MoveOn.org, Please Move On!

Not Just ACORN: Obama's Own Campaign Accused of Election Fraud

2008-10-19T14:09:00.000-04:00

Like a common thief who, when caught red-handed with his hand in the till, calls the cop who caught him a crook, Barack Obama's campaign has asked the Department of Justice to "look into whether any administration officials have worked in a joint effort with the McCain campaign and the RNC in legitimizing the allegations of vote fraud." We are somehow reminded of Boss Tweed's bullyboys and private police force roughing up any New Yorker who dared to point out that he had seen Tweed's partisans vote twice.

Below is an optical character recognition scan of the relevant portion of Obama campaign counsel Bob Bauer's letter to the Department of Justice. Not only is Bauer sufficiently audacious to assert, "These [vote fraud] allegations do not mean illegal voting. Nobody really expects thousands of Mickey Mouses or Tony Romos to show up at the poll to vote this fall." Sure, Bobby, and that guy who is concealing merchandise in his coat doesn't really intend to carry it out of the store without paying. Why register nonexistent people, dead people, and children to vote unless you plan to have them vote? What stops an ACORN worker from going to multiple polling places to vote under multiple ACORN-fabricated identities? Mickey Mouse might not get past the door, but that seven year-old girl whom ACORN registered as an adult just might.

Furthermore, Bobby, you should remember the old adage about coming into court with clean hands, and you sure don't want a court (or the Department of Justice) to take official notice of the highly credible allegations against Barack Obama's own campaign of outright election fraud.

II. Current Bogus Claims of Vote Fraud and the McCain-Palin Campaign’s Attempts to Involve U.S. Attorneys and the Department of Justice.

History is repeating itself. As Election Day approaches – just as in 2004 and 2006 – Republican Party officials and operatives nationwide, including the candidates themselves, are fomenting specious vote fraud allegations, and there are disturbing indications of official involvement or collusion. What we have seen, each step connecting to and reinforcing the other, are:

A, High level party claims of ”fraud,” including those made by the Republican Presidential and Vice Presidential nominees – including the entirely unsupported assertion by John McCain to a national television audience that vote fraud threatened to tear at the very ”fabric of democracy;”’

B. Republican party officials reinforcing and sensationalizing this message by repeating it at the state and local level and initiating actions in violation of the law to harass voters and impede their exercise of their rights;

C. Republican officeholders calling on the Department of Justice to initiate investigations of these manufactured allegations of ”fraud” – including, remarkably, direct appeals to US Attorneys; and

D. Emerging indications of official Departmental involvement or collusion, as leaks of an investigation have now begun in violation of Departmental policy,

Of course, the timing of the opening of this investigation and leaking of this information is damning, 19 days before the general election – and less than 24 hours after the Republican Presidential nominee announced the advent of fraud so pervasive that it threatened the very ”fabric of democracy”...

’ Voter registration impropriety does not constitute actual vote fraud. Indeed, despite strenuous effort there is not documented evidence of anything but isolated and sporadic instances of voter fraud. See Lipton, In 5-year Egort, Scant Evidence of Voter Fraud, New York Times, April 12, 2007.

’ Senator McCain’s running mate, Governor Sarah Palin, has taken up the claims in similarly hyperbolic and unsupportable forms: ”’In this election, it’s a choice between a candidate who won’t disavow a group committing voter fraud, and a leader who won’t tolerate voter fraud,’ Palin said.” Associated Press, October 16, 2008, available at http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqMSjQBGxUYE4A W6bbOHSUgHkKvipTJwD93RPSOGO.

Right, Bobby, "Voter registration impropriety does not constitute actual vote fraud," provided that Mickey Mouse, Dick Tracy, Mary Poppins, Jive Turkey, and perhaps a million more registrants with less prominent names are purged from the rolls before Election Day. As long as Obama wants to involve the Department of Justice in accusations that the Republicans are falsely accusing his campaign of election fraud, let's add some Democrats--Hillary Clinton to be precise.

January 23, 2008
Jill Derby, Chair Nevada State Democratic Party 1210 South Valley View Road Suite 114 Las Vegas, NV 89102

Dear Chair Derby:
I write on behalf of Hillary Clinton for President (”the Committee”) in regard to the January 19, 2008 Nevada Democ-ratic Caucus. The Committee is aware of a letter addressed to you today from the Obama for America campaign requesting an inquiry into the conduct of the caucuses. The Committee shares the Obama campaign’s concern that full participation in the democratic process may have been compromised by the substantial number of irregularities occurring at the caucuses, and we fully support a complete inquiry by the Nevada State Democratic Party (the ”Party”) into all caucus improprieties.

This letter is not intended as a response to the Obama campaign’s letter. However, in the interest of a complete record, and in contrast to the alleged minor procedural problems noted by the Obama campaign, the Committee wishes to bring to your attention information we have received evidencing a premeditated and predesigned plan by the Obama campaign to engage in systematic corruption of the Party’s caucus procedures. Compounding this blatant distortion of the caucus rules was an egregious effort by the Obama campaign to manipulate the voter registration process in its own favor, thereby disenfranchising countless voters. Finally, the Committee has received a vast number of reliable reports of voter suppression and intimidation by the Obama campaign or its allies.

The Committee had 30 phone lines on Saturday to receive calls in its Las Vegas offices. These lines rang continuously from early morning until well after the caucuses concluded with reports from people who were victimized and who observed irregularities. The phone lines were so over-whelmed that many callers resorted to calling individual Committee staff cell phones to report that they could not get through. The Committee also received many similar calls at its national headquarters.

The Committee is confident that any investigation into the conduct of the caucuses will be thorough, fair and in the interest of insuring that future Party caucuses will be as open and democratic as possible.

Systematic Corruption of the Party’s Caucus Procedures
The Committee received substantially similar reports of improprieties of such a number as to leave no conclusion but that the Obama campaign and its allies and supporters engaged in a planned effort to subvert the Party’s caucus procedures to its advantage. For example:

þ Preference cards were premarked for Obama.

þ Clinton supporters were denied preference cards on the basis that none were left, while Obama supporters at the same caucus sites were given preference cards.

þ Caucus chairs obviously supporting Obama:
o Deliberately miscounted votes to favor Senator Obama.
o Deliberately counted unregistered persons as Obama votes.
o Deliberately counted young children as Obama votes.
o Refused to accept preference cards from Clinton supporters who were at the caucus site by noon on the ground that the cards were not filled out fast enough.
o Told Clinton supporters to leave prior to electing delegates.

þ Clinton supporters who arrived late were turned away from the caucus, while late Obama supporters were admitted to the caucus.

Manipulation of the Voter Registration Process
Numerous reports received by the Committee demonstrate a concerted effort on the part of the Obama campaign and its supporters to prevent eligible voters supporting a candidate other than Senator Obama from caucusing. The Obama supporters complained of were acting in positions of authority at the caucus sites. Some of these reports are as follows:

þ Obama supporters wrongly informed Clinton supporters that they were not allowed to participate in the caucus if their names were not on the voter rolls. However, Obama supporters whose names did not appear on the voter rolls were permitted to register at the caucus site.

þ Obama supporters falsely informed Clinton supporters that no registration forms were available for them to register to vote at the caucus site.

þ Obama supporters wrongly told Clinton supporters who were attempting to caucus at the wrong precinct that they could not caucus at that site, while simultaneously permitting Obama supporters at the wrong precinct to participate.

þ Obama supporters were allowed to move to the front of the registration and sign-in line.

Voter Suppression and Intimidation
The Committee received a substantial number of disturbing reports from voters that they had been subject to harassment, intimidation or efforts to prevent them from voting. Some of the most egregious of these complaints are described below:

þ Voters at at-large caucus sites were informed that those sites were for Obama supporters only.

þ Clinton supporters at at-large caucus sites were told that their managers would be watching them while they caucused.

þ Workers were informed that their supervisors kept lists of Clinton and Obama supporters, and were told that they could not caucus unless their name was on the list of Obama supporters.

þ Many Clinton supporters were threatened with employment termination or other discipline if they caucused for Senator Clinton.

þ Workers were required to sign a pledge card to support Obama if they wanted time off to participate in the caucus.
þ Workers at one casino were offered a lavish lunch and permitted to attend and register to vote only if they agree to support Obama.

The complaints summarized above represent only a small sample of the complaints received by the Committee. With respect to each of these complaints and many more, the Committee has the names and phone numbers of those reporting these incidents and the specific precinct numbers where the incidents occurred. Upon request the Committee will share these with the Party with appropriate safeguards to protect these individuals from reprisal. On the whole, these reports show a troubling effort by the Obama campaign and its allies and supporters to advance their own campaign at the expense of the right of all Nevada Democrats to participate in the democratic process in a free, fair and open manner.

Senator Clinton and the Committee are wholly committed to ensuring that every eligible voter has his or her vote cast and counted. There is no place in the American electoral process for the types of voter suppression, intimidation and harassment systematically engaged in by the Obama campaign, its allies and supporters.
Sincerely,
/v
Lyn Utrecht Counsel Hillary Clinton for President

We think this letter should join Mr. Baeur's letter at the Department of Justice just to make sure all the cards are on the table, and that the air is cleared thoroughly before November 4.

Obama Supporters Deserting over ACORN scandal: "Say it Ain't So, Barry."

2008-10-11T03:31:00.000-04:00

Obama's FORMER supporters at My.BarackObama.com say "Obama let us down"

We have little doubt that the people who posted these entries will soon have their My.BarackObama.com accounts disabled by Obama's moderators (and at least one did), in which case we are delighted to welcome them to PUMA or the GOP, whichever they prefer. Since their pages will doubtlessly be taken down as well, we will include the Google caches for reference. What we are looking at is what organizational science calls "loss of commitment," and its result is total organizational disaster. The original "Say it ain't so" is, incidentally, from the 1919 Chicago "Black Sox" scandal.

http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/lindsaycalhoun/gGgKhK/commentary

ACORN
By Lindsay - Oct 9th, 2008 at 7:37 pm EDT

This ACORN stuff is really really bad. As a voter, I really need to know that Obama wasn't funding an organization that willingly engaged in voter fraud.

This could be a game changer for me.

Obama Lies About Acorn (cache)

OBAMA LIES ABOUT ACORN
By MYOHIO - Oct 9th, 2008 at 1:12 pm EDT
Comments | Mail to a Friend | Report Objectionable Content

This is what Obama said to ACORN, at a November, 2007 speech, according to Newsmax:

“I’ve been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career. Even before I was an elected official, when I ran Project Vote voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it, and we appreciate your work.”

By Mark from Pittsburg, KS Yesterday at 1:44 am EDT (Updated Yesterday at 1:44 am EDT)
I have been a devoted supporter of Barack Obama since I saw him speak at the 2004 Democratic Convention, for which I was a delegate, but I am very disappointed by the campaign's response thus far. If Barack does not strongly denounce some of the tactics of ACORN, and call for an IMMEDIATE investigation, I fear that voters (many of whom are already angry at all politicians) will lose faith in Barack. Given that such faith in Senator Obama is crucial to his "brand," this could represent a serious threat to our campaign. I must confess that this episode represents the first time my faith in Barack has been tested. Such faith of Americans in Barack is not only crucial to the campaign, but also in any hopes we have for his successful presidency.

Sincerely,
Mark Peterson

By First Name from Avondale, AZ Yesterday at 9:53 pm EDT (Updated Yesterday at 9:53 pm EDT)
His ties to the pastor who said those awful things about America, his connection to a terrorist who bombed the Pentagon, now Acorn is registering people to vote who don't exist. Does this sound like a president to you? I'm really worried about America's future.

Acorn and Voter Fraud (cache)

ACORN and Voter Fraud
By Robert from Mableton, GA - Oct 9th, 2008 at 8:42 pm EDT
Comments | Mail to a Friend | Report Objectionable Content

I think it is very important for Barack Obama to address this issue before it gets out-of-control. If Obama has paid them to register voters and if ACORN has been shown to do illegal things this could blow up in the campaigns face. I would strongly suggest that the campaign does not dodge this issue. If ACORN is doing illegal things, Obama should get out from underneath it.

Bob from Atlanta

This one was deleted by Obama's moderators, but not before Google cached it. The user's account was disabled as well

CURIOUS
By K from Portland, OR - Oct 9th, 2008 at 3:11 am EDT
Comments | Mail to a Friend | Report Objectionable Content Tags: disappointment

There is so much talk within this campaign, by Biden, Obama and supporters, about the lies and comments coming from the McCain campaign regarding Ayres and Acorn. I have investigated both topics, and at this point have been unable to identify any lies out of the McCain camp. Indeed, there is a great deal of information tying Obama to Ayres, and to the corrupt company Acorn. Today the FBI announced raids on many Acorn offices - within Obama's target states. Since Obama has paid that company $800,000 to hire Acorn to register people in these same states, what are we to think about the connection between Obama and Acorn? What are we to think about the 'increases' in registration, when Directors of Elections in various states, and the FBI report hundreds of thousands false forms having been filed by Acorn (and they have been shown on the news).

We now have the problem of questioning 1) voter registration and actual voting in these states; 2) Obama's responses to criticism. And if we have to question all of that, then how can we take at face value anything this ticket says?

For my part, I feel very let down. I feel a total lack of trust in this team, and in what has been voiced in the various sound bites and rhetoric. Let's face it - it looks BAD that the company this campaign hired at a large sum of money (the same company Obama worked for over years, including doing their training), the same company that has been under investigation and lawsuits for over 10 years, is now under seige of the FBI for fraud. This looks bad, and frankly it smacks of desperation and a determination to do anything, no matter the cost, to get elected.

This is a campaign of change? From what? to What? This sounds like Chicago politics as usual.

ACORN MAJOR PROBLEM - URGENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By Jennifer from Chicago, IL - Oct 10th, 2008 at 2:50 pm EDT
Comments | Mail to a Friend | Report Objectionable Content

Obama campaign - you have a real situation on your hands w/ this Acorn dilema. Who cares about Wright and Ayers, but FRAUD, this is huge. Your entire campaign has centered around trust and change and this could completely tarnish your reputation. You, Obama, need to get on TV RIGHT NOW and explain the situation. This cannot linger in hopes of it dying down and it needs to be addressed before the McCain camp attacks. I would suggest you telling the American people, that you are appalled and don't condone this activity and that you will put up you own money (personal or campaign) to ensure that no this situation is fixed. You must explain what is going on and separate yourself from this activity......NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jennifer, let us introduce you to the underside of Obama's bus, where your MyBO account will soon go--but don't worry, you will find plenty of good company

I'm still undecided. I am very concerned about all the news about Ayers, Wright, Farakan, Rezko, ACORN, etc. Please convince me i have nothing to worry about.

In other words, "Say it ain't so, Barry."

BREAKING SCANDAL: Missouri Governor Accuses Obama of Conspiring to Violate Civil Rights

2008-09-27T19:49:00.000-04:00

Please copy, paste, and circulate this press release from the Governor of Missouri.

Note the Web domain of the press release, governor.mo.gov. This is not "someone's blog," a "rumor," or a "smear." It is the official Web site of Missouri's state government. The Governor of Missouri says openly that Barack Obama conspired to misuse his state's law enforcement resources to "threaten and intimidate his critics."

We cannot overemphasize the gravity of Governor Blunt's accusation. While we are not attorneys and cannot give legal advice, "Conspiracy against rights" is a felony under the U.S. Code, Title 18 (Crimes). At present, Governor Blunt's allegation is exactly that, and Barack Obama, like everybody else, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. On the other hand, the court of public opinion is entitled to render a verdict before Election Day, and the following accusation needs to be either disproven or confirmed to the public's satisfaction. We therefore encourage our readers to circulate Governor Blunt's press release, which appears below, as widely as possible.

Please copy, paste, and circulate the following press release from the Governor of Missouri.

Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement

Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement

JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his critics.

“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.

“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.

“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.

“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.”

If this allegation is true, Barack Obama needs to do more than grow up. Governor Blunt said explicitly that "I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights." The U.S. Code (Title 18, Crimes) has a specific name for this.

§ 241. Conspiracy against rights

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

The "going in disguise on the highway" part probably refers to two or more night riders in sheets and hoods threatening Black people--the same constituency whom the Anointed One claims to represent--with repercussions for voting, exercising their right to free speech, and so on. In fact, a related section of the U.S. Code is known as the Ku Klux Klan Act for this exact reason.

In addition,

§ 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights

If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; or if two or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.

Governor Blunt's press release uses the specific words "using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights," "intimidation," and "silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment." We would like any attorneys who read this to weigh in on whether, assuming that Governor Blunt's allegations are proven, this constitutes a violation of the U.S. Code as shown above.

Meanwhile, if these allegations are indeed true, then Barack Obama can be compared legitimately to Adolf Hitler. Godwin's Law applies only when a comparison of a political opponent to Hitler or Nazis is a gross exaggeration, and "using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights" is exactly what Hitler and real Nazis once did to Germans.

Joe Biden: Barack Obama Lacks Judgment and Maturity

2008-09-25T12:42:00.000-04:00

Barack Obama's own running mate, the one whose 25-plus years of legislative experience are supposed to offset the wetness behind Obama's ears, said in effect that Obama lacks the judgment and maturity necessary to make executive decisions. "I'm Joe Biden, and I Didn't Approve This Ad" reports,

CBS' Katie Couric: "Are you disappointed with the tone of the campaign -- the lipstick on the pig stuff and some of the ads? And you guys haven't been completely guilt-free, making fun of John McCain's inability to use a computer?"

Biden: "I thought that was terrible, by the way."

Couric: "Why'd you do it then?"

Biden: "I didn't know we did it, and if I'd had anything to do with it, we would have never done it

Senator Biden is stating openly that his own running mate approved this campaign ad without consulting him and that, furthermore, the ad was terrible and that he would not have approved it. In other words, per Senator Biden, his own teammate blindsided and embarrassed him with an act of poor judgment. If Barack Obama lacks the judgment necessary to run a political campaign, how can he have the kind of judgment and maturity necessary to run a country?

Biden apparently realized that he said exactly that, because he then tries to excuse his running mate's actions.

Couric: "Did Barack Obama approve that ad? He said he did, right?"

Biden: "I don't think anything was intentional about that. They were trying to make another point."

Right: Barack Obama approved the ad, but it wasn't intentional. He wasn't responsible, it was above his pay grade, he voted "present," he was absent for the vote, he had no controlling authority, and the buck stops everywhere but his own desk. In contrast, every Naval officer knows he is responsible for EVERYTHING that happens on his watch. Therefore:

God ~~damn~~ BLESS American, McCain (Captain, USN, retired), 2008

"Churchgate:" Obama Misused Tax Exempt Church Resources for his Campaign

2008-09-10T15:05:00.000-04:00

Barack Obama's campaign has made a point about not taking money from big donors, even though it has received six figure bundled contributions from "little, ordinary people" like Goldman Sachs, Lehman Broters, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Execlon, and Microsoft,* and even though Obama broke his pledge to accept Federal campaign financing and the accompanying spending limits. The Obama campaign's fundraising ethics also include illegal and possibly rigged lotteries like "Dinner with Barack;" the "Backstage with Barack" lottery was modified to allow entry without a donation under pressure from Minnesota and possibly other law enforcement agencies.

While Barack Obama is at least morally responsible for the behavior of his campaign staff--and he signed his name to at least one of the lottery solicitations even though, as an attorney, he ought to know at least something about lottery laws--he is directly and personally responsible for his deliberate, premeditated, and willful misuse of the United Church of Christ's tax exempt resources to support his campaign.

* The corporations do not donate the money themselves, they bundle donations from employees and others. This is legal.

