Saturday, April 21, 2007

Al Sharpton the Racist Poo and his National Action Network

Al Sharpton the Racist Poo (with due credit to South Park's Mr. Hanky for the idea) meets his white counterpart, Kleagle the Racist Poo. Kleagle is upset because Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards, Bill Richardson, Joe Biden, and Chris Dodd won't accept his invitation to meetings of the Ku Klux Klan and White Aryan Resistance, although they did go to Sharpton's National Action Network meeting.

A World Without Hate Groups (Al Sharpton's National Action Network)

(You may need to click on the animation to make it work)
Al Sharpton and the National Action Network = Tom Metzger and the White Aryan Resistance
Fred Siegel's outstanding Democrats Embrace 'Impresario of Hatred'
It would have taken no great effort for the reporters covering the Apollo debate to have walked across 125th Street from the theater to visit Freddy's Fashion Mart, where in 1995 eight people died in a murderous rampage inspired by Mr. Sharpton. Mr. Sharpton is best-known for the Tawana Brawley hoax, in which he insisted that a 15-year-old black girl had been abducted and raped by a band of white men practicing Irish Republican Army rituals. In fact she had made up the story to protect herself from her violent stepfather. But at Freddy's, Mr. Sharpton was even more malevolent. He turned a landlord-tenant dispute between the Jewish owner of Freddy's and a black subtenant into a theater of hatred. Picketers from Mr. Sharpton's National Action Network, sometimes joined by "the Rev." himself, marched daily outside the store, screaming about "bloodsucking Jews" and "Jew bastards" and threatening to burn the building down. After weeks of increasingly violent rhetoric, one of the protesters, Roland Smith, took Mr. Sharpton's words about ousting the "white interloper" to heart. He ran into the store shouting, "It's on!" He shot and wounded three whites and a Pakistani, whom he apparently mistook for a Jew. Then he set the fire, which killed five Hispanics, one Guyanese and one African-American--a security guard whom protesters had taunted as a "cracker lover." Smith then fatally shot himself.

http://www.nationalreview.com/20Mar00/nordlinger032000.html adds, ed, ...But the torching, so to speak, continued. In 1995-four years into the putative New Sharpton-there was another, fatal case in which Sharpton had a guilty hand: Freddy’s Fashion Mart. In Harlem, a white store owner — no, worse: a Jewish one — was accused of driving a black store owner out of business. At one of the many rallies meant to scare the Jewish owner away [can anyone say, "burning crosses meant to scare the Negro owner away?"], Sharpton charged that “there is a systemic and methodical strategy to eliminate our people from doing business off 125th Street. I want to make it clear . . . that we will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business.” Sharpton’s colleague, Morris Powell, said of the Jewish owner — Sharpton’s “white interloper” — “We’re going to see that this cracker suffers. Reverend Sharpton is on it.”

Friday, April 20, 2007

Al Sharpton Morphs with Tom Metzger

Except for skin color, is there any real difference between them?
(You may need to click on the image to see the animation)

National Jewish Democratic Council Lies about Partial Birth Abortion Ban

http://njdc.typepad.com/njdcs_blog/2007/04/democratic_cand.html

As NJDC Blog readers are undoubtedly aware, the Supreme Court launched an assault on choice yesterday, upholding legislation which bans third trimester abortions without offering protections for the life and health of the mother. Both of Bush's new right wing justices voted for the ban (in a 5-4 decision).

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00001531----000-.html


(a) Any physician who, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly performs a partial-birth abortion and thereby kills a human fetus shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both. This subsection does not apply to a partial-birth abortion that is necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, physical illness, or physical injury, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself. This subsection takes effect 1 day after the enactment.

Res Ipsa Loquitur, "the thing speaks for itself"


UPDATE 23 APRIL 2007
Honor and fairness require us to report this update from NJDC's blog:
http://njdc.typepad.com/njdcs_blog/2007/04/correction_to_b.html
While I was correct in asserting that the ban does NOT offer "health of the mother" protections -- and a strong case can be made that this put's a woman's life in danger -- the Washington Post reports the following: "It [the ban] does, however, provide an exception to save the woman's life."

Thursday, April 19, 2007

Al Sharpton: the Democrats' Tom Metzger



Q: What is the difference between Tom Metzger (Aryan Nations, Ku Klux Klan, White Aryan Resistance) and Al Sharpton (National Action Network)?

