" post. (Moveon helpfully records the percent of people agreeing with each post.) compares Israelis to Nazis, calls Bush a “war criminal”

Examples of anti-American and anti-Semitic postings on, which are not removed by the moderators (posts objecting to this sort of thing WERE removed) and with which the vast majority of forum registrants agree.

Israel’s ‘UNINTENDED’ ??? collateral damage in Lebanon

Unintended for crisake. They bombed the whole country back to the Stone Age. It is A WAR CRIME for which Nazis were hung. If I were Bush I would not plan any European vacations.

Bush Goes Retro to Avoid Prosecution - by Paul Craig Roberts

When I was a kid, John Wayne war movies gave us the message that America was the good guy, the white hat that fought the villain. Alas, today the U.S. and its last remaining non-coerced ally, Israel, are almost universally regarded as the bad guys over whom John Wayne would triumph. Today, the U.S. and Israel are seen throughout the world as war-criminal states.

On Aug. 23, the BBC reported that Amnesty International has brought war crimes charges against Israel for deliberately targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure as an “integral part” of Israel’s strategy in its recent invasion of Lebanon.

Israel claims that its aggression was “self-defense” to dislodge Hezbollah from southern Lebanon. Yet, Israel bombed residential communities all over Lebanon, even Christian communities in the north in which no Hezbollah could possibly have been present.

United Nations spokesman Jean Fabre reported that Israel’s attack on civilian infrastructure annihilated Lebanon’s development: “Fifteen years of work have been wiped out in a month.”

Israel maintains that this massive destruction was unintended “collateral damage.”

President Bush maintains that Israel has “a right to protect itself” by destroying Lebanon.

Bush blocked the attempt to stop Israel’s aggression and is, thereby, equally responsible for the war crimes. Indeed, a number of reports claim that Bush instigated the Israeli aggression against Lebanon.

Bush has other war crime problems. Benjamin Ferencz, a chief prosecutor of Nazi war crimes at Nuremberg, recently said that President Bush should be tried as a war criminal side-by-side with Saddam Hussein for starting aggressive wars, Hussein for his 1990 invasion of Kuwait and Bush for his 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Under the Nuremberg standard, Bush is definitely a war criminal. The U.S. Supreme Court also exposed Bush to war crimes charges under both the U.S. War Crimes Act of 1996 and the Geneva Conventions when the Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld against the Bush administration’s military tribunals and inhumane treatment of detainees.

…According to President Bush, the U.S. will lose the “war on terror” unless the U.S. succeeds in defeating “the Iraqi terrorists” by establishing “democracy in Iraq.” Of course, insurgents resisting occupation are not terrorists, and there were no insurgents or terrorists in Iraq until Bush invaded. [Michael Moore’s position, the terrorists who are murdering our troops with improvised explosive devices are “freedom fighters.”] …

Total number of responses: 15
14 93% Agree

1 6% Disagree


Here are some more entries at today’s action (Aktion?) forum. These are too short to have permanent link entries.

When Israeli forces attacked Lebanon, they may have made the largest civil case in history possible if not probable.. The action of the Hezbollah was NOT an action perpetrated by the govenment of Lebanon. The response by Israel was. The Lebanese people have cause for civil action against the government of Israel. In a class action suit in Internatinal Court, the case against Israel is a “slam dunk”. Billions of dollars in losses is directly the responsibility of the Israeli government. Will it happen…….we’ll see.


9. American Jews have the advantage of dual citizenship.

African Americans, and too many of our troops are being maimed and dying in IRAQ in a civil war, while American Jews are allowed to have the advantage of dual citizenship. Many who feel an obligation to serve in Israel’s Military, and no obligation to serve in the US MILITARY. This is shameful, especially when it is apparent that one reason we invaded IRAQ was to protect ISRAEL.

The beneficiaries of this invasion of IRAQ should suffer the consequences of the INVADERS. AFRICA AMERICANS, THE POOR and others who will never benefit from the booty of this invasion should not suffer the consequences of Bush’s War.

Innocent IRAQI’s, all African Americans, and too many of our troops are being maimed and dying in IRAQ in a civil war, created by an illegal occupation. An occupation created by an administration consisting of DRAFT DODGERS, a President? (Bush) who apparently went AWOL and refused to serve.

Innocent people are dying, supported by a Congress who many have refused to serve in our military, and refuse to re-institute the draft, fearing their love ones will suffer the consequences of their and Bush’s criminal acts.
Scores (4) 100% AGREE


14. Payments to Israel

US sends money to Israel, Israel bombs Lebanon, then US pays Lebanon to rebuild.

What’s wrong with this picture ?

Scores (18) 94% AGREE

46. The Obvious

The whole nation saw the twin towers collapse on 911 exactly as they would with controlled demolition. What about the third tower, not strucked by an airplane?

The sad truth of it is that people are being hypnotized to not believe the obvious. Big Brother will decide for you what is obvious.

Our present Emporer and his ilk may not have read “Mein Kampf”, but they most certainly read “1984″. The Emporer has also read “My Pet Goat”, as in creating scapegoats.

I think “1984″ should be required reading for anyone who wants to wake up to the reality of our times.