The story begins in 2007, when the United Church of Christ (UCC) invited Barack Obama to its annual Synod in Hartford Connecticut. The church wanted Obama to talk about the role of religious faith in his career. As a tax exempt institution, the church made it explicitly clear to Obama and his staff that no election-related activity could take place at the event. Obama and his staff understood and agreed to this. As stated by ”IRS Investigation: A Test Of Church’s Faith?” by UCC minister Davida Foy Crabtree in the Hartford Courant

Our purpose in inviting Sen. Obama in the spring of 2006 — long before he was a candidate for the presidency — was to ask him to address the connection between his Christian faith and his public service, to speak to us of the challenges for people of faith in the public square today. And he did so with eloquence. As a prominent member of our church, his was a natural invitation, just as the others were. To avoid any hint of endorsement or promotion, our national officers and our denominational attorney established clear understandings with Sen. Obama’s office in Washington. He readily agreed to all of them. We made it clear not only to his campaign staff but also to our own synod delegates and visitors that no advocacy or promotion of his candidacy would be permitted.

So far, so good; the United Church of Christ did everything it should have done to comply with the conditions of its tax exemption. After he said he understood and agreed that no campaign-related activity could take place at the Synod, Barack Obama wrote (thus showing premeditation and malice aforethought, as opposed to blurting out campaign promises in the heat of the moment) "A Politics of Conscience."

…It’s been several months now since I announced I was running for president. In that time, I’ve had the chance to talk with Americans all across this country. And I’ve found that no matter where I am, or who I’m talking to, there’s a common theme that emerges. It’s that folks are hungry for change – they’re hungry for something new. They’re ready to turn the page on the old politics and the old policies – whether it’s the war in Iraq or the health care crisis we’re in, or a school system that’s leaving too many kids behind despite the slogans.…

Our conscience can’t rest so long as 37 million Americans are poor and forgotten by their leaders in Washington and by the media elites. We need to heed the biblical call to care for “the least of these” and lift the poor out of despair. That’s why I’ve been fighting to expand the Earned Income Tax Credit and the minimum wage. If you’re working forty hours a week, you shouldn’t be living in poverty. But we also know that government initiatives are not enough. Each of us in our own lives needs to do what we can to help the poor. And until we do, our conscience cannot rest.Our conscience cannot rest so long as nearly 45 million Americans don’t have health insurance and the millions more who do are going bankrupt trying to pay for it. I have made a solemn pledge that I will sign a universal health care bill into law by the end of my first term as president that will cover every American and cut the cost of a typical family’s premiums by up to $2500 a year. That’s not simply a matter of policy or ideology – it’s a moral commitment.

he fact that Obama said this after promising explicitly that no campaign-related activity would take place during his appearance at the United Church of Christ shows that he doesn’t have much of a conscience at all. His conduct reminds us of a caller to a talk radio show who, after indicating his understanding of Federal Communication Commission rules that ban profanity, spews a long series of F-bombs once he is on the air. There are enough callers whose lack of maturity makes this a real possibility that there is a delay of several seconds between the time a person speaks and when the words are broadcast, and this allows the radio station to cut the sound if the F word or similar profanity is present. The United Church of Christ obviously felt that similar conduct from a United States Senator would be so inconcievable that there were no provisions for cutting Obama’s microphone, and the UCC was wrong. Obama effectively F-bombed his own church, thus causing its officers considerable stress and worry about what the IRS would do as a result. The IRS apparently reached the same conclusion:

Senator Obama was invited to speak at the 2007 General Synod, in a non-candidate capacity, on how his personal faith intersected with his public life. You further established that the United Church of Christ had verbally communicated to those in attendance that Senator Obama was there as a member of the church and not as a candidate for office, that the audience should not attempt to engage in any political activities and that the church’s legal counsel had advised Senator Obama’s campaign of the ground rules for his speech.

Also in response to the inquiry, you indicated that the United Church of Christ did not authorize or have any power to authorize campaign volunteers for Senator Obama to set up tables near the entrances of the Hartford Civic Center on Saturday, June 23, 2007, and that the activity was conducted on public property outside the control of the synod and therefore was not attributable to the church.

You further advised that the United Church of Christ’s website provides a link to the IRS fact sheet on ”Election Year Activities and the Prohibition on Political Campaign Intervention for Section 501(c)(3) Organizations,” and that your Nationwide Special Counsel has advised leaders of the United Church of Christ of the publication of Revenue Ruling 2007-41, in June 2007.(OCR transcription of part of the IRS letter to the United Church of Christ, http://www.ucc.org/news/pdf/irsletter.pdf)

Barack Obama promises change, including change in the way he is going to fund his political campaign, but his acceptance of six figure bundled contributions and his broken promise to accept Federal campaign financing and matching limits is just more of the same old stuff. On the other hand, Obama has certainly delivered change in the use of innovative campaign financing methods such as illegal and possibly rigged lotteries, and the diversion of tax exempt church resources for self-serving purposes. We encourage our readers to circulate this "Churchgate" story as widely as possible so the starry-eyed idealists who still idolize this fraud, phony, and empty suit will realize that they are worshiping an individual with few ethics, few principles, and no character.Technorati Tags: obama, united church of christ, ucc, synod, hartford, irs, a politics of conscience, tax exempt, lotteries, illegal lotteries, dinner with barack, bundled contributions, churchgate, internal revenue service, politics, of conscience

MoveOn.org: Jews Control "Racist" Fox News

2008-07-27T14:41:00.001-04:00

The following was posted to MoveOn.org's now disgraced Action Forum, with the sanction of the moderators who exercised editorial control over the site. Perhaps this, and not MoveOn.org's false accusation of racism, is the organization's real problem with Fox News. (This is not the only posting to MoveOn.org's Action Forum that talked about Jewish control of the media.)

But I can see why you might think you OWN! the media,or are entitled to: 8 JEWS RUN U.S. MEDIA Today, eight Jewish Americans run the vast majority of US television networks, the printed press, the Hollywood movie industry, the book publishing industry, and the recording industry.

Most of these industries are bundled into huge media conglomerates run by the following eight individuals:
Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner
Michael Eisner, Chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company
Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd
Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios
Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc
Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric
Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited
Fox News, which is of course owned by Rupert Murdock - also a jew.

Also from MoveOn.org's Action Forum, over which MoveOn.org exercised editorial control. This one garnered unanimous approval from the MoveOn community.

Another neo-con appeared today on C-Span to defend Bush and his spying program! I am Jewish and proud of it (despite everything) but I am sick of seeing those neo-cons posing as average joes on national television to defend Bush and his lies. Since they don't have the decency or honesty to identify themselves by saying: "But you know, I am a Zionist and may be biased" and since most Americans can't tell the difference and don't have the courage to ask, maybe they should be forced to wear an Israeli flag on the lapel of their jackets. Isn't it time to tell the American people the truth, i.e. that Jews control all the media.

8 of 8 MoveOn.org Action Forum participants AGREE that the Jews control all the media

Technorati Tags: moveon.org, fox news, rupert murdoch, antisemitism, racism

Anti-Catholic Hate Group Accuses Fox News of Racism

2008-07-26T12:58:00.001-04:00

MoveOn.org, whose endorsement Barack Obama solicited and accepted, recently posted a petition with the following content.

"FOX must stop injecting racism, prejudice, and fear into our political dialogue. We intend to hold FOX, its advertisers, and its personalities accountable for FOX's attempts to smear the Obamas."

This is quite an audacious and hypocritical statement from an anti-Catholic (and anti-Semitic) hate group whose now-disgraced Action Forum welcomed statements like "Catholic Pedophiles of America" and "The Catholics are raping your children" while publishing an official anti-Catholic hate cartoon that could have come directly from the pen of 19th century cartoonist Thomas Nast.

The following material appeared at MoveOn.org's now disgraced Action Forum, a discussion site over which MoveOn.org exercised editorial control. "Exercise of editorial control" makes MoveOn.org responsible, at least morally, for the content. The site allowed MoveOn's people to vote agreement or disagreement with the statements in question. Just as Barack Obama's church cheered Michael Pfleger's "There were a whole lot of white people crying," thus showing that Barack and Michelle Obama belong to a racist church, MoveOn's people gave overwhelming support to the anti-Catholic hate speech.

=====================

Nothing is being said about the five Catholic justices,three of whom would rewrite the constitution to destroy Church/State separation. They believe that God, the bible and faith supercede our Constitution, and that our leaders are acting with divine sanction. I know that Article VI states that religion shall not be a test for public office. It does not say, however, that the Senate can not question someone who hold beliefs that are in oppostion to the constitution, which all office holders must swear to uphold. The idea of a "Unitary Executive" has been praised by Alito. He clearly believes in a hierarchial concept of government, rather than one which comes from the governed. Why was this not highlighted by the Senate and the press?

29 out of 30 MoveOn.org Action Forum participants voted to AGREE with this

By continuing the attack on the GOP's culture of corruption with a call to arrest the Catholic pedophiles of America, we have the ability to break up the perverts and criminals running the country today. WE know there are hundreds of thousands of pedophiles created by the Catholic church's shuffling them around since 1950. WE know most of these people went on to higher education. By pushing for a complete outing of the 12,000 pedophiles they've admitted to so far we can put incredible pressure on any politicians who might be part of the cult. How many DeLay types want their constituents to find out that they've taken advantage of the teenage sex trade of the Marianas islands? How many victims of these pedophiles are now working in our schools, boy scout camps, governments and police forces? How would this impact the secret societies like the Skull and Boners if half their membership were convicted for sex crimes involving their highest ranking members? There is a reason why our Government refused to prosecute these citizens for covering-up this scandal for over 50 years. .... Priests abuse citizens and don't get arrested. The citizens they molested go on to create more pedophiles, but they ain't priests, so they go to prison. As they should. But until the priests are hounded down and arrested like the baby rapers they are, the neverending cycle will continue. You want to throw a monkey wrench in both political parties? Call for the arrest and immediate incarceration of the Catholic Pedophiles of America. Then we can do a little research. These priests were teachers. Find out who their students were and do a cross reference to see how many elected leaders were "educated" by them. Records of arrests for pedophilia have been kept for years. Are the hotspots of pedophilia in areas where the priests were relocated to? Until our elected leaders pursue this matter we won't know if the people we entrust our children to are people we can trust, or people trying to lower the age of consent to birth.

8 out of 9 voted to AGREE with this

...It never ends with the victim class because they only have to change the criteria to create another group to be persecuted. The vicitm class will expand until you too can be jailed for ridiculously minor offenses while the Catholics are raping your children.

94% voted to AGREE that the Catholics are raping your children.

Moveon.org won't start an impeachment petition, nor a drive for fair accurate voting. We will not have a fair vote count, and the Government Accounting Office says we didn't have one in 2004, 2000, 2002. And the Supreme Court is packed with Opus Dei Catholics who support a monarchy, placed in the White House their own man they put there by stopping authentic vote count or having a open hearing about vote fraud.

13 out of 14 voted to AGREE with this

If the Catholics and Southern Baptists can gang up on the rest of America to further their plans for world domination. Then a group of highly trained espionage experts shouldn't have a problem organising the attacks of 9/11. The red flag that keeps bothering me is the fact that not one of the sycophants that stopped the information flow has been publicly fired or chastised. Their identities have been kept absolutely secret. Every investigation has come to the conclusion that certain individuals stopped the information flow. Arrest those individuals for incompetence that led to the deaths of 5000 Americans. It's either incompetance or collusion. By protecting the identities of these individuals BushCo will forever carry the blame for 9/11. When listening to Republicans always remember that their primary objective is to protect their upline. George liked the 2800 number when it came time to pay. But 5000 sounds a lot better when you are trying to justify torture.

19 out of 21 voted to AGREE with this

This is the organization from which Barack Obama solicited and accepted an endorsement, and this is the organization that is now trying to smear Fox News as racist.

Anti-Semitic and Anti-Catholic MoveOn.org calls Fox News Racist

2008-07-24T16:18:00.000-04:00

The following is quite a mouthful from an organization that welcomed the most vicious imaginable anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic, anti-Evangelical, and even racist hate speech at an Internet forum over which it exercised editorial control, and which published an official anti-Catholic hate cartoon that shows the Pope waving a gavel in front of the U.S. Supreme Court.

PETITION AGAINST FOX'S RACIST & HATE-FILLED SMEARS: "FOX must stop injecting racism, prejudice, and fear into our political dialogue. We intend to hold FOX, its advertisers, and its personalities accountable for FOX's attempts to smear the Obamas."

In 2006, we and others forced MoveOn.org to take down its prized Action Forum by publicizing the contents: 9/11 conspiracy theories that would be right at home at the Jeff Rense Show, a literal blood libel of Jews, and a wide variety of hate speech against Jews, Catholics, and others. Now that MoveOn.org has chosen to levy an outrageous false accusation of "racism" against Fox News, we need to revisit the truth about MoveOn.org.

MoveOn.org and its supporters (e.g. the National Jewish Democratic Council) argued that MoveOn.org was not responsible for the hate speech because it was user-generated content, and that MoveOn.org "discovered" it only in August of 2006. There is, however, extensive proof that MoveOn.org exercised editorial control over the Action Forum by deleting content with which it did not agree. The Action Forum's own FAQ page says that the moderators read each entry twice, and that means they saw (and found acceptable) each piece of hate speech twice.

Now let us take a look at the kind of content that was welcomed by MoveOn.org. The Action Forum allows users to vote agreement or disagreement with each entry. Where available, we have shown the votes for the hate speech in question.

==================================
Direct quotes from MoveOn.org's Action Forum

Congressman Tom Lantos told PM Olmert of Israel that he wants to freeze the $ 230 million U.S. aid package to Lebanon. Lantos is the ranking democrat on the House Foreign Relations Comte. Lantos said, "The [Lebanese] aid package should be witheld until the Lebanese government displays responsibility". Responsibility ? Israel is guilty of war crimes in their cowardely attack on Lebanon and the whining, arrogant Jew wants Lebanon to demonstrate responsibility ! This is another example of how many Jews/Zioniosts in our Congress use the U.S. for their own greedy purposes. DUMP ISRAEL.

14 out of 17 voted to AGREE with this.

=======================

If you are a Jew and want respect;
Denounce Israel’s abuse and occupation of Palestinians for the last 50 yrs and stop spreading the lies you heard on Fox Israel News.
Condemn AIPACs manipulation of the US foreign policy.
Read and acknowledge the validity of the “Israeli Lobby” papers.
Until you do you’ll just sound like the Bush administration defending their reasons for going to war.
If you just can’t do it deny that you are Jewish.
Our parents abused some of us, some were drunks, some were divorced and some had Jewish parents. We don’t have to hang on to our past.

======================

We need your help in finding a word that is less offensive.
One that describes the Jewish congressmen and Jewish owned media that has a greater allegiance to Israel than the US. And who are demonizing Israel’s neighbors and supporting Israel’s bombing and occupation.
Read "Israeli Lobby" google it.
7 out of 8 MoveOn.org Action Forum participants voted to AGREE with this

======================

We can all see how AIPAC/Israel has taken control of America. Not to get nasty but jews have a long history of subverting governments for their own enrichment and glory to the detriment of whole societies. Many more than "6 million" have died by semetic aggression, 100's of millions even, remember the conqueror writes history. Even the roman empire feared jewish power. Over and over again, whites, particularly semites have distorted truth through their supremacist, zenophobic minds. Ariel Sharon Oct of 2001 per Kol Israel, "... Don't worry about america, we control america and the americans know it." There is a mental pathology gripping my tribe, as the native americans say, "white man have forked tongue", we must become enlightened, or we will be destroyed.

13 of 16 voted to AGREE with this

=======================

Did Anyone Watch the AlteraVista tape Showing A Missle Hole Not An Airplane Shape into the Pentagon? And many other things from video and reporters as 9/11 was happening that it isn't what it looks like.
One thing is true that we Do know: American Citizens died as pawns. Let's get to the truth, however painful it is going to be to discover. Our nation's future depends on it.
9 of 11 voted to AGREE with this

=======================

Israel has 8,000 Palestinian prisoners, Hezbollah and Hamas has 3 Israeli prisoners.
Israel is killing civilians and their children with our missiles and has never stopped stealing Palestinian land, farms, and precious aquifers.
Removing all Israeli obsessed Jews from congress would stop a lot of killing.

12 of14 voted to AGREE with this

=======================

MoveOn.org's Action Forum on why Jews deserved the Holocaust:

The Jews have 9,000 prisoners the Arabs have 3.
It’s the Jews that are trying to push the Arabs into the sea by occupying and annexing their land, bulldozing refugee camps and orchards.
The Jews are killing the Arabs on a ratio of 10 to 1.
The Palestinians live in a prison, no way in or out without passing through an abusive Jewish guard gate.
The Jews demand that the Pals. disarm prior to any negotiating of what if anything they’ll get back. That is called begging not negotiating.
Nearly 3/4 of the entire Jewish population was exterminated. If you can’t tell us why, We are stuck with logic and commonsense.
I’m saying Jews instead of Israelis because I read the Israeli newspapers, the “Israeli Lobby” papers and have seen the House vote 410-8 in support Israel while the UN typically votes 191-4 against Israel. Also the billions in aid and military equipment are conspicuous. The world court unanimously voted against Israel.
By blaming Hitler you don’t have to face the truth.
I will stop condemning Jews when they become acclimated with all people.
Stop professing to know and start reading.
9 of 12 voted to AGREE with this

==========================

Another neo-con appeared today on C-Span to defend Bush and his spying program! I am Jewish and proud of it (despite everything) but I am sick of seeing those neo-cons posing as average joes on national television to defend Bush and his lies. Since they don't have the decency or honesty to identify themselves by saying: "But you know, I am a Zionist and may be biased" and since most Americans can't tell the difference and don't have the courage to ask, maybe they should be forced to wear an Israeli flag on the lapel of their jackets. Isn't it time to tell the American people the truth, i.e. that Jews control all the media.

8 of 8 AGREE that the Jews control all the media

========================

Mr Goody-two-shoes, I hope you didn’t volunteer for Vietnam, otherwise you are just a mercenary like the others.
Did you ever wonder what the Vietnamese did to you to be killed by the millions and to have their country burned to the ground?

I wasn’t even referring to the atrocities committed in places like Abu Ghraib but to plain prostitution, the only way to survive for women and children widowed and orphaned by the US
war machine. It is a fact that a prostitute in Afghanistan costs the equivalent of 25 cents.
Now, don’t tell me you never saw a prostitute during your stay in Vietnam. Anyway I would have no way to disprove your claim because these are things heroes like you don’t brag
about.

11 of 13 AGREE to spit on our Vietnam veterans yet again

=========================

Thanks Harry, for telling it like it is. Rice and Powell ARE "house
slaves". And the "Republicans ARE like the Jews who worked for Hitler".
And Shrub IS "a tyrant and a terrorist". Harry, we need people like you
in Congress.

12 of 15 voted to AGREE with this

==========================

Nothing is being said about the five Catholic
justices,three of whom would rewrite the constitution to destroy Church/State separation. They believe that God, the bible and faith supercede our Constitution, and that our leaders are acting with divine sanction. I know that Article VI states that religion shall not be a test for public office. It does not say, however, that the Senate can not question someone who hold beliefs that are in oppostion to the constitution, which all office holders must swear to uphold. The idea of a "Unitary Executive" has been praised by Alito. He clearly believes in a hierarchial concept of government, rather than one which comes from the governed. Why was this not highlighted by the Senate and the press?

29 out of 30 voted to AGREE with this

==========================

But until
the priests are hounded down and arrested like the baby rapers they
are, the neverending cycle will continue. You want to throw a monkey
wrench in both political parties? Call for the arrest and immediate
incarceration of the Catholic Pedophiles of America. Then we
can do a little research. These priests were teachers. Find out who
their students were and do a cross reference to see how many elected
leaders were "educated" by them. Records of arrests for pedophilia have
been kept for years. Are the hotspots of pedophilia in areas where the
priests were relocated to? Until our elected leaders pursue this matter
we won't know if the people we entrust our children to are people we
can trust, or people trying to lower the age of consent to birth.