A: Tom Metzger was never invited to be a keynote speaker at the Democratic National Convention (Kerry, 2004) or campaign with Ned Lamont. Nor did Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Bill Richardson, Chris Dodd, John Edwards, and Joe Biden agree to appear at an Aryan Nations conference, as they just agreed to appear at Sharpton's National Action Network.

Other than that, there is no practical difference between Tom Metzger and Al Sharpton. Both have used racist and anti-Semitic slurs. Both have, at least indirectly, incited racist violence in which people have been killed. Al Sharpton is simply a darker version of Tom Metzger, and racism stinks in every color.

Democrats and Al Sharpton: "Racist hatemongers appeal to the absolute dregs of their respective societies"


Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Democrats Embrace Al Sharpton's Racist National Action Network

While it might be refreshing to pull the D lever after eight years of "Not Gore" and "Not Kerry," it is now totally impossible for us to do so. It is in fact triply impossible for a "white interloper " and "[Jewish] diamond merchant" (to use Al Sharpton's own terms for us) who lived in Wappingers Falls NY in 1988 to even bother looking at the platforms of anyone who appears in public with an infamous racist whose anti-Semitic hate speech helped incite two incidents of fatal violence.

While it is obvious that no "cracker" or "bloodsucking Jew" (terminology used by National Action Network people while they were killing a Jew in Crown Heights and burning down a Jewish-owned store in Harlem) who knows anything about Sharpton could possibly vote for anyone who consorts with him, neither can any self-respecting African-American. Racists and anti-Semites appeal universally to the absolute dregs of the societies for which they claim to speak. If former Ku Klux Klansman David Duke appeals to the lowest class of white person, the kind of Black whose vote Al Sharpton can actually deliver is self-evident. By acting as though Al Sharpton can "deliver the Black vote," Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Howard Dean, John Edwards, Bill Richardson, and Joe Biden (the one who effectively called Obama a credit to his race) have effectively equated all African-Americans to the class of white people who regard David Duke as a leader.


Democrats Scramble to Court Sharpton
Presidential Candidates Scramble to Pursue Black Voters in the 'Al Sharpton Primary'
NEW YORK Apr 18, 2007 (AP)— Democratic presidential contenders are scrambling for support in what's being dubbed the Al Sharpton primary. The civil rights leader livened up the 2004 Democratic primary with his pompadour hairdo and sharp, witty oratory. This election, the high-profile Sharpton, fresh from the fight over Don Imus' derogatory remarks, is attracting all the party's major candidates this week for his annual National Action Network convention.


There we have it: all six Democratic candidates have agreed to appear at, and thus give credibility to, the African-American equivalent of a Ku Klux Klan meeting. This should automatically disqualify all six of them from even being considered by any decent American. For those who do not remember exactly what Al Sharpton is and what he has done, Fred Siegel's outstanding Democrats Embrace 'Impresario of Hatred'


It would have taken no great effort for the reporters covering the Apollo debate to have walked across 125th Street from the theater to visit Freddy's Fashion Mart, where in 1995 eight people died in a murderous rampage inspired by Mr. Sharpton.

Mr. Sharpton is best-known for the Tawana Brawley hoax, in which he insisted that a 15-year-old black girl had been abducted and raped by a band of white men practicing Irish Republican Army rituals. In fact she had made up the story to protect herself from her violent stepfather.

But at Freddy's, Mr. Sharpton was even more malevolent. He turned a landlord-tenant dispute between the Jewish owner of Freddy's and a black subtenant into a theater of hatred. Picketers from Mr. Sharpton's National Action Network, sometimes joined by "the Rev." himself, marched daily outside the store, screaming about "bloodsucking Jews" and "Jew bastards" and threatening to burn the building down.