Scores (6) 83% AGREE

61. US will not invade LEBANON !! , NO OIL

What the HEZBOLLAH have to realize is that they don’t have to worry about the US invading and occupying LEBANON. The US military lack minorities to feed to the fodder, with African Americans leaving the military in droves, due to the illegal occupation of IRAQ. American JEWS refuse to serve in the US Military, so you don’t have to worry about them. Since LEBANON lack large deposits of oil you can be assured that these Conservatives Cowards will never risk life and limb of the Reserves and National Guard consisting of Caucasians and their loves ones to invade a country without oil reserves. I suggest that you tell the US led TERRORIST to tend to their affairs, while HEZBOLLAH protect LEBANON in order to keep principles and morals lacking in America. See:

Scores (12) 83% AGREE

Ten out of twelve MoveOn Action Forum regulars agree that "American JEWS refuse to serve in the US Military." Well, American JOOOOOOZ should remember this when they see MoveOn-supported candidates like Ned Lamont, Robert Byrd, and Robert Casey on the ballots this November.'s candidates is a list of political candidates who have been endorsed by While candidates have no control over who endorses them, they have complete control over whether they accept the endorsements-- whether from racists and anti-Semites like Al "Bloodsucking Jews and white interlopers" Shaprton (aka David Duke in Blackface) or SOG (Soros-Occupied Government). As far as we know, none of these candidates has refused or disowned's endorsement.

Ned Lamont (D-CT)
Patrick Murphy for U.S. Congress (PA-08)
Diane Farrell for U.S. Congress (CT-04)
Former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd for U.S. Senate (WV)
“My old mom told me, ‘Robert, you can’t go to heaven if you hate anybody.’ We practice that. There are white niggers. I’ve seen a lot of white niggers in my time. I’m going to use that word. We just need to work together to make our country a better country, and I’d just as soon quit talking about it so much.”
Bob Casey for U.S. Senate (PA)
Nick Lampson for U.S. Congress (TX-22)
Sherrod Brown for U.S. Senate (OH)
Francine Busby for U.S. Congress (CA-50)
Bill Nelson for U.S. Senate (FL)

Bob Casey, who is running against Rick Santorum in a hotly-contested race here in Pennsylvania, is nominally a moderate Democrat for whom we could have easily voted had we not discovered his connection to George Soros’ shadow government: the metastasizing cancer that is infesting the Democratic Party. The Democrats must excise Soros and like cancer or gangrene unless they want to continue to empower the Republicans to put up and win with mediocre candidates. While George Bush may not be the brightest bulb in the chandelier, he is infinitely preferable to a Soros-supported candidate like John Kerry who (like Ned Lamont) consorts openly with prominent racists and anti-Semites like Al Sharpton. A turnip would be preferable to Kerry or Lamont, because at least it would not be disloyal to the United States nor would it stand arm in arm with racists and anti-Semites of the worst sort:

As it happens, the London arrests came almost exactly 24 hours after antiwar candidate Ned Lamont, flanked by Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, claimed victory over Sen. Joseph Lieberman in the Connecticut Democratic primary.

Yes, flanked by Mr. “Bloodsucking Jews” Sharpton and Mr. “Hymietown” Jackson themselves. The fact that Lamont tolerates Sharpton’s mere presence shows beyond any doubt what he is, and the fact that both have apparently accepted’s endorsement disqualifies both from any position of trust or responsibility.

To recap, George Soros blames Israel for fomenting anti-Semitism (i.e. the same kind of drivel that can be found on white supremacist Web sites) while calling the United States a threat to world peace. It is necessary to question the very loyalty to the United States of any candidate who accepts support from George Soros or, which Soros played a major role in founding. As an example
Soros, who has financed efforts to promote open societies in more than 50
countries around the world, is bringing the fight home, he said. On Monday, he and a partner committed up to $5 million to, a liberal activist group, bringing to $15.5 million the total of his personal contributions to oust Bush.

Tuesday, August 29, 2006; Please Move On! (And out of the US) first came to our attention because of its connection with George Soros, apparently as a legal way for Soros to legally bypass campaign spending limits and use his millions to elect candidates like John Kerry and now Ned Lamont (D-CT), Bob Casey (D-PA), and Robert Byrd (KKK-WV). Lamont has underscored the character and integrity of the typical MoveOn candidate by consorting openly with Al Sharpton, a well-known racist and anti-Semite: David Duke in blackface.

The number of anti-American and anti-Semitic postings on's action forum have risen to the point where it is difficult to record all of them on our Web sites and regular news blogs. We have accordingly created this blog to allow a permanent record to be made of MoveOn's commentary on "Jew Lieberman" as they call Mr. Lamont's opponent.'s anti-Semitic and anti-American commentary cannot, however, be blamed on individuals who happen to log into their discussion forum. First, the moderators can apparently take posts offline but they choose not to do so. Second, such postings gain widespread support from other regulars. Third, the following was created by staff and not forum visitors. We have downloaded a complete copy of this page in case MoveOn takes it down.

MoveOn BulletinFriday, May 9, 2003 Noah T. Winer, Editor

SPECIAL FEATURE: INTERVIEW SENATOR BYRDThis week, we kick off a feature of the new MoveOn Bulletin: the Grassroots Interview. In each issue, we'll
provide an opportunity for MoveOn members to ask five questions of a prominent political figure. U.S. Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV) has graciously agreed to be the first subject. Senator Byrd has been in the news recently for his comments on President Bush's "victory" speech. What are your questions for Senator Byrd?

(1) Did you lynch any Negroes when you were a Kleagle of the Ku Klux Klan?
(2) What is your sheet size?
(3) What is your favorite fluid for igniting a cross?
(4) What do you REALLY think of African-Americans?
(5) How do you align the holes in your pillowcase with your eyes?

PAX ISRAELICA? Nearly all PNAC participants, whether Jewish or
Christian, are right-wing Zionists who support Ariel Sharon's Likud Party
. In 1996, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and others drafted a paper for incoming Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urging him to make "a clean break" from the Oslo peace process preferring "peace through strength," including the ouster of Saddam Hussein. This essay describes many of the familiar neo-conservatives as having "dual loyalties," making policy decisions in the interests of the State of Israel as much as the United States.

It speaks for itself and the rest of this blog will simply reinforce our perception of