8 out of 9 voted to AGREE with this

All the above quotes were welcomed on MoveOn.org's now-disgraced Action Forum, over which MoveOn.org's moderators exercised editorial control by removing material with which MoveOn.org did not agree. Now, Eli Pariser (aka Eli Parasite, our response to Pariser's insult to General Petraeus), do you want to tell us again why Fox News is racist?

Anti-Semites for Obama (and Vice Versa)

2008-05-22T13:29:00.001-04:00

Anti-Semites for Obama (and Vice Versa)

Obama's Race Problem

2008-05-11T19:25:00.002-04:00

Obama Joins MoveOn.org's Insults to Petraeus, Catholics

2008-03-17T00:25:00.003-04:00

National Jewish Democratic Council's Response to Debate Challenge

2008-02-22T02:51:00.001-05:00

More than a week ago, Ira Forman, the head of the National "Jewish" Democratic Council (shills whose primary function is to convince Jewish voters that the anti-Semitic excrement from MoveOn.org and Al Sharpton doesn't stink) allowed himself to make the following noises: "It is time all of us— organizations and individuals— take the responsibility for outing and yes, even shaming, the purveyors of sinat chinam [baseless hatred] in our community — to protect our values and to protect our community’s genuine political interests.”

We stepped up immediately and identified ourself as one of the leaders of efforts to expose Barack Obama for cavorting openly with vicious anti-Semites, racists, and/or hate organizations like Al Sharpton, the National Action Network, Jeremiah Wright, and MoveOn.org. Since we don't see a need to say behind someone's back what we will not say to his face, we E-mailed the linked material to the NJDC to invite it to "out and shame us." We are still waiting for NJDC to show that its words are more than empty threats.

Ira Forman, James Fenimore Cooper's Last of the Mohicans has just the right words for you and your organization: "Your tongue is loud in the village, but in battle it is still. None of my young men strike the tomahawk deeper into the war-post--none of them so lightly on the Yengeese. The enemy know the shape of your back, but they have never seen the color of your eyes. Three times have they called on you to come, and as often did you forget to answer."

Voices for Obama

2008-02-18T12:48:00.002-05:00

NJDC = National Judenrat Democratic Capos (Kapos)

2008-02-18T12:31:00.006-05:00

National Jewish Democratic Council whitewashes hate speech and anti-Semites for political gain

A kapo was a concentration camp trustee while Judenrats, as described by Wikipedia, "were generally composed of leaders of the Jewish community... They were forced by the Nazis to provide Jews for use as slave labor, and to assist in the deportation of Jews to extermination camps during the Holocaust. Those who refused to follow Nazi orders or were unable to cooperate fully were frequently rounded up and shot or deported to the extermination camps themselves." Kapos and Judenrats therefore had the excuse that they had guns to their heads (literally), and that they would be killed if they did not tell other Jews that the cattle cars went to pleasant country resorts instead of extermination facilities. In contrast, no one is coercing the National Jewish Democratic Council into imitating Judenrats and kapos by whitewashing and sanitizing anti-Semites and other bigots for political gain.

There is nothing Jewish, at least in terms of values about common decency, about the National "Jewish" Democratic Council. NJDC consists of a few leaders and bloggers with Jewish names whose function is to convince Jewish voters that Barack Obama does not consort openly with anti-Semites and racists, that MoveOn.org does not promote hatred of Jews, Israel, and Catholics, and that the Jews for Jesus will turn us all into Gentiles if we don't vote for whatever the Democrats happen to be running for President.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, and the National Jewish Democratic Council rightly condemned an anti-Semitic flier that promotes Congressional candidate Nikki Tinker.

According to a report in the Memphis Commercial Appeal, [Nikki] Tinker “declined to answer” questions about the flier, which was condemned by the Anti-Defamation League. The flier reportedly states that “Memphis Congressman Steve Cohen and the JEWS HATE Jesus. So Memphis Christians must united and support ONE Black Christian to represent Memphis in the United States Congress in 2008.” [Memphis Commercial Appeal, 2/13/08 and 2/11/08]

The fact that Ms. Tinker did not condemn the flier in the strongest terms sputs her squarely behind the anti-Semitic “Jews as Christian haters” slur that has been used to incite actual pogroms. However, just as Al Sharpton is the last person in the world with any right to condemn hate symbols like nooses and burning crosses--not that these things don't deserve condemnation, but rather because Sharpton has engaged in equally reprehensible behavior himself--NJDC is the last organization on earth with any right to complain about a flier that says Jews hate Jesus. If Nikki Tinker wanted to defend this reprehensible campaign flier, all she would need to do is cite NJDC's own Web site. Anyone who looks at NJDC's "Bubbie versus Christians, Ministers, Jesus, and Crosses," also known as "Bubbie versus the GOP," might conclude that NJDC itself is promoting anti-Christian hatred. We assure them that NJDC is no more representative of genuine Jews than the Ku Klux Klan represents anything but the absolute dregs of Caucasian society.

If someone put a Star of David where that cross is--and many anti-Semitic hate cartoons do exactly that--most of us would agree that the picture is anti-Semitic. Under this impartial standard, then, this is an anti-Christian hate picture that has nothing to do with Bubbie fighting the GOP.
Bubbie versus the GOP is far from the only instance of anti-Christian hate speech or defamation by the National Judenrat Democratic Capos (Kapos), as shown by its smear of a Christian computer game.

Pentagon Came Close to Distributing “Convert or Kill” Video Game Promoting Murder of Non-Christians to American Troops by Rebecca Murow says,

Believe it or not, the Pentagon came close last week to sending out a video game that rewards gamers “for how effectively they role play the killing of those who resist becoming a born again Christian.”

You know the one, last winter’s “Left Behind: Eternal Forces.” The one that endorses a theology that believes Jews and other non-Christians must convert or be killed. The one in which the “good guys” are a Christian coalition fighting against the “bad guys” (a UN-like peace-keeping group). The game condemned by the ADL, the Christian Alliance for Progress, and others. The one you would probably not want your children to play.

We downloaded the demo version of the game and the statement “rewards gamers for how effectively they role play the killing of those who resist becoming a born again Christian” is, like most of what the National Judenrat Democratic Capos say, an outright lie. While the Christians can train soldiers to protect them from the forces of evil, their primary goal is to turn Evil units neutral with Christian music, and then have missionaries convert the neutral units to the side of Good. (Evil rock musicians meanwhile try to turn Good units neutral so they can be brought over to the Evil side by Evil recruiters.) Good units replenish their Spirit Points by praying, and Evil units can resist the influence of the Christian music by swearing. In any event, NJDC's statement about "Left Behind: Eternal Forces" is simply not true--like most of what NJDC says.

Real Jews recognize Christian values as similar if not identical to Jewish values, even though our theology may differ from Christian theology. Only NJDC seems to hate Jesus and Christians in general, or is at least willing to promote sinat chinam (baseless hatred) of Christians and Christian symbols to get gullible Jews to vote for its candidates. NJDC is nothing more than a political pimp that tries to sell the name of Judaism for pure political gain the way a real pimp sells a woman's body on the streets, and this brings us to our next topic.

Exeter: Scorn and defiance, slight regard, contempt
And any thing that may not misbecome
The mighty sender, doth he prize you at.
---King Henry V

Several days ago, NJDC leader Ira Forman wrote, “It is time all of us— organizations and individuals— take the responsibility for outing and yes, even shaming, the purveyors of sinat chinam [baseless hatred] in our community — to protect our values and to protect our community’s genuine political interests.” We stepped up immediately and said openly that we are among the leaders of efforts to expose Barack Obama for cavorting openly with anti-Semites, Israel-haters, and racists in the bargain. We challenged NJDC to "out and yes, even shame us" in a point/counterpart debate in the New York Jewish Week and the Jerusalem Post, noting that Forman's piece appeared in the former while citing the latter. We have yet to receive any reply either through our E-mail or at NJDC's blog, which reinforces our long-held perception of NJDC. It may nip at an opponent's heel like a snake or a rat but, when anyone confronts or challenges it on open ground, it scurries back under its rock or into its hole. We will conclude from this behavior that NJDC is the weaker power in this controversy, it can and should be attacked at will, and it will have to take whatever we choose to throw at it. As Election Day draws closer, we will use NJDC's own statements to prove that the Democratic nominee is unfit to be President, and we will encourage the McCain or Huckabee campaign to use this material as well.

Our readers may ask why we dislike the NJDC. We can have an honest and open disagreement with someone we respect, but we have nothing but utter contempt for self-serving liars with double standards: one set for their side and another for ours, as shown by some of the things NJDC has said about John McCain and especially Mitt Romney. Our initial interaction with this organization was in 2006, when NJDC, like a Judenrat or kapo, used its nominally Jewish identity to whitewash vicious anti-Semitic (and other) hate speech at MoveOn.org's now-disgraced Action Forum. It was clear that NJDC cared more about running interference for a left-wing Democratic organization, one that says it "bought" the Democratic Party, than even passively allowing vicious bigots and their enablers to suffer the political consequences of their actions. Ira Forman was personally responsible for this whitewash:

Jewish voters should take comfort in knowing that MoveOn.org is not a haven for anti-Semitism and the organization will renounce and remove any postings of the sort. Leave it to Republicans to not allow the truth to get in the way of campaigning. Sincerely, Ira Forman Executive Director National Jewish Democratic Council

NJDC stuck with this story even after being given proof that NJDC did not even remove more than a couple of token pieces of hate speech, such as the notorious "Jew Lieberman done, Corporate Clinton is next" posting. Remarks like the following were accessible at MoveOn's now-disgraced Action Forum for weeks after Eli Pariser and Ira Forman assured us that they had been removed. They remained online, in fact, until the publicity that some of our friends generated with us forced MoveOn to take down the Action Forum for good.

Here is some of what the National Judenrat Democratic Council whitewashed and sanitized. The votes, incidentally, reflect the number of MoveOn.org Action Forum members who agreed and disagreed with the statement. All except the anti-Catholic example were harvested from the Action Forum more than two weeks after Forman and Pariser assured the public that this sort of thing was being removed. Also remember that Barack Obama solicited and has accepted this organization's endorsement.

Israel has 8,000 Palestinian prisoners, Hezbollah and Hamas has 3 Israeli prisoners.
Israel is killing civilians and their children with our missiles and has never stopped stealing Palestinian land, farms, and precious aquifers.
Removing all Israeli obsessed Jews from congress would stop a lot of killing.
12 of 14 voted to AGREE with removing all Israel-obsessed Jews from Congress.

The Jews have 9,000 prisoners the Arabs have 3.
It’s the Jews that are trying to push the Arabs into the sea by occupying and annexing their land, bulldozing refugee camps and orchards.
The Jews are killing the Arabs on a ratio of 10 to 1.
The Palestinians live in a prison, no way in or out without passing through an abusive Jewish guard gate.
The Jews demand that the Pals. disarm prior to any negotiating of what if anything they’ll get back. That is called begging not negotiating.
Nearly 3/4 of the entire Jewish population was exterminated. If you can’t tell us why, We are stuck with logic and commonsense.
I’m saying Jews instead of Israelis because I read the Israeli newspapers, the “Israeli Lobby” papers and have seen the House vote 410-8 in support Israel while the UN typically votes 191-4 against Israel. Also the billions in aid and military equipment are conspicuous. The world court unanimously voted against Israel.
By blaming Hitler you don’t have to face the truth.
I will stop condemning Jews when they become acclimated with all people.
Stop professing to know and start reading.
9 of 12 voted to AGREE that Jews did "something" to deserve the Holocaust.

We can all see how AIPAC/Israel has taken control of America. Not to get nasty but jews have a long history of subverting governments for their own enrichment and glory to the detriment of whole societies. Many more than "6 million" have died by semetic aggression, 100's of millions even, remember the conqueror writes history. Even the roman empire feared jewish power. Over and over again, whites, particularly semites have distorted truth through their supremacist, zenophobic minds. Ariel Sharon Oct of 2001 per Kol Israel, "... Don't worry about america, we control america and the americans know it." There is a mental pathology gripping my tribe, as the native americans say, "white man have forked tongue", we must become enlightened, or we will be destroyed.
13 of 16 voted to AGREE that "Jews have a long history of subverting governments for their own enrichment and glory to the detriment of whole societies"

Did Anyone Watch the AlteraVista tape Showing A Missle Hole Not An Airplane Shape into the Pentagon? And many other things from video and reporters as 9/11 was happening that it isn't what it looks like.
One thing is true that we Do know: American Citizens died as pawns. Let's get to the truth, however painful it is going to be to discover. Our nation's future depends on it.
9 of 11 voted to AGREE with this 9/11 Denial (9/11 Denial is like Holocaust denial, except it whitewashes, denies, or explains away four missing airplanes and two missing skyscrapers instead of six million missing Jews and three million missing Polish Catholics.)

Another neo-con appeared today on C-Span to defend Bush and his spying program! I am Jewish and proud of it (despite everything) but I am sick of seeing those neo-cons posing as average joes on national television to defend Bush and his lies. Since they don't have the decency or honesty to identify themselves by saying: "But you know, I am a Zionist and may be biased" and since most Americans can't tell the difference and don't have the courage to ask, maybe they should be forced to wear an Israeli flag on the lapel of their jackets. [How about a yellow Star of David?] Isn't it time to tell the American people the truth, i.e. that Jews control all the media.
8 of 8 AGREE that the Jews control all the media

Racism is unacceptable, and Zionism is racism.
13 of 16 voted to AGREE with that Zionism is racism.

Thanks Harry, for telling it like it is. Rice and Powell ARE "house slaves". And the "Republicans ARE like the Jews who worked for Hitler". And Shrub IS "a tyrant and a terrorist". Harry, we need people like you in Congress.
12 of 15 voted to AGREE with this racist slur

But until the priests are hounded down and arrested like the baby rapers they are, the neverending cycle will continue. You want to throw a monkey wrench in both political parties? Call for the arrest and immediate incarceration of the Catholic Pedophiles of America.
8 out of 9 voted to AGREE with this

The anti-Catholic hate may have been encouraged by MoveOn.org's official photomanipulation of Pope Benedict waving a gavel in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, while an offical MoveOn.org bulletin blamed Israel for renewed Palestinian violence while citing the Electronic Intifada as a reference.

Now let us return to the noises that NJDC allowed itself to make about sinat chinam, or baseless hatred.

For an example of how sinat chinam is beginning to inject itself into our community’s discourse, one need only look at the recent smears against Senator Obama aimed at Jewish voters. What started as fallacious emails claiming the senator is Muslim, was sworn in on the Koran, and cavorts with anti-Semites, etc., has now made its way into semi-respectable websites and even onto the op-ed page of the Jerusalem Post.

We have never said that Obama is a Muslim, and we have in fact denounced this fallacious slur. First, it's not true. Second, we find the use of "Muslim" (as opposed to Islamic supremacist) in the context of implying that someone is not fit to hold office repugnant. Keith Ellison, not Obama, took his oath of office on a Koran. As for cavorting with anti-Semites, though, the following picture speaks for itself. We are not surprised that NJDC, having blustered about outing and shaming us, crawled back into its hole and pulled the hole in after it when we called its bluff.

Senator Barack Obama (Ill): “Reverend Sharpton is a voice for the voiceless, and a voice for the dispossessed. What National Action Network has done is so important to change America, and it must be changed from the bottom up.”

One of the things the National Action Network did to change America was, of course, to march around a Jewish-owned store while screaming racial and anti-Semitic epithets like "Bloodsucking Jews," "Jew bastard," "see that the cracker suffers," "Don't give the Jew a dime," and, this one from Sharpton himself, "white interloper." Come on, Mr. Forman, we are standing here openly and waiting for you and your organization to out and shame us for saying that Obama cavorts with anti-Semites. As shown above, Obama does indeed cavort with anti-Semites and racists, and Sharpton is not the only one. To Sharpton we add MoveOn.org (anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, anti-Catholic) whose support Obama solicited and accepted, and Jeremiah Wright (racist, anti-Israel, anti-American). As we stated earlier, King Henry V is among our favorite role models, and he had just the words for this situation.

Take a trumpet, herald;
Ride thou unto the horsemen on yon hill:
If they will fight with us, bid them come down,
Or void the field; they do offend our sight.
If they’ll do neither, we will come to them,
And make them skirr away, as swift as stones
Enforced from the old Assyrian slings.

We expect NJDC to stonewall on this as it has on everything else, but it should take the last part of this quote seriously. We mean to bring the battle to NJDC during the general election, and exploit NJDC as a weak point in the Democratic line through which a decisive breakthrough can be made. Noting that NJDC condemned Ron Paul, and rightly so, for passive acceptance of support from the Stormfront White Nationalist Community, Obama is damned even further for actually going to Sharpton and MoveOn.org. Noting that MoveOn.org condemned Mitt Romney for making a speech at the museum of long-dead EX-antisemite Henry Ford, what are we to say of Obama posing arm in arm with a live and unrepentant one?

We encourage Republicans to take careful note of all these things, and use them against NJDC and the Democratic nominee during the months that lead up to the general election.

Point/Counterpoint challenge to NJDC re: "No Place For Slander In Jewish Discourse"

2008-02-13T13:08:00.000-05:00

To: NJDC, New York Jewish Week, Jerusalem Post
cc: online blogs, Republican Jewish Coalition

Gentlemen,

We read Ira Forman's "No Place For Slander In Jewish Discourse" (http://njdc.typepad.com/njdcs_blog/2008/02/njdc-executiv-1.html) at the National Jewish Democratic Council's blog and New York Jewish Week. The opinion piece also cites the Jerusalem Post, which we have copied on this letter.

The National Jewish Democratic Council wrote, "It is time all of us— organizations and individuals— take the responsibility for outing and yes, even shaming, the purveyors of sinat chinam [baseless hatred] in our community — to protect our values and to protect our community's genuine political interests."

We are among the leaders of efforts to expose Barack Obama for "cavorting with anti-Semites," to use the opinion piece's terms, although we also denounce the baseless accusations about Obama being a Muslim. First, it's not true. Obama belongs to a Christian church whose pastor (Jeremiah Wright) says that "white America" got its "wake up call" after 9/11 and that Israel is occupying Palestinian land illegally. Second, even if it were true, we would find the argument "Obama is a Muslim" (as opposed to an Islamic supremacist, which is to a Muslim what a white supremacist is to a Caucasian) as offensive as the argument that being a Jew,* Catholic,** Negro, or woman should disqualify someone from holding office. Third, Obama did not take his oath of office on a Koran; this was Keith Ellison (D-MN).

Obama recently accepted the endorsement of MoveOn.org, which published an official bulletin that cited the Electronic Intifada as a reference while effectively blaming Israel for the resumption of Palestinian violence. This organization's now-disgraced Action Forum served as a platform for the most vicious imaginable anti-Semitic hate speech, including a blood libel about the Talmud and statements about Jews controlling all the media. Hate speech was also directed against Catholics, Evangelical Christians, and even African-Americans. It is a matter of record that the moderators who were exercising editorial control over the forum exercised this control in favor of the hate speech while deleting comments with which they did not agree.

Furthermore, MoveOn.org lied about removing more than a few token pieces of hate speech such as the infamous "Jew Lieberman" entry. We amassed a huge collection of the Action Forum's bigotry weeks after MoveOn said it had deleted this material. MoveOn.org later published a vicious insult to General David Petraeus and, if Obama is going to give credibility to this organization by soliciting and accepting its endorsement, he is totally unfit to hold any position of public trust or responsibility in this country.

The standards set by NJDC itself support the above position. NJDC condemned Ron Paul for accepting $500 from Don Black, a former Ku Klux Klansman who runs the Stormfront White Nationalist Community. We agreed, and we demanded in our online blog postings (cc: Ron Paul campaign headquarters) that Ron Paul repudiate and disown the Ron Paul for President banner ads that appear at Stormfront's Web site. We added that Ronald Reagan was very quick to denounce and refuse the Ku Klux Klan's attempts to endorse him. The same standard obviously applies to Obama's acceptance of MoveOn.org's endorsement, and even more so to his active solicitation of Al Sharpton's support.