After weeks of increasingly violent rhetoric, one of the protesters, Roland Smith, took Mr. Sharpton's words about ousting the "white interloper" to heart. He ran into the store shouting, "It's on!" He shot and wounded three whites and a Pakistani, whom he apparently mistook for a Jew. Then he set the fire, which killed five Hispanics, one Guyanese and one African-American--a security guard whom protesters had taunted as a "cracker lover." Smith then fatally shot himself.



http://www.nationalreview.com/20Mar00/nordlinger032000.html adds,

There was more, of course-always more. In the spring of 1989, the Central Park “wilding” occurred. That was the monstrous rape and beating of a young white woman, known to most of the world as “the jogger.” The hatred heaped on her by Sharpton and his claque is almost impossible to fathom, and wrenching to review. ...Outside the courthouse, they [Sharpton and his entourage] chanted, “The boyfriend did it! The boyfriend did it!” They denounced the victim as “Whore!” They screamed her name, over and over (because most publications refused to print it, though several black-owned ones did). Sharpton brought Tawana Brawley to the trial one day, to show her, he said, the difference between white justice and black justice. He arranged for her to meet the jogger’s attackers, whom she greeted with comradely warmth. In another of his publicity stunts, he appealed for a psychiatrist to examine the victim. “It doesn’t even have to be a black psychiatrist,” he said, generously. He added: “We’re not endorsing the damage to the girl — if there was this damage.”

...But the torching, so to speak, continued. In 1995-four years into the putative New Sharpton-there was another, fatal case in which Sharpton had a guilty hand: Freddy’s Fashion Mart. In Harlem, a white store owner — no, worse: a Jewish one — was accused of driving a black store owner out of business. At one of the many rallies meant to scare the Jewish owner away [can anyone say, "burning crosses meant to scare the Negro owner away?"], Sharpton charged that “there is a systemic and methodical strategy to eliminate our people from doing business off 125th Street. I want to make it clear . . . that we will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business.” Sharpton’s colleague, Morris Powell, said of the Jewish owner — Sharpton’s “white interloper” — “We’re going to see that this cracker suffers. Reverend Sharpton is on it.”


This pretty much puts Al Sharpton in the same class of white supremacists who incite, at least indirectly, the actual lynching of African-Americans: in other words, the worst and most violent elements of the Ku Klux Klan and Tom Metzger's White Aryan Resistance (WAR).


he attracted nationwide publicity in 1990, when an Oregon jury rendered a $12.5 million judgment against him and his son, John, for inciting the murder of an Ethiopian immigrant by skinheads.


Compare this to what was said above:


After weeks of increasingly violent rhetoric, one of the protesters, Roland Smith, took Mr. Sharpton's words about ousting the "white interloper" to heart. He ran into the store shouting, "It's on!" He shot and wounded three whites and a Pakistani, whom he apparently mistook for a Jew. Then he set the fire, which killed five Hispanics, one Guyanese and one African-American--a security guard whom protesters had taunted as a "cracker lover." Smith then fatally shot himself.


Al Sharpton is therefore the African-American equivalent of Tom Metzger, and that is the kind of individual with whom the six Democratic candidates have chosen to appear. Note that the above excerpt shows that Sharpton himself, as opposed to a rogue follower, was responsible for the "white interloper" remark. He was essentially saying that a Caucasian did not belong in Harlem (and, by implication, should be driven out) just as white supremacists say, "We don't want any Negroes in our neighborhood." "Negroes" is, of course, not exactly the word they use. Sharpton was also personally responsible for statements about "[Jewish] diamond merchants," "Greek homos," and even "N***er," the latter being applied to a Black person he didn't like. http://www.nationalreview.com/20Mar00/nordlinger032000.html "Once he [Sharpton] had referred to [David] Dinkins as “that nigger whore turning tricks in City Hall.”



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Sharpton#Accusations_of_racism_and_homophobia
Sharpton was quoted as saying to an audience at Kean College in 1994 that, “White folks was in caves while we was building empires ... We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.” Sharpton defended his comments by noting that the term “homo” was not homophobic but added that he no longer uses the term.


As far as we know, "homo" is indeed a derogatory term for a gay person, just as "cracker" is a derogatory term for a Caucasian and "bloodsucking Jew" is a derogatory term for a Jew. Sharpton apparently thinks he is Humpty Dumpty, who proclaimed that, when he used a word, it meant exactly what he wanted it to mean: no more and no less.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Sharpton#Crown_Heights_Riot
A visiting rabbinical student from Australia by the name of Yankel Rosenbaum, 29, was killed during the rioting by a mob shouting "Kill the Jew." Sharpton has been seen by some commentators as inflaming tensions with remarks such as "If the Jews want to get it on, tell them to pin their yarmulkes back and come over to my house" and referring to Jews as "diamond merchants."