We also remember that the NJDC stepped in to give MoveOn.org a thorough whitewash: "Jewish voters should take comfort in knowing that MoveOn.org is not a haven for anti-Semitism and the organization will renounce and remove any postings of the sort. Leave it to Republicans to not allow the truth to get in the way of campaigning. Sincerely, Ira Forman Executive Director National Jewish Democratic Council." NJDC stuck with this story despite being presented with the Action Forum's own FAQ page, which says that the moderators read every entry twice (thus showing that MoveOn was fully aware of comments like "Israeli-obsessed Jews" and "the Catholics are raping your children.").

The bottom line is that Obama appeared with, and endorsed in the highest terms, Al Sharpton and his National Action Network. This organization, under Sharpton's leadership and personal supervision, shouted racial and anti-Semitic epithets at a Jewish-owned store in Harlem, Freddy's Fashion Mart. The NAN used terms like "bloodsucking Jew," "Jew bastard," "see that this cracker suffers," and "cracker lover" (a Black person with white friends, the counterpart of what the Ku Klux Klan calls a Negro lover, except "Negro" is not the word they use). Sharpton personally added "white interloper" to the hate speech. A deranged individual later set the store on fire while killing seven people. To this may be added the reenactment of the Night of the Broken Glass in Crown Heights and the killing of Yankel Rosenbaum, again in the aftermath of one of Sharpton's anti-Semitic tirades. There is also, of course, the matter of the racist Tawana Brawley scandal in which Sharpton played a central role.

If the NJDC can actually excuse or explain away Obama's promotion and endorsement of this individual and his organization, we would credit NJDC with a deed that far surpasses the legend of Daniel Webster, whose eloquence got Jabez Stone out of a contract with the Devil. Of course, Benet's "The Devil and Daniel Webster" is a fictional story, and we doubt that NJDC can do anything to keep us from exposing Obama for what he is: a phony smile on top of an empty suit. Furthermore, NJDC condemned Mitt Romney for appearing at the Henry Ford Museum while citing Ford's publication of anti-Semitic material. To quote one of our favorite role models,

For your own reasons turn into your bosoms,
As dogs upon their masters, worrying you.
--King Henry V, Act II, Scene 2

Had NJDC read this excellent piece of wisdom, it would not itself have set a standard that easily disqualifies Obama from receiving anyone's vote. If Romney should not be President because he made a speech at the museum of a long-dead EX-antisemite, noting that Ford retracted and repudiated "The International Jew," then what are we to say of Obama's public appearances with live and unrepentant ones? As far as we know, Sharpton and the NAN never apologized for Freddy's Fashion Mart, Crown Heights, or Tawana Brawley, nor did they even try to make things right with the people and communities they harmed.

To again quote one of our favorite role models:

Take a trumpet, herald;
Ride thou unto the horsemen on yon hill:
If they will fight with us, bid them come down,
Or void the field; they do offend our sight.

which is Shakespearean for "Either put up or stand down." If the NJDC wishes to stand behind what it wrote by outing and shaming us, we will be delighted, with your publication's assistance, to accommodate NJDC in a point/counterpoint exchange on your opinion pages. If NJDC is not willing to stand behind its words, though, we really think it needs to stop accusing Obama's detractors of "smearing" him and purveying sinat chinam.

Regards,
[home phone number given]

* as in "Jew Lieberman" and "whining, arrogant Jew [Tom Lantos]" to use the terminology of Obama's backers at MoveOn.org.
** as in "Catholic pedophiles of America," to use the terminology of Obama's friends at MoveOn.org.

Obama's Hate-Filled Entourage Grows

2008-02-03T15:38:00.000-05:00

Bigots of a Feather Flock Together: Obama accepts support from anti-Catholic and anti-Semitic hate group

Why is it that, every time Barack Obama and his shills at the National Jewish Democratic Council try to persuade us that he has nothing against Jews or white people in general, he does something to convince us that he is right at home with the country's worst hate-mongers? We have already documented Obama's ties to the racist pastor Jeremiah Wright and the prominent racist and anti-Semite Al Sharpton extensively

Senator Barack Obama (Ill): “Reverend Sharpton is a voice for the voiceless, and a voice for the dispossessed. What National Action Network has done is so important to change America, and it must be changed from the bottom up.” Having praised and endorsed an individual who was at least indirectly involved in two fatal hate crimes (Crown Heights riots, arson of Freddy's Fashion Mart), Obama has now added the anti-Catholic and anti-Semitic hate group MoveOn.org to his growing entourage of bigots and hate-mongers.

Bloodsucking Jews, Jew bastards, crackers, and white interlopers
First, however, let us recap what Obama's friend Al Sharpton and his National Action Network have done to change America. Per Fred Siegel’s “Democrats Embrace ‘Impresario of Hatred’” at http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110004192

It would have taken no great effort for the reporters covering the Apollo debate to have walked across 125th Street from the theater to visit Freddy’s Fashion Mart, where in 1995 eight people died in a murderous rampage inspired by Mr. Sharpton. Mr. Sharpton is best-known for the Tawana Brawley hoax, in which he insisted that a 15-year-old black girl had been abducted and raped by a band of white men practicing Irish Republican Army rituals. In fact she had made up the story to protect herself from her violent stepfather. But at Freddy’s, Mr. Sharpton was even more malevolent. He turned a landlord-tenant dispute between the Jewish owner of Freddy’s and a black subtenant into a theater of hatred. Picketers from Mr. Sharpton’s National Action Network, sometimes joined by “the Rev.” himself, marched daily outside the store, screaming about “bloodsucking Jews” and “Jew bastards” and threatening to burn the building down. After weeks of increasingly violent rhetoric, one of the protesters, Roland Smith, took Mr. Sharpton’s words about ousting the “white interloper” to heart. He ran into the store shouting, “It’s on!” He shot and wounded three whites and a Pakistani, whom he apparently mistook for a Jew. Then he set the fire, which killed five Hispanics, one Guyanese and one African-American—a security guard whom protesters had taunted as a “cracker lover.” Smith then fatally shot himself.

This is what Barack Obama is praising and promoting: hate speech and a hate crime that differs from Ku Klux Klan cross burnings and lynchings only with respect to the skin colors of the perpetrators and victims. An individual who does this does not even belong in the Illinois State Legislature, let alone the United States Senate. Promotion of racial, religious, or ethnic hatred shows a very serious character defect, and it is a sad commentary on our nation that Obama has gotten more than the votes of an extremist lunatic fringe.

This is not the only anti-Semitic pogram that Obama's friend Al Sharpton played at least an indirect role in inciting. “Power Dem” by Jay Nordlinger (http://www.nationalreview.com/20Mar00/nordlinger032000.html) adds,

August of 1991 saw “Crown Heights,” the period of madness that began when a car driven by a Hasidic Jew careened out of control, killing a seven-year-old black child, Gavin Cato. Riots broke out. A rabbinical student, Yankel Rosenbaum, was lynched. Over a hundred others were injured. The city was on the verge of breaking apart. And here is what Al Sharpton had to say, in one of the most vile orations of his career, noxious with slanders familiar and novel:
The world will tell us that [Gavin Cato] was killed by accident. . . . What type of city do we have that would allow politics to rise above the blood of innocent babies? . . . Talk about how Oppenheimer in South Africa sends diamonds straight to Tel Aviv and deals with the diamond merchants right here in Crown Heights.
…Sharpton’s rhetoric could also be rather less high-flown. “If the Jews want to get it on,” he said, “tell them to pin their yarmulkes back and come over to my house.”
…But the torching, so to speak, continued. In 1995-four years into the putative New Sharpton-there was another, fatal case in which Sharpton had a guilty hand: Freddy’s Fashion Mart. In Harlem, a white store owner — no, worse: a Jewish one — was accused of driving a black store owner out of business. At one of the many rallies meant to scare the Jewish owner away, Sharpton charged that “there is a systemic and methodical strategy to eliminate our people from doing business off 125th Street. I want to make it clear . . . that we will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business.” Sharpton’s colleague, Morris Powell, said of the Jewish owner—Sharpton’s “white interloper”— “We’re going to see that this cracker suffers. Reverend Sharpton is on it.”

Right, Obama: "see that this cracker suffers." We savvy. We savvy plenty. On a final note, we remind our readers that the Obama campaign answered our protest regarding Obama’s promotion of Sharpton with what is at best a highly patronizing brushoff, if not a deliberate insult. Then there is the matter of Obama's racist pastor, Jeremiah Wright, who says "white America" got its "wake-up call" on 9/11.

Having already surrounded himself with racists and Jew-haters, Obama rounds out his complement of professional and amateur bigots with MoveOn.org. It is a proven matter of record that MoveOn's moderators and Action Forum monitors exercised editorial control in favor of commentary like this:

Congressman Tom Lantos told PM Olmert of Israel that he wants to freeze the $ 230 million U.S. aid package to Lebanon. Lantos is the ranking democrat on the House Foreign Relations Comte. Lantos said, "The [Lebanese] aid package should be witheld until the Lebanese government displays responsibility". Responsibility ? Israel is guilty of war crimes in their cowardely attack on Lebanon and the whining, arrogant Jew wants Lebanon to demonstrate responsibility ! This is another example of how many Jews/Zioniosts in our Congress use the U.S. for their own greedy purposes. DUMP ISRAEL.
14 out of 17 voted to AGREE with this.

That is, of the 17 MoveOn.org people who voted on this statement, 14 agreed with it.

We can all see how AIPAC/Israel has taken control of America. Not to get nasty but jews have a long history of subverting governments for their own enrichment and glory to the detriment of whole societies. Many more than "6 million" have died by semetic aggression, 100's of millions even, remember the conqueror writes history. Even the roman empire feared jewish power. Over and over again, whites, particularly semites have distorted truth through their supremacist, zenophobic minds. Ariel Sharon Oct of 2001 per Kol Israel, "... Don't worry about america, we control america and the americans know it." There is a mental pathology gripping my tribe, as the native americans say, "white man have forked tongue", we must become enlightened, or we will be destroyed.
13 of 16 voted to AGREE with this

10 out of 13 MoveOn people voted agreement with an outright blood libel of Jews.

In truth, Zionists have committed more massacres per capita than any other people on earth since Adam and Eve. In fact, one can safely say that wanton killings and massacres are piece and parcel of being Zionist.
I understand that there are Jews who condemn the pornographic slaughter in Gaza, people like Uri Avneri and like-minded Jews. We salute those people, who are our natural partners in the quest for a just and durable peace in Palestine.
However, it is also true that the vast bulk of Israeli Jews are enjoying the killings of Palestinian children and are congratulating each other.
Just take a look at Jewish internet sites in Israel and abroad and see how Jewish youngsters are congratulating each other on the killings of these helpless toddlers in Gaza.
This murderous cannibalism doesn’t come out of the blue. Today in Israel, school curricula are dominated by the Talmud, especially a specific Talmudic text called Shulhan Aruch.
In this text, Jews are commanded to slaughter non-Jews who are viewed more or less as animals or at least lesser human beings.

"Get the Israel obsessed Jews out of Congress"

Removing all Israeli obsessed Jews from congress would stop a lot of killing.
12 of 14 voted to AGREE with this

Condoleeza Rice and Colin Powell are House Slaves

Thanks Harry, for telling it like it is. Rice and Powell ARE "house slaves". And the "Republicans ARE like the Jews who worked for Hitler". And Shrub IS "a tyrant and a terrorist". Harry, we need people like you in Congress.
12 of 15 voted to AGREE with this

Shills like the National Jewish Democratic Council have argued that MoveOn.org is not accountable for these statements because they appeared on an open forum to which anyone could post. This, like most of the other things NJDC says, is simply not true.

(1) MoveOn.org exercised editorial control in favor of the hate speech. "Exercise of editorial control" makes MoveOn.org responsible for it.
(2) MoveOn.org's own FAQ page says the moderators saw each piece of hate speech at least twice. In other words, Eli Pariser lied about MoveOn.org not knowing about the hate speech.

How can I make sure someone at MoveOn reads my post ? All comments are read at least twice. While there is no single criteria, comments that suggest a possible MoveOn action and are not duplicative are likely to be immediately passed on, or included in a summary to the whole MoveOn team. Ratings, while important, are not definitive and some comments with few or low ratings are included in the summaries. Important issues are sometimes followed up with a survey to a sampling of the membership.

(3) Jan Poller's letter of April 1 2004 is further proof that MoveOn.org knew about the hate speech.

Furthermore, an official MoveOn.org bulletin looks like it could have been written by the International Solidarity Movement. It even cites the Electronic Intifada. Obama says from one side of his mouth that he is pro-Israel, but almost every single action he takes suggests that he is on the side of the terrorists. He is even on record as praising terrorists.

MoveOn.org's hate speech was hardly confined to promotion of hatred for Jews, and MoveOn.org cannot argue that this picture came from unknown contributors to its Action Forum. This was an official publication of MoveOn.org itself, and it differs from 19th century cartoonist Thomas Nast's creation only in its use of color.

As shown here, Barack Obama really wants these people's support.

Now let's return to what Obama's new set of friends has to say about Jews, Catholics, and other groups.

I respect everybody's opinion but obviously some people hate Jews. I am sure they have their reasons but they should not let whatever bad experience they had with some Jews (and I am sure they had some) interfere with their judgment.
9 of 10 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE

MoveOn.org: Jews control all the media

But I can see why you might think you OWN! the media,or are entitled to: 8 JEWS RUN U.S. MEDIA Today, eight Jewish Americans run the vast majority of US television networks, the printed press, the Hollywood movie industry, the book publishing industry, and the recording industry.

MoveOn.org: African-American soldiers are potential mutineers who cannot be trusted with weapons

For Blacks to receive the discipline basically the military have to offer, and minorities are so much in need, I would suggest that they recruit Blacks, keep them in safe positions state side and not allow them a weapon, because they may use it against those they perceive to be their enemy.
10 out of 13 agree

MoveOn.org: Evangelical Christians commit election fraud

"Fooled Again: How the Right Stole the 2004 election and why they'll steal the next one too (unless we stop them" is his book. He says the use of the Diebolt computer voting machines and the use of large number of evangelicals to man polling booths created widespread electoral fraud, not just in Ohio. Three states have now rejected Diebolt machines and a month ago the CEO of Diebolt resigned. We must get paper trails in every state.
127 out of 131 agree that Evangelicals created widespread election fraud

Noting that the Clinton campaign has accused the Obama campaign of electoral misconduct in Nevada, including intimidation of voters, election fraud is perhaps a topic that Obama and his friends may wish to avoid.

MoveOn.org: Israel should not exist (a position backed by its official bulletin)

To be anti-Zionist, or even anti-Jewish, is not by definition anti-Semitic. According to what I've read, the Arabs, Jews, and others are all Semitic. It is not a question of Race, it is a question of justice. Anyone who takes the time to become familiar with the history of the creation of, and the acts of the Jewish State of Israel can come to no other conclusion that it should not exist where it does in the first place.

MoveOn.org and the Catholic Pedophiles of America

But until the priests are hounded down and arrested like the baby rapers they are, the neverending cycle will continue. You want to throw a monkey wrench in both political parties? Call for the arrest and immediate incarceration of the Catholic Pedophiles of America. Then we can do a little research. These priests were teachers. Find out who their students were and do a cross reference to see how many elected leaders were "educated" by them. Records of arrests for pedophilia have been kept for years. Are the hotspots of pedophilia in areas where the priests were relocated to? Until our elected leaders pursue this matter we won't know if the people we entrust our children to are people we can trust, or people trying to lower the age of consent to birth.
8 out of 9 voted to AGREE with this

MoveOn.org: "The Catholics are Raping Your Children"

The vicitm class will expand until you too can be jailed for ridiculously minor offenses while the Catholics are raping your children.
94% voted to AGREE that the Catholics are raping your children.

MoveOn.org is the enemy of civilized discourse, and Barack Obama stands with MoveOn.org--along with Al Sharpton, the National Action Network, Jeremiah Wright, and indeed too many racists, anti-Semites, Catholic-baiters, and other haters to keep track of conveniently.

Clinton and Obama Campaigns Accuse Each Other of Voter Intimidation and Election Misconduct

2008-01-26T13:04:00.000-05:00

Is this the kind of person whom you want with her/his hands on the United States 3000-plus nuclear weapons? The alleged behavior is suitable for a banana republic, Third World dictatorship, or Neo-Tsar Vladimir Putin's Russia, not for the United States.

From http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/hqblog and also http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/2008/images/01/23/nv001.pdf

January 22, 2008

Jill Derby, Chair
Nevada State Democratic Party
1210 S. Valley View Road
Suite 114
Las Vegas, NV 89102

Dear Chair Derby:

On behalf of the Obama for America campaign, I am writing to request that the Nevada State Democratic Party conduct an inquiry into an apparent and disturbing pattern of incidents reported at precinct locations throughout the state during the January 19 Caucus.

These reports suggest the possibility of activity conducted in violation of Party rules and the rights of voters—activity that, as the volume and distribution of those complaints indicate, may have been planned and coordinated with the willful intention to distort the process in the favor of one candidate, Senator Clinton. A sheet of instructions provided by the Clinton campaign to its precinct works captures its program for the Caucus: "It's not illegal unless they [the temporary precinct chairs] tell you so." (See attachment). This certainly suggests that, for the Clinton campaign, the operative standard of conduct was, simply and only, what it could get away with.

On the day of the Caucus, we received by phone reports of misconduct, violations of the rules and irregularities, in the hundreds. Since that time, well over a thousand more accounts have been sent to us. Others have begun to emerge in other sources. http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/01/sleaze-in-nevad.html#more

At the outset, we wish to make clear what the inquiry we are requesting is not intended to accomplish. We are not seeking to challenge the outcome of the Caucuses at the precinct level.

Nor is it our intention to question the extraordinary efforts devoted by the NSDP to the organization and conduct of the Caucus, including the contribution its leadership made to resolve the high volume of questions and problems that exploded during the caucusing. Indeed, the Party responded promptly and effectively to the frontal attack on the Caucus in the form of an eleventh hour legal action by Senator Clinton’s allies, intended to shut down voting locations or to put into question the legitimacy of the process.

The question raised here about activities on Caucus Day concerns solely the tactics employed by one campaign and their effects—their intended and actual effects—on the participation of voters supporting other candidates. Participation is a principle second to none in importance to the Democratic Party, emphasized throughout the national party’s rules, as well those of the Nevada party.

Nature of Suppressive and Other Improper Activity

We have attempted to sort through the range of reports received, and while our own review has not been completed in the short time since the conclusion of the Caucus, we suggest that the evidence supports an inquiry focused on the following:

Door closings

As you know, and as their own training materials confirm, the Clinton campaign informed its precinct captains that the doors should close—and registration should end—at 11:30 am. This is, of course, false: the rules could not be clearer that any voter wishing to participate would until 12:00 pm take his or her place in line. What the rules clearly specify is repeated, with equal clarity, in the party’s own Guide to the Caucuses.

It seems inconceivable that a well-financed and nationally organized campaign, stressing a platform of competence and experience, could have inadvertently misunderstood a rule of first importance to the Caucus. It is a rule governing participation and intended to encourage it. Any preparation for the Caucus would have included careful attention to any such rules of eligibility.

Yet the Manual put out by the Clinton campaign stated a false statement of the “closed door” rules.

Voters have given these reports, which are representative of others received like them:

• "It happened at my caucus site and it happened, apparently, at every caucus site in Southern Nevada, as I spoke to dozens of Barack volunteers from other caucus sites who all said the same thing. At 11:30, the Hillary supporters were clamoring to have the doors closed, saying that the caucus was supposed to start at 11:30 and the doors should be closed immediately. The theory was that if a number of different people asked the caucus chair to close the doors at 11:30, some caucus chairs might believe that 11:30 was indeed the official door-closing time and would close the doors. This appeared to be the case and a number of caucus locations across the Vegas area, from my own first-hand (random but small) sample.

Apparently, Hillary's strategy was to tell her supporters to get there early, and have the doors close 30 minutes prior to their prescribed time, thereby shutting out some Barack supporters who might be a little late."

• "Those Hillary people…closed the doors on our people and we had to call the cops in some precincts to have locks cut from doors, [they] slipped people in the back doors, they sent people home at 11:30 when it was illegal to prevent people from voting before noon."

• “Issue one was when the temporary chairman locked the doors at 1:30 preventing at least two caucus participants at 11:34 and 11:40 from entering. He stated that the rules were to close the doors at 11:30. Immediately stated that I was informed that the doors were to close at 12:00 but was rebuffed.”

• “The Precinct 16 Caucus Chair...ordered the doors locked at 11:30 am. not 12 noon. I objected and called the hotline, and [the Chair] relented, but not before many voters were prevented from entering.”

Obstructing Voter Access

Voters have given these reports, which are representative of others received like them:

• “While my precinct ran well due to the fact that we had only 24 caucus members present, there was mass confusion in the five other larger precincts at the same site. Obama people were being told my Clinton supporters that they could not register because the sign-in sheet was only for Clinton voters.”

• “In Precinct 21, a Democratic worker …(who was clearly for Hillary) refused to register Obama supporters and said she was only registering Hillary supporters.”

• “Someone told Obama supporters they had to wait until 11:30 to enter because Republicans were voting. (A Clinton supporter in front of the School.) There were many Clinton supporters telling Obama supporters to leave. A Clinton supporter took our bottles of water, and then tried to take our box containing precinct packet and voter registration forms. I had to run her down in the crowd. By the time I located her (with help)she had thrown things out, but kept the water bottles in her large bag.”

• “Almost immediately, I was told by a couple of other Obama precinct leaders, whose names I don't know, that the Hillary people were turning our supporters away, by asking to see their ID's and telling them they weren't valid.”

Improper Handling of Voter Preference Cards

Voters have given these reports, which are representative of others received like them:

• “The next controversial issue involved the voter cards disappearing into the Clinton camp, so that the Edwards and Obama people were left with no cards. When we asked them to give us back some cards, we then noticed that they had all been pre-marked for Clinton.”

• “We circled Obama and were given a small slip of paper with our names and no voting ballot. We were told they were out of ballots. How convenient. It wasn't until later than I realized the Hillary group had ballots.”

• “I personally observed one of Hillary's precinct captains taking up the ballot of the voter before the caucusing started. When the delegates were moved to the other side of the room she could not find all of the people that she took their ballots she then put them in her purse, further another one of Hillary supporter collected ballots as well and she had a ballot where some one was voting for Obama she fold it up in her hand. I call her on this matter she stated that she could not find the person that it belong to.”

Process for Conducting Review

This is a smattering of the reports we have received. Emerging from them is a disturbing picture of rules violations, discriminatory treatment of voters, bullying and disrespectful behavior toward those from other campaigns, the mishandling of preference cards, and failure to follow the process specified under the rules for the conduct of the vote count.

To support the inquiry that we are asking that you conduct, we will provide them these reports, unedited or redacted, to the Party, subject to an agreement protecting the privacy of voters who have given these accounts. We are confident, however, that with the benefit of these protections, these voters, if asked, will give their first-hand recollections directly to party counsel and representatives.

We would ask that this process be expedited. It is crucial that the Party enforce its rules. And, in the interests of all voters, any and all questions about misconduct at the Caucuses should be conclusively and clearly addressed so that what seems to have occurred in Nevada on January 19 will not be repeated.
We stand ready to support and cooperate in this inquiry, and hope and expect that the same support and cooperation will be forthcoming from the Clinton campaign and any and all others with relevant information.

Very truly yours,

Robert F. Bauer

Does Hillary Clinton sound like someone we want with launch authority over more than 3000 nuclear weapons, or like Lady Macbeth, Aggripina, and Lucretia Borgia rolled into one?

And this is what the Clinton campaign has to say about the Obama campaign. (http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2008/images/01/23/nv.state.letter.1.23.08.pdf Note: any slight discrepencies between the following and the .pdf file are due to character misreads by the OCR software, although we didn't see any obvious typos other than the bullet list symbols.)

Dear Chair Derby:
I write on behalf of Hillary Clinton for President (”the Committee”) in regard to the January 19, 2008 Nevada Democratic Caucus. The Committee is aware of a letter addressed to you today from the Obama for America campaign requesting an inquiry into the conduct of the caucuses. The Committee shares the Obama campaign’s concern that full participation in the democratic process may have been compromised by the substantial number of irregularities occurring at the caucuses, and we fully support a complete inquiry by the Nevada State Democratic Party (the ”Party”) into all caucus improprieties.
This letter is not intended as a response to the Obama campaign’s letter. However, in the interest of a complete record, and in contrast to the alleged minor procedural problems noted by the Obama campaign, the Committee wishes to bring to your attention information we have received evidencing a premeditated and predesigned plan by the Obama campaign to engage in systematic corruption of the Party’s caucus procedures. Compounding this blatant distortion of the caucus rules was an egregious effort by the Obama campaign to manipulate the voter registration process in its own favor, thereby disenfranchising countless voters. Finally, the Committee has received a vast number of reliable reports of voter suppression and intimidation by the Obama campaign or its allies.
The Committee had 30 phone lines on Saturday to receive calls in its Las Vegas offices. These lines rang continuously from early morning until well after the caucuses concluded with reports from people who were victimized and who observed irregularities. The phone lines were so overwhelmed that many callers resorted to calling individual Committee staff cell phones to report that they could not get through. The Committee also received many similar calls at its national headquarters.
The Committee is confident that any investigation into the conduct of the caucuses will be thorough, fair and in the interest of insuring that future Party caucuses will be as open and democratic as possible.
Systematic Corruption of the Party’s Caucus Procedures
The Committee received substantially similar reports of improprieties of such a number as to leave no conclusion but that the Obama campaign and its allies and supporters engaged in a planned effort to subvert the Party’s caucus procedures to its advantage. For example:
þ Preference cards were premarked for Obama.
þ Clinton supporters were denied preference cards on the basis that none were left, while Obama supporters at the same caucus sites were given preference cards.
þ Caucus chairs obviously supporting Obama:
o Deliberately miscounted votes to favor Senator Obama.
o Deliberately counted unregistered persons as Obama votes.
o Deliberately counted young children as Obama votes.
o Refused to accept preference cards from Clinton supporters who were at the caucus site by noon on the ground that the cards were not filled out fast enough.
o Told Clinton supporters to leave prior to electing delegates.
þ Clinton supporters who arrived late were turned away from the caucus, while late Obama supporters were admitted to the caucus.
Manipulation of the Voter Registration Process
Numerous reports received by the Committee demonstrate a concerted effort on the part of the Obama campaign and its supporters to prevent eligible voters supporting a candidate other than Senator Obama from caucusing. The Obama supporters complained of were acting in positions of authority at the caucus sites. Some of these reports are as follows:
þ Obama supporters wrongly informed Clinton supporters that they were not allowed to participate in the caucus if their names were not on the voter rolls. However, Obama supporters whose names did not appear on the voter rolls were permitted to register at the caucus site.
þ Obama supporters falsely informed Clinton supporters that no registration forms were available for them to register to vote at the caucus site.
þ Obama supporters wrongly told Clinton supporters who were attempting to caucus at the wrong precinct that they could not caucus at that site, while simultaneously permitting Obama supporters at the wrong precinct to participate.
þ Obama supporters were allowed to move to the front of the registration and sign-in line.
Voter Suppression and Intimidation
The Committee received a substantial number of disturbing reports from voters that they had been subject to harassment, intimidation or efforts to prevent them from voting. Some of the most egregious of these complaints are described below:
þ Voters at at-large caucus sites were informed that those sites were for Obama supporters only.
þ Clinton supporters at at-large caucus sites were told that their managers would be watching them while they caucused.
þ Workers were informed that their supervisors kept lists of Clinton and Obama supporters, and were told that they could not caucus unless their name was on the list of Obama supporters.
þ Many Clinton supporters were threatened with employment termination or other discipline if they caucused for Senator Clinton.
þ Workers were required to sign a pledge card to support Obama if they wanted time off to participate in the caucus.
þ Workers at one casino were offered a lavish lunch and permitted to attend and register to vote only if they agree to support Obama.
The complaints summarized above represent only a small sample of the complaints received by the Committee. With respect to each of these complaints and many more, the Committee has the names and phone numbers of those reporting these incidents and the specific precinct numbers where the incidents occurred. Upon request the Committee will share these with the Party with appropriate safeguards to protect these individuals from reprisal. On the whole, these reports show a troubling effort by the Obama campaign and its allies and supporters to advance their own campaign at the expense of the right of all Nevada Democrats to participate in the democratic process in a free, fair and open manner.
Senator Clinton and the Committee are wholly committed to ensuring that every eligible voter has his or her vote cast and counted. There is no place in the American electoral process for the types of voter suppression, intimidation and harassment systematically engaged in by the Obama campaign, its allies and supporters.
Sincerely,

Lyn Utrecht Counsel Hillary Clinton for President

DOES BARACK OBAMA SOUND LIKE SOMEONE WE WANT IN CONTROL OF THE UNITED STATES' NUCLEAR ARSENAL? Or does he sound more like a banana republic dictator who would be right at home in some Third World country?

MoveOn.org Can't Stop CafePress Items

2007-11-09T01:05:00.000-05:00

Although MoveOn.org's Carrie Olson attempted to intimidate CafePress and a CafePress shopkeeper into removing items that mention MoveOn.org's name (as opposed to using its trademarked red and blue logo), it has said and done absolutely nothing about our own CafePress offerings--which are far more aggressive than the material that MoveOn.org attempted to ban. Here's one we uploaded a few days ago, but others like this one have been online for a few weeks.

To quote the Earl of Uxbridge in Sharpe's Waterloo, "Once you get past the lance points, it's like killing rabbits." A lance with the full weight of a man and a horse behind it is a terrifying weapon, but terror is its ONLY virtue. George S. Patton Jr.'s Saber Exercise later included instructions on how to parry a lance with a straight-bladed sabre of his own design. Since the swordsman had the advantage of leverage over the longer weapon, a correctly-executed parry was certain to work, after which the lancer had no protection whatsoever against being run through. MoveOn can similarly do nothing more than make a lot of noise and threats over the use of its name in CafePress and similar products, and it is totally helpless against anyone who can get past the noise and threats to deal a decisive blow.

Anti-MoveOn.org Button for CafePress reproduction

2007-10-14T02:09:00.001-04:00

The following image is sized for reproduction as a button at CafePress. The caption is, "MoveOn.org: Donkey Cancer in Action" (as opposed to Democracy in Action).

Anti-MoveOn.org Yard Sign, Tote Bag

2007-10-12T22:06:00.001-04:00

Make your own at CafePress. Images are sized appropriately. Images are also released to the public domain, and you are encouraged to download, copy, and circulate them.

Tote bag, 10 inches by 10 inches

Yard sign, 22 inches wide by 15 high

Yard sign, 22 inches wide by 15 high

Anti-MoveOn.org Bumper Stickers

2007-10-12T16:58:00.000-04:00

Carrie Olson of MoveOn.org: the following bumper stickers do not use your hate group's trademarked logo (unless you really do want to lay claim to these swastikas). Therefore, you can take your lies about MoveOn.org owning the images at http://www.cafepress.com/polistew (which don't use your logo either) and shove them where it would take a VERY long colonoscope to find them again.

The following images are 1000 by 300 pixels, which are suitable for reproduction as bumper stickers at CafePress, Zazzle, and similar services. Note that you can make these yourself, and they do not have to be available at someone's online store. (In other words, we are not making a cent from these, we are providing them as a public service to expose MoveOn.org for what it is.) Our readers are encouraged to download them, copy them, and circulate them as widely as possible.

MoveOn.org Democrats "Betrayus" on Cornyn Amendment

2007-09-27T11:52:00.000-04:00

Nowhere do we see "Senator" or "Representative" in front of David Petraeus' name. General Petraeus did not get a vote on "A joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq" in late 2002. As a soldier, he has merely carried out the lawful orders he received from our civilian government. The fact that Hillary Clinton voted to give him and other soldiers those orders, but has now joined MoveOn.org in attacking his personal character, proves her unfit to direct our Armed Forces in any capacity whatsoever.

Rudyard Kipling defined the problem quite explicitly in the 19th century, and it seems that little has changed since then--at least in the Congress of the United States.

I went into a public-'ouse to get a pint o' beer,
The publican 'e up an' sez, "We serve no red-coats here."
The girls be'ind the bar they laughed an' giggled fit to die,
I outs into the street again an' to myself sez I:
O it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, go away";
But it's "Thank you, Mister Atkins", when the band begins to play,
The band begins to play, my boys, the band begins to play,
O it's "Thank you, Mister Atkins", when the band begins to play.

"Hillary Clinton Stands with MoveOn.org in Smearing Petraeus" contains the roll call vote on the Cornyn Amendment. Note that this is not a vote for or against the war. It is a vote to stand with a dedicated professional soldier who was defamed by MoveOn.org (and then subjected to what could well be libel by the Daily Kos) for doing what our civilian government told him to do.

Vote Number: 344 Vote Date: September 20, 2007, 12:36 PM

To express the sense of the Senate that General David H. Petraeus, Commanding General, Multi-National Force-Iraq, deserves the full support of the Senate and strongly condemn personal attacks on the honor and integrity of General Petraeus and all members of the United States Armed Forces.

NAYs —25 Voted to support MoveOn.org and its smear of General Petraeus Those who voted to send General Petraeus and hundreds of thousands of other men and women in uniform to Iraq in the first place (H.J.Res. 114) are so noted.

Akaka (D-HI)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Byrd (D-WV)
Clinton (D-NY) H.J.Res. 114 AYE
Dodd (D-CT) H.J.Res. 114 AYE
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Harkin (D-IA) H.J.Res. 114 AYE
Inouye (D-HI)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA) H.J.Res. 114 AYE
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Levin (D-MI)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Murray (D-WA)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV) H.J.Res. 114 AYE
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schumer (D-NY) H.J.Res. 114 AYE
Stabenow (D-MI)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

Not Voting - 3
Biden (D-DE) H.J.Res. 114 AYE
Cantwell (D-WA) H.J.Res. 114 AYE
Obama (D-IL) (refused to dignify the Cornyn measure by voting on it)

Let's take a good look at this. In October 2002, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, and the other named Democrats voted FOR "A joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq." Now that they have buyers' regrets about the war for which they voted, however, they are standing behind MoveOn.org and its defamatory advertisement that calls a distinguished Army officer "General Betrayus" while accusing him of "cooking the books for the White House."

Even a McDonald's manager knows that you don't tell an employee to do something, and then blame him when your own instructions result in a bad outcome. This is, however, exactly what Clinton, Kerry, Dodd, Reid, and Schumer have done, thus showing their total lack of fitness to hold any position whatsoever of public trust or responsibility. Rudyard Kipling had them pegged, of course, long before they were born.

I went into a theatre as sober as could be,
They gave a drunk civilian room, but 'adn't none for me;
They sent me to the gallery or round the music-'alls,
But when it comes to fightin', Lord! they'll shove me in the stalls!
For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, wait outside";
But it's "Special train for Atkins" when the trooper's on the tide,
The troopship's on the tide, my boys, the troopship's on the tide,
O it's "Special train for Atkins" when the trooper's on the tide.

Here is some additional insight into the personal characters of Hillary Clinton and John Kerry. Both bayed as loudly for Saddam Hussein's blood as anyone in the Bush Administration. Both clamored for war, but now that the war they wanted has not gone as smoothly as expected, they look for anyone to blame but themselves. Someone who is totally incapable of taking responsibility for their own choices does not belong in college student government, let alone the United States Senate.

John Kerry, 23 February 1998: “Saddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but not exactly in the Middle East.”

# Hillary Rodham Clinton, Floor Speech of 10 October 2002 (from her own Senate Web site): “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.” http://clinton.senate.gov/speeches/iraq_101002.html (and she didn't even have the brains to get it off her Web site before joining MoveOn's attack on General Petraeus).

Right. In 1998 and 2002, it was "Saddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to continue to do so," and "He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members." In 2007, Hillary Clinton said that General Petraeus' testimony to Congress required "willing suspension of disbelief." John Kerry, meanwhile, was against MoveOn.org's advertisement--he said it was "over the top"--before he voted to support it.

Yes, makin' mock o' uniforms that guard you while you sleep
Is cheaper than them uniforms, an' they're starvation cheap;
An' hustlin' drunken soldiers when they're goin' large a bit
Is five times better business than paradin' in full kit.
Then it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, 'ow's yer soul?"
But it's "Thin red line of 'eroes" when the drums begin to roll,
The drums begin to roll, my boys, the drums begin to roll,
O it's "Thin red line of 'eroes" when the drums begin to roll.

It is exactly because of gentlemen like David Petraeus that the likes of Eli Pariser of MoveOn.org are free to make up defamatory schoolyard names for him, while the likes of John F. Kerry and Hillary Rodham Clinton pile on.

Tennessee Guerilla Women defend MoveOn.org, bash Pope Benedict

2007-09-23T00:27:00.000-04:00

We wrote:

The problem with MoveOn's ad was that it attacked a distinguished soldier, and
it accused him of lying before MoveOn even heard what he had to say. In addition, MoveOn welcomed and encouraged anti-Semitic and anti-Catholic hate speech at its now-disgraced Action Forum. This was under the total editorial control of MoveOn's moderators. In addition, MoveOn published a derogatory cartoon of Pope Benedict waving a gavel in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. This will destroy any candidate who accepts MoveOn's support next November.

Here were the responses:

The truth sure does hurt, don't it?

=============

Oh NOES! Not a cartoon about der Popenführer! Holy shit, get the smelling salts!

===============

You call a cartoon of Poppa RATzinger standing in front of the supreme courty derogatory? Sir, you surely know that the hierarchy of the catholic church elected a pope who was a member of the Hitler Nazi Youth. Now I know he says he had no choice, but really do you believe that? And for 24 years prior to his election as pope he was head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, formerly known as the Holy Office of the Inquisition. Now he threatens U.S. Politicians with excommunication if they don't tow his line. That's just too much HORSESHIT and it's sad that you are among those who honor this tiny little man.

===================

For the record, we find any threat by the Church to excommunicate a politician with excommunication (e.g. for supporting abortion) a totally unacceptable attempt to influence legislation, and we have told the Church that on a couple of occasions. This is not our problem with the above statement, but rather the derision of the Pope with terms like "RATzinger" and "Popenführer." This suggests that the hate material that was posted at MoveOn.org was not a mere aberration, but quite representative of the group's feelings toward Catholics.

General "Betray Us," meet MoveOn's "Eli Parasite"

2007-09-16T13:04:00.000-04:00

It is a well known principle from anthropology that someone who can name a person or thing controls that person or thing. To do so, however, requires considerable skill and experience. The name that MoveOn.org applied to General David Petraeus, "General Betray Us," could have come from any grade school's sandbox, and it will no more stick to this distinguished soldier than water will adhere to Teflon. "Eli Parasite," our name for MoveOn.org executive director Eli Pariser, also is pretty obvious, but we will make it stick by using facts and his track record as the adhesive.

Not only did MoveOn.org publish a defamatory advertisement that made the worst possible accusations--lying and betrayal--against a distinguished military officer, MoveOn.org's Executive Director, Eli Pariser, stood behind the ad while the Daily Kos' Markos Moulitsas dismissed the ad as a nonissue. Although Markos Moulitsas deserves a little credit for not overtly backing the ad, he failed to denounce it. Eli Pariser then went on to accuse General Petraeus of "spinning the facts," thus reiterating his accusation of lying. Whom do you believe: the West Point graduate and leader of character with four stars on each shoulder and numerous service ribbons on his chest, or the two-bit lying punk?