Sharpton (we will not address you as "Mister" or "Reverend" or with any other title of respect), we have wanted to get it on with you ever since you brought your lying face to Wappingers Falls in 1988. Now we are going to wrap you around the Democrats' necks like the stinking-to-high-heaven racist and anti-Semitic bigot you are, and it is going to cost them next year's election--unless the party finds someone else between now and then.


Response to Milwaukee Journal Sentinal on Tommy Thompson

To the Editor;I do not find Tommy Thompson's remarks statement that earning money is "sort of part of the Jewish tradition" any more offensive than I think most Protestants would find, "earning money is sort of part of the Protestant work ethic."

If, however, Thompson's statement is sufficiently ill-judged to call for his withdrawal, then every single Democratic candidate who just agreed to appear at Al Sharpton's National Action Network is even less qualified to be President. As a "white interloper" and "[Jewish] diamond merchant" (Sharpton's own terms for me; his entourage threw in "bloodsucking Jew" and "cracker" for good measure) and also a Wappingers Falls resident in 1988, I will be triply unable to even consider voting for Clinton, Obama, Richardson, Dean, or Edwards next November.

Furthermore, it is well known that racist demagogues appeal to the absolute dregs of the societies they claim to represent. If former Klansman David Duke appeals to what is commonly known as "white trash," the kind of Black voter whose vote Sharpton can actually deliver is self-evident. The fact that the above Democrats are willing to appear in public with the Black counterpart of David Duke shows their low, and quite possibly racist, expectations of African-Americans as a whole.

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Jon Corzine: reckless driving endangers others before causing high-speed crash

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18158503/

CAMDEN, N.J. - The SUV carrying Gov. Jon S. Corzine was traveling about 91 mph moments before it crashed, Superintendent of State Police Col. Rick Fuentes said Tuesday. The speed limit along that stretch of the parkway is 65 mph.
26 miles an hour over the limit is considered a misdemeanor (not a mere summary offense or infraction) in New York, although other states may have other laws. It's good for something like 5-6 points (12 = license suspension) in Pennsylvania.
The state trooper-driven sport utility vehicle was in the left lane with its emergency lights flashing when a pickup tried to get out of its way. Instead, it set off a chain reaction that resulted in the crash.

In other words, Corzine's driver (under Corzine's supervision) was abusing an emergency vehicle by using its flashing lights in a non-emergency situation while forcing a pickup truck to "get out of its way," thus putting that motorist's life at risk. Then the SUV crashed, with serious injuries to Corzine, who was not wearing his seat belt. It looks like Mother Nature (she can be one mean mother) did not accord him the special privileges he thought should accompany his position, because she put him in the hospital with serious injuries. Nonetheless, we wish him a speedy and full recovery.

UPDATE: NEW JERSEY LAW REGARDING USE OF EMERGENCY RIGHT OF WAY

9:4-91. a. The driver of a vehicle upon a highway shall yield the right of way to any authorized emergency vehicle when it is operated on official business, or in the exercise of the driver's profession or calling, in response to an emergency call or in the pursuit of an actual or suspected violator of the law and when an audible signal by bell, siren, exhaust whistle or other means is sounded from the authorized emergency vehicle...

We don't see "rushing Governor Corzine to a photo-op" in the above paragraph. It says "in response to an emergency call or in the pursuit of an actual or suspected violator of the law..."

b. This section shall not relieve the driver of any authorized emergency vehicle from the duty to drive with due regard for the safety of all persons, nor shall it protect the driver from the consequences of his reckless disregard for the safety of others. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit any immunity or defense otherwise provided by law.

More anti-Christian hate from the National Jewish Democratic Council

No surprise: the National "Jewish" "Democratic" Council also hates the wrong "kinds" of Jews (e.g. Republican ones) and even publishes anti-Semitic hate propaganda that originally came from genuine Nazis. (No Godwin's law, please; we really mean the goose-steppers with the swastikas.)





If someone put a Star of David on the flag below, people would consider this picture anti-Semitic. And they would be right. This is a hate cartoon directed at Christians.


Don't forget, the following candidates are all appearing at this anti-Christian hate organization's conference!

U.S. Senator Joseph Biden
U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton
U.S. Senator Chris Dodd
U.S. Senator John Edwards
U.S. Senator Barack Obama
Governor Bill Richardson

Monday, April 16, 2007

Democratic Candidates Embrace Anti-Semitic Hate Group

After the Nevada Democratic Party cancelled a Presidential debate on Fox News, the major Democratic candidates (Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards, Joseph Biden, Chris Dodd, Bill Richardson) have all agreed to speak at the conference of an anti-Christian and anti-Semitic hate organization: the National Jewish Democratic Council. We have previously shown that this is a double oxymoron, as there is nothing either Jewish or Democratic about this organization.