Petraeus vs. Pariser Comparison Chart shows the immense difference between General David Petraeus and the proven liar named Eli Pariser. Pariser is not only far from being in Petraeus' league, he is not even on the same planet.

David Howell Petraeus
General, U.S. Army
Commander, Multi-National Force - Iraq
# Graduated United States Military Academy, 1974
# General George C. Marshall Award, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, 1983
# MPA and a Ph.D., Princeton University Wilson School of Public/International Affairs, 1985, 1987
# Assistant Professor of International Relations at the U.S. Military Academy
# Military fellowship, Georgetown's School of Foreign Service, 1994-95

# Defense Distinguished Service Medal
# Distinguished Service Medal (w/ Oak Leaf Clusters)
# Defense Superior Service Medal (w/ Oak Leaf Clusters)
# Legion of Merit (w/ 3 Oak Leaf Clusters)
# Bronze Star Medal (w/ “V” Device)
# Defense Meritorious Service Medal
# Meritorious Service Medal (w/ 2 Oak Leaf Clusters)
# Joint Service Commendation Medal
# Army Commendation Medal (w/ 2 Oak Leaf Clusters)
# Joint Service Achievement Medal
# Army Achievement Medal

to which we add that we looked up the two Army skill badges on his uniform. One is Parachutist or Master Parachutist (we suspect that Eli Pariser would lose control of his bladder if he so much as looked down a steep flight of stairs), and the other is Air Assault. Eli Pariser's experience with the latter probably consists of the paper airplanes he threw at classmates in grade school. Then we have:

Eli Pariser
Moveon.org
Executive Director

# Graduated Simon's Rock College
# Web page designer
# Wikipedia Editorial Team

We subscribe to the position that one does not call a gentleman a liar, but Eli Pariser is no gentlemen. Eli Pariser is, in fact, exactly what he called his better: a liar.

This is what MoveOn.org's Eli Pariser told the public, and also Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League, on 2 September 2006.

Statement On ActionForum Comments.
Statement from Eli Pariser, MoveOn.org Political Action
“MoveOn’s ActionForum is an open forum where members of the public and MoveOn members can post their thoughts regarding important political issues.
Once in a while—as in any public forum—inappropriate material is posted. Recently, a few of the thousands of comments that are posted every week contained anti-Semitic language.
The comments that were posted were abhorrent. We were dismayed to see them, and removed them as soon as they came to our attention 17 days ago.
Many of the comments identified were not, in fact, made by MoveOn members. We are working to discern whether they were made as a part of a right-wing campaign to target the organization.
Clearly, any attempt to tie MoveOn’s 3.2 million members to the hateful comments of a few nonmembers on an online public forum is wrong.
We were pleased to see that so many MoveOn members rose to sharply criticize the hate speech that was posted – even before it was brought to our attention.”

Let's take a look at this in detail. We will begin by posting but a few examples of the material under discussion. "4 of 4 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE" means that four out of the four MoveOn.org Action Forum participants who voted on the statement agreed with it, and none found it repugnant, bigoted, or hateful.

We would have more women candidates, more black, hispanic, asian descent, native-american, middle eastern descent that truly represent our society. Not fat, white, rich Christians who represent themselves and their fat rich friends.
4 of 4 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE

The American Jewish Committee obviously has money to spend. Their ad against Iran in yesterday's New York Times shows that the Committee is American only in name and should change its name to the Israeli Jewish Committee. If Iran is a threat to the region, what about Israel? How many countries can Israel destroy with its 200 plus nuclear warheads and all its planes, tanks and submarines?
If they think Israel is threatened, there is an honorable way to help: make aliah (emigrate to Israel). I am sure they will be welcome.
9 of 10 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE

I respect everybody's opinion but obviously some people hate Jews. I am sure they have their reasons but they should not let whatever bad experience they had with some Jews (and I am sure they had some) interfere with their judgment.
9 of 10 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE

There are several million people (Randi Rhodes says 20 to 25 million) who it seems progressives simply can't convince of their stupidity. They are the Born Again Christians or Evangelical Christians. I, like Randi, have given up on them because they simply hate science, and I can't deal with people like that. We need someone - not me - to see if something can't be done about that. Those people are "shooting themselves in the foot" because they are poor and letting the rich control them, but are too dumb to know it. The Evangelicals are a small part of Christians. Why can't mainstream Christians do something about them?
70 percent voted to agree that "something" should be done about science-hating Evangelical Christians

We can all see how AIPAC/Israel has taken control of America. Not to get nasty but jews have a long history of subverting governments for their own enrichment and glory to the detriment of whole societies. Many more than "6 million" have died by semetic aggression, 100's of millions even, remember the conqueror writes history. Even the roman empire feared jewish power. Over and over again, whites, particularly semites have distorted truth through their supremacist, zenophobic minds. Ariel Sharon Oct of 2001 per Kol Israel, "... Don't worry about america, we control america and the americans know it." There is a mental pathology gripping my tribe, as the native americans say, "white man have forked tongue", we must become enlightened, or we will be destroyed.
13 of 16 voted to AGREE with this

But until the priests are hounded down and arrested like the baby rapers they are, the neverending cycle will continue. You want to throw a monkey wrench in both political parties? Call for the arrest and immediate incarceration of the Catholic Pedophiles of America.
8 out of 9 voted to AGREE with this

Now let's take a look at Eli Pariser's statements about this hate speech.

MoveOn’s ActionForum is an open forum where members of the public and MoveOn members can post their thoughts regarding important political issues.
Once in a while—as in any public forum—inappropriate material is posted. Recently, a few of the thousands of comments that are posted every week contained anti-Semitic language.

You just found out about it "recently," Mr. Pariser?

From: Jan Mel Poller [E-mail given to MoveOn.org, deleted for privacy here]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 10:19 AM
To: ‘info@moveon.org’
Subject: Liberals and the left

I doubt that you will read this or pass it on to your leaders, but it is worth a try.

I am an old time Liberal, dating back to the Truman era. I am deeply disturbed by some of the anti-liberal views espoused in many forums on line, in college campuses and in the news media.

Liberalism always fought for truth and against censorship. I was told by a Muslim woman that she was against terrorism, Saddam, Arafat and the rest of the Jihad leaders. However, her posts were not allowed to appear here. At the same time, Nouris strongly anti-Israel posts, not to mention rod Hutchinson’s anti-Semitic post are allowed to appear.

You tolerated [censored?] my posts, which challenged support for Jihadist terrorism and supported Israel and the spread of democracy throughout the world (including the Arab world), have all been removed. I am no longer allowed to post...

Jan Mel Poller

PS: you might remind Noah T Winer that Hamas wants to slaughter all Jews in Israel. If they succeed in doing that, they won’t stop there. After all, the Islamo-Fascists are claiming Spain again and the Jews would be killed there, as well.

Right. Eli Pariser says the hate speech came to MoveOn's attention only "recently" (August 2006 time frame), but the above E-mail proves that MoveOn.org was not only informed of the hate speech more than two years previously, it was exercising editorial control in its favor. Not only is Eli Pariser a proven liar, he is an incompetant liar, noting that his own Web site supports the assertion that MoveOn.org was fully aware of the hate speech at all times, and chose to exercise editorial control in its favor.

http://www.actionforum.com/general/faq.html#1
How can I make sure someone at MoveOn reads my post ? All comments are read at least twice. While there is no single criteria, comments that suggest a possible MoveOn action and are not duplicative are likely to be immediately passed on, or included in a summary to the whole MoveOn team. Ratings, while important, are not definitive and some comments with few or low ratings are included in the summaries. Important issues are sometimes followed up with a survey to a sampling of the membership.

Just what does your moderator do? Our moderators are better described as monitors. They spend the vast majority of their time looking for comments to pass on to the MoveOn team and doing weekly forum summaries. With regard to moderating, their goal is to help create a space to facilitate input. It is not their goal to remove every comment that might be inappropriate. [Our experience is, however, that they were very diligent at removing comments that criticized MoveOn.org.] The first line of moderators are our members, who rate inappropriate comments low.

We reiterate that MoveOn's members rated the anti-Semitic and anti-Christian hate speech very highly, along with 9/11 conspiracy theories that could have come straight from the Jeff Rense Show. In any event, Eli Pariser's press release continues,

The comments that were posted were abhorrent. We were dismayed to see them, and removed them as soon as they came to our attention 17 days ago.

Again, Eli Pariser is not only a liar, but an incompetant liar. We have already proven that the hate speech came to MoveOn's attention not 17 days ago (counting from September 2 2006) but more than two years previously. Not only that, our MoveOn.org hate speech collection at this site and this one (we needed two Web pages to hold all of it) was harvested well after September 2. (If the hate speech was recovered from Google's cache as opposed to online Action Forum pages, it says so. This is where we found most of the anti-Catholic hate speech.) Even a schoolchild knows that, if he's going to tell the teacher or a classmate a lie, it's a good idea to clean up the evidence first, but Eli Pariser apparently failed to learn this simple concept in grade school.

We were pleased to see that so many MoveOn members rose to sharply criticize the hate speech that was posted – even before it was brought to our attention.

Is this what Eli Parasite means by "rose to sharply criticize the hate speech?"

Another neo-con appeared today on C-Span to defend Bush and his spying program! I am Jewish and proud of it (despite everything) but I am sick of seeing those neo-cons posing as average joes on national television to defend Bush and his lies. Since they don't have the decency or honesty to identify themselves by saying: "But you know, I am a Zionist and may be biased" and since most Americans can't tell the difference and don't have the courage to ask, maybe they should be forced to wear an Israeli flag on the lapel of their jackets. Isn't it time to tell the American people the truth, i.e. that Jews control all the media.
8 of 8 AGREE that the Jews control all the media

Thanks Harry, for telling it like it is. Rice and Powell ARE "house slaves". And the "Republicans ARE like the Jews who worked for Hitler". And Shrub IS "a tyrant and a terrorist". Harry, we need people like you in Congress.
12 of 15 voted to AGREE with this

The Jews have 9,000 prisoners the Arabs have 3.
It’s the Jews that are trying to push the Arabs into the sea by occupying and annexing their land, bulldozing refugee camps and orchards.
The Jews are killing the Arabs on a ratio of 10 to 1.
The Palestinians live in a prison, no way in or out without passing through an abusive Jewish guard gate.
The Jews demand that the Pals. disarm prior to any negotiating of what if anything they’ll get back. That is called begging not negotiating.
Nearly 3/4 of the entire Jewish population was exterminated. If you can’t tell us why, We are stuck with logic and commonsense.
I’m saying Jews instead of Israelis because I read the Israeli newspapers, the “Israeli Lobby” papers and have seen the House vote 410-8 in support Israel while the UN typically votes 191-4 against Israel. Also the billions in aid and military equipment are conspicuous. The world court unanimously voted against Israel.
By blaming Hitler you don’t have to face the truth.
I will stop condemning Jews when they become acclimated with all people.
Stop professing to know and start reading.
9 of 12 voted to AGREE that Jews did "something" to deserve the Holocaust

Furthermore, MoveOn.org itself published this derogatory photomanipulation of Pope Benedict in 2005. We encourage our readers to copy and circulate it so Catholic Democratic voters (especially in New York and Pennsylvania) can see exactly what Eli Pariser and his friends think of them.

Now let's take a look at yet another example of Eli Pariser's personal character. This is not from Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, or Rush Limbaugh. It's from Eli Pariser's own Web site.

The MoveOn Peace campaign was founded independently by Eli Pariser, a Maine native and recent graduate of Simon's Rock College of Bard. In the days following September 11th, 2001, he launched an online petition calling for a restrained and multi-lateral response to the attacks, which was quickly signed by more than half a million people. Eli joined forces with MoveOn soon afterward, and is now MoveOn.org Political Action’s Executive Director.

Right. While General David Petraeus and hundreds of thousands of men and women of character like him were willing to put their lives on the line to deal with the perpetrators of the worst atrocity that has ever been committed against our nation, this two-bit punk circulated a petition to sing "Kumbaya" with them. Eli Pariser is not, however, the only two-bit liar to defame General Petraeus. Hillary Clinton said,

I think the reports that you provide to us really require the willing suspension of disbelief.

It is well known that anything a Clinton says requires not merely the willing suspension of disbelief, but the consumption of mind-altering drugs, to take it seriously. "I did not have sex with that woman" is but one example. The following picture, however, says more about Hillary Clinton's personal ethics, character, and integrity than any number of words could possibly do:

Senator Hillary Clinton (NY): “I have enjoyed a long and positive relationship with Reverend Al Sharpton and National Action Network, and I don’t ever remember saying “no” to them and I intend to remain their partner in civil rights as I clean the dirt from under the carpet in the oval office when I am elected President.”

This is the same individual who played a major role in the Crown Heights riots and the arson of Freddy's Fashion Mart, as well as a leading role in the Tawana Brawley scandal. Al Sharpton is best described as what one would get by combining the Ku Klux Klan's David Duke and disbarred prosecutor Mike Nifong, and then adding some dark pigment. Sharpton is the African-American equivalent of David Duke and Mike Nifong put together: a self-serving liar who makes false rape accusations while fomenting racist and anti-Semitic hatred. This is the individual with whom Hillary Clinton enjoys a "long and positive relationship," and who never says "no" to Sharpton's hate organization.

Noting that Laura Bush probably found the concept of turning those carpets over so sickening that she let them be, we can tell Hillary Clinton what she will find if she ever gets anywhere near the Oval Office. She could easily find a few stray pieces of cash that her husband's campaign received from Mainland Chinese donors, in exchange for missile technology that can be used to attack the United States. She is also likely to find her husband's used condoms (none used on her, of course) and porn magazines.

The bottom line is, however, that MoveOn.org's defamation of General Petraeus, and the failure of all but a few Democrats (Joe Lieberman and, surprisingly, John Kerry) to denounce it speaks for the character of the entire National Democratic Party. It's important to add, however, that MoveOn.org has nothing to do with Democrats at the state or local level of government. Most Pennsylvania Democrats (many of whom are Irish, Polish, or Italian Catholics) would be outraged and appalled by MoveOn's promotion of anti-Catholic hate speech, and Democratic veterans and service members doubtlessly find MoveOn's ad every bit as repugnant as we do.

Response to MoveOn.org "General Betray Us" ad

2007-09-13T13:48:00.001-04:00

We add that the only reason we didn’t depict MoveOn.org as feces-throwing monkeys is that Poser 6 doesn’t have a monkey figure. As for clever schoolyard names, Eli Parasite (Eli Pariser) and Noah Whiner (Noah Winer) come to mind. Noah Winer is the editor of MoveOn.org’s official bulletins, which included content from the Electronic Intifada and similar entities, and arguably anti-Semitic content about “neoconservatives” with divided loyalties.

NJDC Smears Christian Computer Game

2007-08-26T17:23:00.000-04:00

The National Jewish Democratic Council (double oxymoron, there is very little either Jewish or Democratic about it) is already well known for publishing anti-Christian hate propaganda in the form of its "Bubbie versus the GOP" video series. While these animations do portray Republicans as robots, monsters, and shadowy cabal members, they also depict Christians, Jesus, and Christian symbols in a "This is the Enemy" context. Yesterday, the National Jewish Democratic Council's blog featured a blantant and outright lie about the computer game "Left Behind: Eternal Forces."

While we do not share the literal theology behind this game, our Christian friends can be assured that the NJDC does not speak for any reputable American Jews in its efforts to smear the game, or indeed in many other matters. NJDC has also published anti-Semitic "Jew as Christian hater" propaganda in its desperate efforts to divide Jews and Christians, while whitewashing anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic, and other hate speech by fellow left-wing Democrats at MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum.

Pentagon Came Close to Distributing "Convert or Kill" Video Game Promoting Murder of Non-Christians to American Troops by Rebecca Murow says,

Believe it or not, the Pentagon came close last week to sending out a video game that rewards gamers "for how effectively they role play the killing of those who resist becoming a born again Christian."

You know the one, last winter's "Left Behind: Eternal Forces." The one that endorses a theology that believes Jews and other non-Christians must convert or be killed. The one in which the "good guys" are a Christian coalition fighting against the "bad guys" (a UN-like peace-keeping group). The game condemned by the ADL, the Christian Alliance for Progress, and others. The one you would probably not want your children to play.

We will start by saying that we have no problem whatsoever with the game portraying the United Nations ("Global Community") as villains, and even as "shoot" targets. The United Nations has a long track record of complicity with despotic regimes while condemning every move Israel takes to defend itself, forcing teenage and pre-teen girls to give sex in exchange for badly-needed food (Google on "United Nations" and "sex for food," we lock people like that up in this country), and seating so-called countries like Syria and Libya on human rights commissions. We would not object had the game's designers have given the Antichrist's army blue helmets with the UN logo, along with food to offer to unsuspecting children in post-Rapture New York.

The National "Jewish" "Democratic" Council has never let facts or truth get in its way, and this posting is no exception. We looked up "Left Behind: Eternal Forces," and here is what we found.

# There is NO killing in the name of God, and NO convert or die missions
# All content has been reviewed and approved by Tyndale House Publishers prior to publication
# Conduct warfare using PRAYER and WORSHIP – these are more powerful weapons than guns
# Recover ancient scriptures

The San Francisco Chronicle adds, despite the article title Convert or die' game divides Christians

Left Behind Games' president, Jeffrey Frichner, says the game actually is pacifist because players lose "spirit points" every time they gun down nonbelievers rather than convert them. They can earn spirit points again by having their character pray.

"You are fighting a defensive battle in the game," Frichner, whose previous company produced Bible software, said of combatting the Antichrist. "You are a sort of a freedom fighter."

Presumably, the need to "gun down nonbelievers" might result from being cornered by the Antichrist's Secret Police, Gestapo, pedophilic United Nations Peacekeepers (Google on "sex for food scandal"), or whatever. Since the player incurs a penalty even for killing them in self-defense, there is an incentive to avoid such confrontations--which differs considerably from promoting a "convert or die" mentality in which the player "guns down" nonbelievers. That sort of conduct is left to the forces of Antichrist Nicolae Carpathia and, in the real world, to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's followers and other militant "Muslims."

We do not believe literally in the Book of Revelation, but the model it presents--a dictator who, with the aid of a False Prophet, creates omens to manipulate his followers--is entirely valid. At the time of its writing, Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar had already used this tactic, and it probably dates back to the time when the first war leader told his shaman, High Priest, or whomever how he wanted the chicken entrails interpreted. The disciple John did not need a literal revelation from God to predict how future dictators might use the same procedure, and a good number have done so. The Mahdi who destroyed Khartoum and killed General Gordon, for example, claimed to converse regularly with God and/or Mohammed. We need look no farther today than Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, whose inner circle accomodates him by claiming to see a green light or aura around him when he speaks. Ahmadinejad also claims to be in contact with the Twelfth Imam (False Prophet), who will doubtlessly appear when the time is "right." We do not believe that Christians will be saved from him in the Rapture, but he is already using phony omens to manipulate credulous followers. He is also quite capable of killing all Jews, Christians, and even Muslims who will not worship his perverted vision of Allah--which means, in practice, Ahmadinejad himself.

The game's FAQ page adds,

Why does this game have to contain violence at all? Why is it necessary for a fun and successful game?
Violence is not required to make a fun game. However, it is required to make a game about the end of the world in the Left Behind book series. We have taken great care to make certain that there are real consequences for poor gamer behavior, unlike most games in the market. For instance, unnecessary killing will result in lower Spirit points which are essential to winning.

Even the Anti-Defamation League, which NJDC cited as a reference in its attack on the game, says,

The game is designed to make force an option only used by players if necessary when their forces are attacked by those hunting them, and any characters that kill others in the game are penalized. Conversion to Christianity in the game is not depicted as forcible in nature, and violence is not rewarded in the game.

The game revolves around "spirit" - a low spirit leads a character to the side of the Antichrist, and players must continually watch their spirit levels to ensure they do not slide towards evil. Killing others in the game deeply affects the spirit levels, and players must have those characters pray to build themselves back up or risk turning evil.

When a character is praying, he apparently cannot do anything else, while the bad guys are still free to move and operate. This is probably similar to strategy games in which armies must withdraw from combat, or ships return to port, for reinforcements or repair. This is the only game of which we know in which the player suffers damage for killing genuine villains, although many arcade games penalize first person shooters for hitting hostages or innocent bystanders. (Further investigation shows that the bad guys have the ability to "swear," perhaps to prevent the good guys from winning them over.)

The left's lies about "Left Behind: Eternal Forces" reinforces this:

the only characters in the game who have the ability to kill are the soldiers and the game manual details at length (far more than any other characters) their role in the game. Here are a few of the important points the game manual makes about soldiers:

*Soldiers have made themselves available to defend your forces from bodily harm and death.

*They are performing their roles as physical defenders, but their #1 goal is still to save as many people from the antichrist as possible.

*With each life he ends, his Spirit level will immediately drop substantially.

*Killing a neutral should be avoided at all costs - and the spiritual penalty for doing so is especially harsh.

*Your duty and moral obligation is to use soldiers as little as humanly possible.

... *Your soldiers - even in aggressive mode - will still ignore noncombatants.

A review of the game by someone who has actually played it says,

Many groups have made inaccurate statements about this game that need to be corrected. For one thing, it is not particularly violent. While there are violent aspects of the game, the game makes it clear that shooting is the last resort. Second, it is not hateful to other religions. It does have an agenda, and I think you need to know that going in, but there's no bashing of other faiths.

We are not going to argue with the "agenda" comment, because the game's purpose is obviously to promote the Christian religion and Christian beliefs about the End Times. Furthermore, we do question the Pentagon's judgment in thinking of distributing this game to members of the Armed Forces. Non-Christian service members could indeed construe it as promotion of a religion by the government. We therefore cannot disagree entirely with the NJDC's blog entry but, had NJDC stuck to the facts instead of making up sensationalistic lies about a "Convert or Kill" computer game, it could have made a much stronger argument. We encourage NJDC to consider the Latin proverb, falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus (false in one thing, false in all things). Once your reader catches you in a blatant lie, he or she is not going to be very interested in anything else you say, even if it is true.

Daily Kos: "Raise Money like a Jew"

2007-08-14T15:12:00.000-04:00

We saw the following on the front page of the Daily Kos:

Elegy For A Fallen Candidate
by Trapper John
Mon Aug 13, 2007 at 03:13:05 PM PDT

O Tommy boy/
the polls, the polls are falling/
from Council Bluffs, and down to Waterloo/
the summer's gone, and your numbers are dying/
because you failed/
to raise money like a Jew/
And don't come back, your time has come and gone, son/
You're just a hack, who can't hold in his pee/
But you were good for laughs, at least, dear cheesehead/
O Tommy Boy, O Tommy Boy/
we'll miss you . . . see? So? I'm sorry, what was that last word? My hearing aid isn't working . .

Upon following the indicated link, and searching for the word "Jew" at http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#117674748460610844, we found the explanation close to the bottom of the page.

WASHINGTON - Former Wisconsin governor and Republican presidential hopeful Tommy Thompson told Jewish activists Monday that making money is "part of the Jewish tradition," and something that he applauded.

Speaking to an audience at the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism in Washington D.C., Thompson said that, "I'm in the private sector and for the first time in my life I'm earning money. You know that's sort of part of the Jewish tradition and I do not find anything wrong with that."

Thompson later apologized for the comments that had caused a stir in the audience, saying that he had meant it as a compliment, and had only wanted to highlight the "accomplishments" of the Jewish religion.

In other words, Trapper John's "Elegy for a Fallen Candidate" was apparently a criticism of Tommy Thompson's statement above. (We do not find it particularly offensive, noting that Thompson's intention was obviously to compare the Jewish tradition to the Protestant work ethic, both of which involve "earning money.")

The fact that we had to do such an intensive search for what Trapper John apparently meant to say does not, however, speak very well for his own judgment. At least Thompson's words can be understood from their direct context ("earning money"), and one does not have to go to another Web page and search it to understand what he was trying to say. We doubt that most readers would cut a blogger much slack if he used the N word, even if he provided a link that would show (after considerable effort by a reader who didn't know how to use his browser's search function) that he wasn't trying to deride Black people.

If the Daily Kos is upset with Bill O'Reilly accusing it of sponsoring hate speech, it should look in the mirror for the chief problem.

MoveOn.org donor smears Fred Thompson with fake site

2007-08-09T17:11:00.001-04:00

http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/011065.php

Progressives For Racist Smears? (Update: Progressive Wises Up A Little Late)

It doesn't take long for provocateurs to crawl out of the woodwork to attack candidates, especially in stealth attacks. With Fred Thompson, they've apparently started before he officially enters the race -- and in one case, race is the operative word. Apparently hoping to confuse web surfers looking for Fred's website at www.imwithfred.com, a new site has appeared at www.imwithfred2008.com -- only this site welcomes people to the Ku Klux Klan, "Bringing a Message of Hope and Deliverance to White Christian America!" It includes links to a variety of disgusting racist sites.

Who would post something like this as a smear on Fred Thompson? Someone a little too stupid to cover his tracks, possibly? A DNS search gives us an answer. The domain name, registered through GoDaddy (no great shock there), belongs to:

Henry Reynolds
500 California Ave. #5
Santa Monica, California 90403
United States

The phone number listed on the domain record, which I won't post here, goes to an answering machine for the "law offices of Henry Reynolds". I left a message asking for comment on this website, and then decided to take a look through OpenSecrets and the FEC to see if Mr. Reynolds has a history of supporting Fred Thompson, or even the KKK. Actually, it turns out that a Mr. Henry Reynolds in the same zip code working as an attorney has a small record of political donations -- but in another direction:

# 4/6/2005 - $500, MoveOn.org

This is entirely in keeping with the standard operating procedures of the anti-Semitic and anti-Catholic hate group known as MoveOn.org.

Daily Kos, like MoveOn.org, Promotes Hate Speech

2007-07-27T02:52:00.000-04:00

We have reported extensively on how MoveOn.org promoted and welcomed anti-Semitic and anti-Catholic hate speech, along with 9/11 denial, on its disgraced Action Forum. Bill O'Reilly has recently described how the left-wing Daily Kos encourages similar material. Here are things you can do to expose MoveOn.org for what it is.

(1)

O'Reilly defends comparison of Daily Kos to Nazis and KKK says,

From the July 16 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

O'REILLY: Hi, I'm Bill O'Reilly. Thank you for watching us tonight. JetBlue and the radical left -- that is the subject of this evening's "Talking Points Memo."

What do you think of someone who says the following: "The world would be better off without him." That after Tony Snow announced his cancer had returned. "The pope is a primate." "Evangelicals are nut cases." "Better luck next time," after an assassination plot against Vice President Cheney in Afghanistan. And "Some attacks against coalition forces in Iraq are legitimate."

All of those thoughts were posted on a vicious far-left website called the Daily Kos, one of the worst examples of hatred America has to offer. This summer, that website is having a convention in Chicago. And only one major corporation has stepped up as a sponsor. That company is JetBlue, the airline that melted down last winter.

The Daily Kos' defenders tried the same argument that MoveOn.org did last year, and O'Reilly answered it:

BRADY: You know, there's no question Daily Kos is clearly on the left. And one thing that comes up, especially with these open forums is you get a lot of lunatics come up. And I'm sure -- I look at this site.

O'REILLY: You know, you - look, I have my own website. We don't -- open forum is bull. All right? You can regulate what's on your website. Now, this kind of a thing has got to be troubling to, I think, millions of Americans when they hear it. Because this is the only, as we pointed out, sponsor. The only one. Everybody else stays way away from this.

We have proven that MoveOn.org was exercising editorial control over its "open forum," which makes it responsible for the content. Perhaps we should sign up at the Daily Kos and post things about Barack Obama's and Hillary Clinton's association with the prominent racist and anti-Semite Al Sharpton, and see how long our posts remain online.

Meanwhile, investigation of the Daily Kos reveals exactly the kind of material that appeared at MoveOn.org's Action Forum.

Who will oppose Israel? (0 / 0)

America's blind support to Israel is the result of the Jewish lobby. The neo-cons and other groups that seek to subvert America have always had an opposition force against them. The Jewish lobby owns Republicans and Democrats and stands unopposed. The result is silence against Israel’s crimes against humanity and the undermining of American interests and moral authority. Many have stood up against Bush but what politician or commentator has the fearlessness and moral character to stand up against Israeli policies? The silence can end on this blog. I would encourage others to regularly post comments that reject Israeli atrocities against humanity.

--CA-11: Richard Pombo enriched by Jack Abramoff

by ImpeachBushCheney on Fri Jun 30, 2006 at 10:52:40 AM PDT

Euston Meat Beat Manifesto

Were Jewish interests "behind" the Iraq War? Alone, hell no. But were they a factor? That's not even up for debate. Of course they were. Have you been able to argue with a rightwinger who didn't point to Saddam Hussein rewarding the families of suicide bombers as supporting terrorism (then equivocating it with the US/Al Queda conflict)?

...Trying to suggest that there is zero influence from the rightwing neocon segment of the Jewish lobby in Bush's administration is just blithering stupidity. "No basis in fact or logic" is a claim you're simply unable to substantiate. Criticizing Israeli policy and US policy regarding Israel is all I've done and you won't be able to produce a shred of evidence otherwise. What you also have to overlook is that I also think the Palestinians have been a bunch of incompetent dishonest scoundrels.

But this is what serves for debate...yell "anti-Semite" first and rest on your little perch. The fact that you can't tell the difference between somebody like me and David Duke is exactly what fuels the rise of anti-Semitism abroad. If you call everybody who even slightly disagrees on Israel or says "Jewish" instead of "Israeli" an anti-Semite, the charge loses effectiveness. You're the one responsible for watering it down. You just end up pissing off people like me who are trying to rationally find an end to this inane and pointless struggle, and you feed the real anti-Semites even more fuel.

You're a goddamn worm, whatever the hell you are.

www.iowaliberal.com

by nitrate21 on Wed Apr 19, 2006 at 07:25:31 PM PDT

A comment for A Ride with Heinrich Himmler cites what are apparently four examples of anti-Semitic hate speech at the Daily Kos

Here's the first four I found. (0 / 0)

According to the study, pro-Israel lobby groups have exploited the sensitivities of major media outlets and of US politicians to campaign contributions to maintain their sympathy for Israel regardless of what it does in the region.

By AIPAC's last count, 11 US senators were Jewish and only 2-3 % of the population is Jewish. I am sure there are similar ratios in the House of Representatives

Because each and every congressman is fearful of AIPAC. So they all toe the line, and the exceptions to this rule get hammered ruthlessly by America's most powerful lobby.

The irony is that this is the first time in history that a tiny nation (Israel) has manuevered a superpower to fight a war as its proxy. It's usually the other way around. And of course the oil was going to pay for it all. Just ask Mr Wolfowitz about that. Alas, in America it is not politically correct (or if your running for office, politically wise)to question the dangerous influence that Israel has over the foreign policy and national security of the United States

Palestine: Nobel peace laureate Corrigan injured in anti-fence protest quotes the following:

According to the opposing view, the United States’ support for Israel does not advance American aims, it jeopardizes them. The explanation for the support is to be found in the activities of the Israel Lobby, also known as the Jewish Lobby, or as AIPAC (the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee), which uses its formidable influence to shape American foreign policy in accordance with Israeli interests. The opinion as most recently been associated with an article published in the London Book Review, co-authored by Professor Merscheimer of the University of Chicago and Professor Walt of Harvard University.
http://www.palestinechronicle.com/...

Why Lieberman's Independent Run Will Fail talks about "Jew Lieberman," to use MoveOn.org's terminology.

Reason # 1 (0 / 0)

The Repubs will get behind Joe and probably try to rig the elections. Joe voted quite a lot with the repub on issues of war. They will support him and finance him under the table. I pray he quits first but even if he does he will probably work for the Jewish Lobby.

"Though the Mills of the Gods grind slowly,Yet they grind exceeding small."

by Owllwoman on Thu Aug 10, 2006 at 04:55:44 AM PDT

As with MoveOn.org, the Daily Kos community does not confine its hate speech to Jews. The phrase "Pope Nazi" also appeared in MoveOn.org's Action Forum.

Is Ratzinger still a Nazi ?

by hillarious
Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 02:32:11 PM PDT
There's heated debate about whether it's appropriate to call Ratzinger the Nazi Pope. It is not clear he's still influenced by the Nazi teaching during his childhood, however, it is clear he was in the Nazi Youth Camp and he is notoriously ultraconversative.

I'm pretty tired of hearing people say we should not question his past, and he was just a child etc. Yes, he was a child, but we're talking about the spiritual leader of Catholics. What is wrong to hold him to high standard? Why can't they choose another cardinal with better image? If he didn't have the courage to resist joining Nazi Youth Camp, probably we should not expect him to be the leader as well.

I will call him Nazi Pope, plain and simple, for his past, more importantly, for his current facist doctrine.

Call Ratzinger Nazi Pope

by hillarious
Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 10:18:18 AM PDT
I hate the liberals whining when they do not know how to fight. I don't care whether this guy is a real Nazi or not. He's an ultraconservative and we need to demonize him as soon as possible.

The fact is he was in the Nazi Youth Camp when he was 14.

In his memoirs, Ratzinger wrote that he was enrolled in the Nazi youth movement against his will when he was 14 in 1941, when membership was compulsory. He said he was soon let out because of his studies for the priesthood.

Two years later he was drafted into a Nazi anti-aircraft unit as a helper, a common taks for teenage boys too young to be soldiers. A year later he was released, only to be sent to the Austrian-Hungarian border to construct tank barriers.

Somebody has to dig out more dirt of this guy.

This Daily Kos-er admits that Ratzinger was forced to enroll in the Nazi youth movement, and was drafted into an anti-aircraft unit. Now tell us, who forced the Daily Kos and MoveOn.org to publish and promote anti-Semitic material that could have come directly from Hitler and Goebbels?

Pimps, Pedophiles, Priests, and Fox News

Oh, I'm a religious bigot alright. (8+ / 0-)

Recommended by:
Brian Bell, Woody, lucysdad, DEFuning, Sassy, jfadden, mango, sarasson007

I make no secret of that. I despise religion, all of it, even that part that does good, because it's all based on lies. Like the war in Iraq, no good will ever come out of it, because it started with a lie.
I concede 'most' priests were probably not pedophiles.
They didn't molest children physically, only developmentally, teaching them to remain forever infantile emotionally, with this idea that if they are only 'good boys' or 'good girls', a magical 'father' will break the physical laws of the universe on their behalf.
Molesting them emotionally, by teaching them that the most joyful aspects of their physical nature are dirty, sinful;
Abusing them intellectually, by teaching them there is an all-powerful authority they must never question. I could go on and on.
The church, in particular the Catholic church, is an evil organization, that has nothing much in common to do with the man they claim they follow. The whole thing is based on lies, beginning with the fact that it was founded by Jesus- not so.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. Aesop (620 - 560 BC) -8.13, -7.74

by AWhitneyBrown on Sat Jun 03, 2006 at 03:11:56 PM PDT

...I don't think my opinion on this particular topic (3+ / 0-)

Recommended by:
Brian Bell, mango, sarasson007

is going to have any influence on whether religious people decide to support Democrats or Republicans. Or even whether they decide to post here. I don't really subscribe to the theory that individuals posting here represent anyone other than themselves.
Just to prove it, let me point out something else:
I DON'T SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!
I don't think 99 percent of our soldiers are decent, law-abiding folks of good will. On the contrary, I think most of them are a bunch of murdering, racist, bullies. Who sincerely believe 'they' attacked us on 9/11, because 'they' means Moslems, all Moslems, and Sihks and Persians to boot.
So, I don't support our troops, and I hate religion. You think those two opinions of mine are going to stop anyone from voting Democratic?
You think there are people who might read this thread or some other where I post my opinion and say to themselves;
"You know, I was thinking of becoming more progressive, but that asshole A. Whitney Brown hates our troops and Christians, so the hell with it, I think I'll remain a Republican."
That would be too bad. But it's too late to change.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. Aesop (620 - 560 BC) -8.13, -7.74

by AWhitneyBrown on Sat Jun 03, 2006 at 03:46:39 PM PDT

...Oh, one more thing. (0 / 0)

Look Arken, you confuse me with someone who gives a **** how Catholics these pope worshipping, blood drinking, superstitious hoopleheads. If they want ot live under Republican rule the rest of their lives, there's nothing I can do or say. I'm certainly not interested in wasting any of my time on this earth convincing them otherwise. Nor in censoring my own opinions in the hope of not offending them. Anyone who is offended by my opinions is welcome to turn the page.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. Aesop (620 - 560 BC) -8.13, -7.74

by AWhitneyBrown on Sat Jun 03, 2006 at 06:59:31 PM PDT

...I never said anything about individual Catholics. (0 / 0)

Being Catholic is adhering to a set of beliefs, just like being a Republican. No one is born Catholic, that's why they have confirmations.
Adults can choose their own belief systems and at some point they must take responsibility for their choices. The Catholic church is a force for evil in the world, no different than the KKK, the Republican Party, or the Westboro Baptist Church.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. Aesop (620 - 560 BC) -8.13, -7.74

by AWhitneyBrown on Sat Jun 03, 2006 at 06:44:39 PM PDT

The Daily Kos includes at least one supporter of the prominent racist and anti-Semite Al Sharpton:

Al Sharpton Decides To Be A Piece Of ****
by Richard Platypus
Wed Mar 14, 2007 at 03:28:30 AM PDT

Ok. Let it be known that this diary is coming from the perspective of an Al Sharpton supporter. I'm a New York activist, so I've marched with the guy many times. And I like him; I think that New York City is a better place for the fact that any time a politician thinks about defying humanity to score a centrist political point, he needs to worry about Al Sharpton to keep him in check with scores of protesters (and I've been among those "scores", standing out in the cold with picket signs, a number of times).
So my question: What the **** is this ****, Sharpton picking a fight with Barack Obama?

We actually agree with "Richard Platypus" that Al Sharpton is a sack of fertilizer, not for allegedly picking a fight with Obama but because racist and anti-Semitic filth stinks to high heaven whether it comes from Sharpton or the Klan, but it's interesting to note that he "marched with the guy many times." We wonder whether he yelled "Kill the Jews" in Crown Heights or called the owner of Freddy's Fashion Mart a "cracker" or a "bloodsucking Jew," like the rest of Sharpton's entourage.

Here is how you can help destroy MoveOn.org as a viable political entity before next year's elections. We see MoveOn as a higher priority than the Daily Kos, because of its widespread fundraising and mobilization capabilities. Nonetheless, plenty can and should be said about the Daily Kos as well, and we are quite capable of compiling a collection similar to the one we have on MoveOn.org.

(1) this page to show her what you are talking about.

(2) Write to Bill O'Reilly at oreilly "at" foxnews.com. If he thinks what the Daily Kos did is bad, wait until he sees what MoveOn.org says about Jews, Catholics, and even African-Americans.

MoveOn.org: "Israel, Our Child Of Terror"

2007-07-18T12:49:00.000-04:00

From MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum, still "on vacation to conserve technology bandwidth" for the 2006 elections.