How could the National "Jewish" Democratic Council be anti-Semitic? It is anti-Semitic for exactly the same reason that Black rap artists who continuously describe Black men as "pimps" and Black women as "hos" are racists. When a purportedly Jewish organization spews anti-Semitic propaganda, it is far more destructive than it would be if it came from a white supremacist hate group. The white supremacists can point to NJDC and say, "Look, this is what those Jews say about themselves!" They can point to rap artists like Snoop Dogg and say, "Look, this is what those Blacks say about Black men and Black women," although "Blacks" is probably not the word the white supremacists use.

The National "Jewish" Democratic Council is Anti-Semitic
The Judenrats (Nazi-appointed Jewish governing councils) and kapos (Jewish concentration camp trustees) of the Second World War can, to some degree or other, offer the defense of duress for their collaboration with the Nazis. If they didn't cooperate, the Nazis would have simply killed them and found other Jews who would be more cooperative. One of the Judenrat's functions was to tell Jews that the cattle cars were going to take them to nice country retreats and relaxing work camps. In contrast to Jews who cooperated with Nazis because they had guns (often literally) to their heads, NJDC leader Ira Forman was under no duress whatsoever when he said the following:

Jewish voters should take comfort in knowing that MoveOn.org is not a haven for anti-Semitism and the organization will renounce and remove any postings of the sort. Leave it to Republicans to not allow the truth to get in the way of campaigning.

Sincerely,
Ira Forman
Executive Director
National Jewish Democratic Council


Right: MoveOn.org is not an anti-Semitic organization even though it knowingly and willfully welcomed the most vicious imaginable anti-Semitic hate speech, including an actual blood libel of Jews, at its moderated Action Forum. However, Tommy Thompson is anti-Semitic because he is a Republican said that making money "is part of the Jewish tradition." Thompson was referring to the Jewish culture of education and industry, which naturally tend to produce higher incomes. It is like promoting the stereotype that, at most American universities, "the Asian students are always in the library" (and therefore earning higher grades than the non-Asians who are out partying.) Thompson actually said,

I'm in the private sector and for the first time in my life I'm earning money. You know that's sort of part of the Jewish tradition and I do not find anything wrong with that.


What if he had said, "I'm in the private sector and for the first time in my life I'm earning money. You know that's consistent with the Protestant work ethic and I do not find anything wrong with that?" Would that be derogatory of Protestants? The problem is that the NJDC is so desperate to find things wrong with Republicans that it will call John McCain a racist for using the phrase "tar baby" (an inanimate object from a very entertaining story from Black folklore) while whitewashing MoveOn.org for promoting actual blood libels of Jews, 9/11 denial, and hate speech against Catholics, evangelical Christians, and even Black people.

We have seen so far that NJDC is anti-Semitic for lying to Jews about MoveOn.org's anti-Semitic hate activities. NJDC adds to this its own vicious anti-Semitic propaganda. From Republicans' Elephant in the Living Room comes this beauty:

As for the purportedly common ground between Jews and Christians on American domestic issues, it is narrow indeed. Research by a variety of scholars and pollsters - Ken Wald of the University of Florida, Eric Uslaner and Mark Lichbach of the University of Maryland, the survey released just last week … shows a chasm between American Jews and evangelical Christians on issues ranging from the Iraq war to legal abortion to gay rights.

More than identifying the schism on any specific topic, the research describes a visceral distrust, bordering on antipathy, for Evangelical Christians on the part of American Jews. For myself, I find this attitude to be exaggerated, or at least more suited to the past than the present, and yet it is an undeniable political reality. It is the kind of passionate reflex that a political consultant of my acquaintance, who happens to be a Republican, refers to as an “emotional trigger.” And in any campaign, he says, you need to find your side’s emotional trigger to get people out the door to vote.


This statement is clearly designed to damage relations between Jews and evangelical Christians, and it is therefore anti-Semitic. It is, in fact, similar to "Jew as Christian-hater" propaganda that anti-Semites have spewed for centuries to incite pogroms and, most recently, the Holocaust. From “Propaganda and Children during the Hitler Years” by Mary Mills at Nizkor’s Web site,

Drawing on several centuries of anti-semitism, Bauer intensifies her anti-semitic assault by making the virtuous German the object of the Jewish hate. …An example of this concept of the Jew as a Christian-hater occurs in Uncovered Jewry, Or A Thorough And Truthful Report About The Horrible Ways The Hidden Jews Desecrate The Holy Trinity.


It would be one matter if a statement like "a visceral distrust, bordering on antipathy, for Evangelical Christians on the part of American Jews" had come from the Ku Klux Klan or some other white supremacist group, because it could then be written off as white supremacist hate speech. When it comes from a purportedly Jewish organization, however, it becomes believable--just as depictions of Black men as pimps and Black women as "hos" becomes semi-credible when it comes from a Black rapper like Snoop Dogg. The proper response, of course, is to write off Snoop Dogg as a low-class entertainer who is no more representative of Black people than NJDC is representative of Jews.

Having accused Jews of "distrusting" Christians, NJDC does its best to intensify this distrust with anti-Christian hate cartoons. The following clips are from its "Bubbie" video series, which it posted during the 2004 elections. This frame has a Christian minister proclaiming, "A vote for Bush is a vote for God." We can imagine how Christians might be outraged by this picture, and we must denounce and repudiate its connections with anyone or anything we are prepared to recognize as "Jewish."


http://www.stentorian.com/MoveOn/njdc_minister.jpg

Then NJDC uses the issue of evangelism to damage Jewish-Christian relations, as shown by the following.

http://www.stentorian.com/MoveOn/njdc_jesus.jpg

The implication is obvious; the evangelists, or "Jews for Jesus," are trying to convert Jews while proclaiming that a vote for Bush is a vote for God. We are not personally receptive to the J for J's position that Jesus was the son of God and that we should worship him. On the other hand, we could easily describe ourselves as "Jews for Jesus' teachings," noting that there is no appreciable difference between what Jesus would do and what Rabbi Hillel would do. Instead of looking for common ground on which we can meet and welcome our Christian friends, e.g. the fact that "what would Jesus do?" is probably 99 times out of 100 what Rabbi Hillel would do, NJDC is doing its best to alienate Christians. NJDC can therefore be regarded as a divisive hate organization that has no place in civilized and rational political discourse.

Having directed hatred and contempt at Christians, NJDC goes on to mock Jewish members of George Bush's cabinet by having them dance the hora for Bubbie, the stereotyped Jewish grandmother:


http://www.stentorian.com/MoveOn/njdc_cabinet.jpg


In other words, NJDC is even willing to use Jewish ethnic stereotypes against Jews it happens to dislike. NJDC is worse than an ordinary hate organization, which directs hate speech and pictures only against outsiders; it even directs ridicule and contempt at the very ethnic or religious group it claims to represent.

It is a well known fact that racist demagogues and hate organizations appeal almost universally to the lowest classes of the societies they claim to represent. White supremacist David Duke appeals to the lowest class of Caucasian, while Al Sharpton appeals to the lowest kind of African-American. The fact that both John Kerry and Ned Lamont welcomed this racist and anti-Semite's support shows that they do not think very highly of Black people. Most Caucasians would be outraged by the implication that the likes of David Duke could deliver their vote to a candidate, and Kerry's and Lamont's position that Sharpton can "deliver the Black vote" is repugnant and insulting to every decent African-American in the country.

As far as we are concerned, the following individuals have just told us that they think we are the kind of Jew whose vote can be delivered by the hate-mongers of the National "Jewish" "Democratic" Council. They have effectively told us that we are the Jewish counterpart of the kind of white person to whom David Duke might appeal, or the class of Black person whose vote Al Sharpton can deliver.

U.S. Senator Joseph Biden
U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton
U.S. Senator Chris Dodd
U.S. Senator John Edwards
U.S. Senator Barack Obama
Governor Bill Richardson


The above individuals have automatically disqualified themselves from any consideration for our vote next year, and the Democratic Party would be well advised to look into someone like Joe Lieberman ("Jew Lieberman" as MoveOn.org's people call him), Pennsylvania's Ed Rendell, Paul Kanjorski, or some other genuine DEMOCRAT who has not soiled his or her hands through contact with MoveOn.org, NJDC, or Al Sharpton.