America is the Dr. Frankenstein and in our labs we have created with our genius
the monster Frankenstein.
We pay for those weapons. We personally pay taxes that murder people and our hands drip with blood of the Iraqi and Palestinian children and men and women.
The "special relationship' we have with Israel is part of our EXCEPTIONALISM. We believe we deserve to own the world's resources, and the land and oil and water and power is ours.
We pay for the largest military in the world so we can continue to feed our monster's habit of blood-sucking.
Why is Israel feed American tax dollars? Because it is our baby.
We are locked into a Neocon dream of world dominance. Israel took the part of NAZI Germany that understands world dominance through military and of course, the idea of death camps.
The oppressed has become the oppressor in some sadomasochist dream of power.
And then we watch the nuclear game, where we know Israel has enough nukes to end life on earth and we attack the Muslim states who start to think of getting their own in five or ten years.
We as Dr. Frankenstein love our handywork.
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html
And like a dysfunctional family with a sick father who murders women at night, our little monster child is something we are sickly proud of, for the monster will outdo us in his reach for little girls.
And when the world of Muslims and free farmers come out in pitchforks and torches, we act sooooooooooooooo surprised that they would hurt our monster child.
We weep for Israel, our Frankenstein baby monster. I personally think this monster helped the NeoCon dream of world domination by the New Pearl Harbor of 9-11, but then I am suspicious since I have seen the damage
my tax dollars and your tax dollars of millions every day has done to the
Palestinians.
Maybe they learned it all from daddy America when we stole the
land from the Natives and slaughtered wholesale their children and women?

18 out of 25 agree

MoveOn.org Action Forum says, "Police Officers are Racists"

2007-07-13T10:50:00.000-04:00

Posting seen on MoveOn.org's disgraced, anti-Catholic, and anti-Semitic Action Forum

The Jews don’t deserve a State, and are less deserving than African Americans. The Jews are receiving African Americans’ “REPRARATION” in the form of foreign aid. …

At least Israel requires that their youth serve in the military. This administration and its COWARDS find all the loop holes in order that they and their Caucasians Love Ones do not have to serve. When the Reserves and National Guard were considered safe havens, these units were ‘reserved’ for Caucasians. African Americans were delegated to Cooks, Mechanics etc., with little chance of advancement. Now we send our Reserves and National Guard to Muslim countries with the pretense that we want to create freedom for Muslims. These units consist of Police Officers and other Racist individuals who have since the founding of America, have discriminated and violated the rights of minorities in this country. See: http://unitedaffirmativeactiondevelopment.com/id12.html

In my opinion it is OK
more…

Scores (10) 70% AGREE

MoveOn.org Action Forum says, Blacks should not serve in our Armed Forces

2007-07-12T12:04:00.000-04:00

I, whose son served in Afghanistan and Iraq, wish Cindy [Sheehan?] could tell Bush what I have written and wish I could tell him face to face. I believe him to be an unethical liar who never should had been put in the position he is so unqualified for, and he is an embarrassment to most people in the US, and most all people in the World. He should be impeached as I have said in the past, he should have sent his daughters to war instead of my son, he should never ask a Black to risk his or her life to offer democracy to Iraq's that Blacks will never achieve during his regime in this country. He should be tried for war crimes as he is advocating for Sadam Hussen. The same treatment Sadam receives should be the same he should get for his past and present crimes against humanity prior to the unlawful invasion of Iraq. I would ask Cindy to tell Bush that he and his regime would be doing the world a favor if they would leave
office immediately. Again I state that neither Bush nor any president should ask any" BLACK in this racist country to risk his life or to be put in harms way, due to the manner in which blacks have and are yet being denied equal opportunities in this racist society. While speaking to him you must realize that due to his intellect he will most likely have to consult with his advisor, Carl Rove, also called by Bush "TURD SMASHER", to give you a somewhat intelligent answer to my statements which I want you to present on my behalf. Thanks for your involvement in a cause all reasonable Americans should support.

32 out of 35 MoveOn.org people agreed with this

MoveOn.org Action Forum: Black and Muslim soldiers should refuse orders

2007-07-10T11:21:00.001-04:00

United Nations should Control U.S.

From MoveOn.org's Action Forum

I ask that the UN investigate and bring appropriate charges against Bush and this administration. I demand that Congress and the UN fully investigate this administration and not allow another invasion to occur without UN sanction. This occupation must end now. The UN must take control now not later. Congress must act now. The UN must perform its duties now before dictators such as Bush achieve his goal of Caucasians ruling the world. If help is not received from Congress and the UN, I ask that the Civil Rights Organizations, Black and Muslim religious organizations, join with me in asking all Black and Muslim soldiers and civilians to refuse to support this illegal occupation of Iraq by this 'son of a bush'. See: www.outbush2005.blogspot.com

7 out of 9 agree. And the material at outbush2005.blogspot.com is even worse.

MoveOn.org's Action Forum on "Republicans, Jews, and Blacks"

2007-07-09T15:42:00.000-04:00

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=309909

Please read this posting very carefully before you get your 'shorts' all bunched up! If you want to deliberately miss the point -- that's O K -- not everyone is ready to take a look at their real self.

What do they all have in common?

They all yell bloody murder when anyone says anything that they think is directed at their society. If you attack anyone in their society, they think that they might be next. The problem is, is that they mentally identify themselves, as part of a particular group and not part of the whole!

Truth has nothing to do with it -- they all scream at the same time -- the Republicans will unite, and scream, whenever anyone outside there own party challenges their base! The Blacks will scream and play the race card anytime one of their own is singled out! (How many will still proclaim OJ's innocence?) Israel will play the Holocaust card and scream in unison when Israel is shown to be less than perfect!

With Israel and Blacks, this is their way of preventing any chance of the past injustices being repeated! They are still afraid that the past may repeat itself if they don't "stick together"! Its their defence against admitting one of their own could be wrong. Most of the Jewish people in the United States support Israel about the same way we support this country. We can acknowledge and criticize our own country's many mistakes. We can express our 'outrage' of what is going on, but when an 'outsider' criticizes this country, we rise up as one to defend the United States!

We defend this country because we see this country as it should be, not as it is! We refuse to take responsibility for who and what we really are as a country. After all we didn't vote for this administration and we think it very unfair when anyone includes us in their criticism of what this country is doing! Its the old story we judge ourselves by our intentions while judging others by what they do!

I think a good example of this is when that British newspaper ran that headline when Bushit was re-elected! "How could 50 some million people be so stupid?" [Answer: we didn't want a MoveOn.org/ Soros-backed agent like John Kerry.] ... They seek safety in the group just as untrained Infantry will "bunch up" when frightened.
http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=309909

MoveOn.org: Negro soldiers cannot be trusted with weapons

2007-07-05T14:51:00.000-04:00

From MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum:

Bring Black Troops home/send bush's daughters
To serve in the US to protect the homeland and our human rights, being violated by the Bush Regime. I recently spoke to an African American Marine Officer, who was disturbed about how Black Marines are being treated prior and during Bush’s illegal occupation of Irag. He related to me that if it wasn’t for the low ranking Black Marines who were being discriminated against, and he felt they needed his help, he himself would resign. For this and other reasons Blacks serving in the armed services should not become solders of fortune, but instead should be assigned to protect the human rights of African Americans, and all people regardless of color or faith. This country should also realize why Blacks are not obligated to shed blood for this country. They will not be able to share in the spoils and benefits if any are derived from this invasion, and others. They nor their love ones in their life time will receive equal opportunities in this country. For Blacks to receive the discipline basically the military have to offer, and minorities are so much in need, I would suggest that they recruit Blacks, keep them in safe positions state side and not allow them a weapon, because they may use it against those they perceive to be their enemy.

10 out of 13 MoveOn Action Forum participants agree that African-American service members are potential mutineers who cannot be trusted with weapons. Note also the part about how them ~~nappy headed pickaninnies~~ Black people are "so much in need" of discipline. All that are missing here are the sheets, hoods, and burning crosses.

This also was posted, apparently by the same individual, at outbush2005.blogspot.com

MoveOn.org Action Forum: Jesus' followers were ignorant

2007-07-03T14:21:00.000-04:00

From MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=299917 (still "on vacation to conserve technology bandwidth")

Anybody trying to bring peace to the Middle East would have to claim to be some kind of a Divine Messenger, they're just that Ignorant. When you consider the region were Jesus lived, and if you were trying to help them, you might would have to tell them you were the Son of God, just to get them to quit fighting amongst themselves, and Pay Attention. The Requirements of Freedom fly far above their heads.

5 out of 9 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE

MoveOn.org: "George Bush is the Antichrist"

2007-06-29T12:31:00.000-04:00

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?comment_id=302522 (MoveOn.org Action Forum, still "on vacation to conserve technology bandwidth" for the 2006 election)

When Satan comes to America, he will be waving a flag, and carrying a cross and riding on the back of a "patriotic Republican elephant".
He will be a phony Texan with a Yale bought degree, who was AWOL in Vietnam and who stole from Harken Energy.
He will be placed in power by a group of criminal minds who have wrested power from WE THE PEOPLE. The devil will be cruel, psychotic and mean-spirited while trumpeting his phony good ole boy brand of hate against the Blacks, and the women and the gays of the world.
In fact, he will be Hitler and Pol Pot and Stalin and Mussolini reborn as a many headed monster who stages a false flag operation that will nuclear attack nations for their oil.
He will bankrupt both financially and morally America lives while he destroys peace and justice in the world.
Hello, America. George W. Bush is the AntiChrist. He is the murderer of Justice and Liberty and Truth. You have let him come into your house, and act like he is your elected president.
Bush is Big Brother. Big Brother is Satan.

19 out of 20 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE with this statement. This is rational dialogue from MoveOn.org.

MoveOn.org person is Sure Readers have had Bad Experiences with Jews

2007-06-28T12:13:00.000-04:00

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?comment_id=302833 (still "on vacation to conserve technology bandwidth")

I respect everybody's opinion but obviously some people hate Jews. I am sure they have their reasons but they should not let whatever bad experience they had with some Jews (and I am sure they had some) interfere with their judgment.

9 out of 10 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE

MoveOn.org: "Jews do SOMETHING to make people hate them"

2007-06-27T13:07:00.000-04:00

Evangelical Christians also are a problem

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?comment_id=302257 (still "on vacation to conserve technology bandwidth for the 2006 election)

Iraq has done nothing to us.
We haven’t seen a drop of free Iraqi oil, wont, and shouldn’t.
Our government wants to punish Iraq, Iran and Syria for being adversaries of the Israeli occupation of Palestinians.
How do I know? Well I watch the congressional votes. There is a much higher percentage of yes votes where applicable to Israel than for any other legislation.
Aid for Israelis per capita exceeds that given to any other group including Americans.
I believe that Israelis and their bad behavior is a product of all our money and the strings placed on it by AIPAC, congress, Evangelists and American Jews.
Yes, we have and will go to war for Israel.
Why were Jews hated in Germany, Russia, France, Italy, and the US and around the world. I’d guess they handle success poorly.

9 out of 11 MoveOn.org Action Forum participants voted to AGREE

MoveOn.org: "Not infested with Arab hating Jews."

2007-06-26T12:45:00.000-04:00

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?comment_id=302298 (still "on vacation to conserve technology bandwidth" for the 2006 election)

First the republicans used fear to motivate us to support the war, then the democrats seeing it working decided to capitalize on fear by stating that the republicans are not strong enough on homeland defense.
I advocate no homeland defense and had you elected Nader, Kucinich or Dean you’d have no reason to fear either.
Yes I live a long way from New York and we are not infested with Arab hating Jews.
Fear costs you money and anxiety, overcoming it will set you free.

10 out of 11 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE with this statement

MoveOn.org Action Forum praises Hitler, wishes U.S. never existed

2007-06-25T12:02:00.001-04:00

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=285174

First, you’re right about one thing: Bush is no Hitler. Hitler was a socialist and believed in something beside money. He did not dodge real military service and he believed at least in Germany which was a real nation and not a corporation like the US. Moreover, Hitler did not use depleted uranium and phosphorous to burn people alive. He did not condone the torture of prisoners “for fun” or “to relieve stress”.
Second, regarding 9/11, you obviously are ill informed. Let me refer you to a few videos and web sites that might open your Jewish eyes (no offense, I am Jewish myself and was once blind too).
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2023320890224991194
http://www.911truestory.com or http://www.911truth.org
Aren’t you curious about why Bush was against a 9/11 Commission? Why no real police investigation was conducted? Why no black box, parts of planes like engines or bodies were recovered? Why whatever was recovered was quickly shipped out of the country? Why, in a way that is totally unprecedented and not repeated since, buildings burned and collapsed like paper houses even the building that wasn‘t hit by planes and where there were just two minor fires? Did you know that some of the alleged hijackers who supposedly died on the planes have since been seen? Don’t you ask why the volume of put options on Boeing and American Airlines were two or three times higher than usual just before the facts? Do you know that a huge amount of gold that was stored in one of the towers is still not accounted for? These are but a few of the many questions that remain unanswered.
I wish that before you publish a book about the Menace in Europe, you think about the real damage that this country has inflicted on mankind since it came into existence 200 plus years ago.

12 of 15 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE

MoveOn.org really has those Jews pegged, doesn't it?

2007-06-22T13:38:00.000-04:00

From MoveOn.org's Action Forum, still "on vacation to conserve technology bandwidth for the 2006 election" http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=287499

The American Jewish Committee obviously has money to spend. Their ad against Iran in yesterday's New York Times shows that the Committee is American only in name and should change its name to the Israeli Jewish Committee. If Iran is a threat to the region, what about Israel? How many countries can Israel destroy with its 200 plus nuclear warheads and all its planes, tanks and submarines? If they think Israel is threatened, there is an honorable way to help: make aliah (emigrate to Israel). I am sure they will be welcome.

9 out of 10 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE with this

MoveOn.org asks, "How can we have high level people in our government making foreign policy decisions when they are Jewish?"

2007-06-21T13:54:00.000-04:00

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=285709 (The Action Forum is still "on vacation" to "conserve technology bandwidth" for the 2006 election).

With the myriad of reasons for the Iraq invastion, (now discounted) the real reason we preemptively invaded Iraq was for the security of Israel and for it's goal of usurping more land, power and oil from it's Arab neighbors. The AIPAC is the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. No politician can be critical of Israeli policy without risking losing the money, votes and the power of this lobby. They all know it is political suicide to do so. This is the dirty little secret that no one can talk about! Another big problem is conflict of interest. How can we have high level people in our government making foreign policy decisions when they are Jewish Americans? It is a cystal clear case of conflict of interest. Their loyalty is to Israel and it has become our loyalty too above what is good for America. No other interests should be above American interest, but this is not the case. Our government is in the horrible position now of fighting this war for the benefit of Israel without their help (don't want a WWW3 situation), without their money and we are losing American lives for a lie. Iraq has never been any kind of threat to America. They are a threat to Israel. Sure we would like to get our hands on Iraqi oil, but that's not why we are there. The Israeli lobby started asking us to start a war with in the Clinton administration. We wouldn't do it, but when 9-11 happened George decided he could tie them to it and show the rest of the world they better not mess with us in the process. Of course the "cooked up WMD's" were largely a result of Jewish Americans in the intelligence community. Please read "A Clean Break". It describes how this is just the initial step by Israel to change the whole Middle East. Our Pro-Israeli foreign policy is the whole reason for the 9-11 attacks. We let Israel continue to build illegal settlements on Arab land in the Gaza and commit human rights violations one after the other. Although this may not be reported much in our media, the whole rest of the world knows that we allowed the "occupiers" to have free reign and it is making enemies for us world wide. Israel started out as a little country created by the Balfour Declaration after the holocoust tragedy. It has since tripled in size with every preemptive invasion and conquest of the Palestinian and Arab land surrounding it and they are not willing to give any bit of it back. They say they will and then they don't. The peace process now is nonexistant ever since George decided to have a hands off policy over there. This was very foolish. If there is no peace there, there will be no safety for America either. We give Israel over 3 BILLION dollars a year. No one else gets anywhere near that? I resent that my tax money is used in this way. These are the sad facts that need to be addressed by Move-On. Don't be scared to tell the truth...Thank you. - Dawn Richeyd, lender (March 22, 2006; Henderson, NV)

8 out of 9 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE that the "cooked up WMD's" were largely a result of Jewish Americans in the intelligence community."

MoveOn.org on "Fat, White, Rich Christians"

2007-06-20T12:12:00.001-04:00

Hate speech du jour from MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum, which is still "on vacation" for the 2006 election.

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?comment_id=228956

We would have more women candidates, more black, hispanic, asian descent, native-american, middle eastern descent that truly represent our society. Not fat, white, rich Christians who represent themselves and their fat rich friends.

4 of 4 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE with this hate speech directed against Christians. Barack Obama appeared at a MoveOn PAC event last year.

MoveOn.org: Jesus was a Fraud

2007-06-19T12:23:00.000-04:00

From MoveOn.org's disgraced and still "on vacation for the 2006 election" Action Forum

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=230305

Christians ("so-called..") believe that Jesus (a Jewish rabbi and wannabe Jewish messiah) died for them and saved their souls when he couldn't even save his own skin let alone the Jewish people. Jews consider any non-Jew as inferior ("the Chosen"). Moslems want to convert everybody. I hear that Buddhists are not that tolerant either. My conclusion: turn churches, temples and mosques into social centers and priests, rabbis, etc into social workers to help the poor and the homeless. If people need religion, let them practice at home. Religion should not be subsidized by the State. The world would be a much better place without fundamentalists of all sorts.

11 of 16 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE with this hatred of Christians, Jews, Muslims, and Buddhists

MoveOn.org: African-American Soldiers should Desert

2007-06-12T01:17:00.000-04:00

Black soldiers should desert or refuse orders, says MoveOn's hate-filled Action Forum.

Original link (the Action Forum is still "on vacation" du to the scandal) http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?comment_id=287544

Just say no! Ask what is in it for you or your family. Ask how will your family or love ones benefit if we win or lose in Iraq? Ask can you or your love ones gain fair employment, managerial positions or ownership in Halliburton and other industries who are beneficiaries of this illegal occupation? Then make a truthful statement to your commanding officer and the press as to how you are probably discriminated against by your superiors. I would suggest you then offer them your weapon, after realizing who your enemy maybe. Upon your return to America, ask bush how his appointing Alito a racist to the Supreme Court will improve Blacks freedom and opportunities in this country. See; http://www.outbush2005.blogspot.com

13 out of 14 MoveOn.org people voted to AGREE with this

Robert Byrd Jokes

2007-06-06T02:51:00.001-04:00

MoveOn.org loves Robert Byrd, KKK-WV, and Barack Obama signed a fundraising letter for his campaign

Q: What is Robert Byrd's favorite gas station?
A: Sheetz; it reminds him of what he wore when he was hanging out with the good old boys. We won't get into whom the good old boys might have been hanging at the time.

Q: Why did Robert Byrd stop liking Iron Maiden?
A: He loved the line "I am a clansman" until he saw the lyrics and realized that "The Clansman" is about a Scotsman.

Q: Why did Robert Byrd stop liking Lord of the Rings?
A: He found out that Bilbo is a hobbit, not the famous segregationist Theodore Bilbo (who was apparently Byrd's mentor).

Q: Why did Robert Byrd stop liking the TV series "Knight Rider?"
A: He watched a few episodes, and not one single night rider showed up to put Black people in their places.

One of Robert Byrd's close friends said one morning, "Bob, I've got a Negro in my family tree."

"I'm right sorry to hear that," Byrd replied.

"No problem, Bob, my family and I just strung him up this morning."

MoveOn.org: ""Christian Zionist Tribe" must be removed"

2007-06-02T12:28:00.000-04:00

Hate speech du jour from MoveOn.org's disgraced (and still "on vacation" due to the scandal) Action forum; this was the original link.
http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=310659

Israel would not exist without Christian Zionists. Christian Zionists are ultimately responsible for whatever Israel does, whether they realize it or not! Blaming Israel is like blaming an unattended child for causing trouble. Of course they're going to play dumb and say they're powerless over Israel! We're supposed to fall for that. The US Gov. could stomp Israel like a bug, if we had to! That's where their Christian Zionist "beliefs" mix with US laws and rational Foreign Policy. They are allowing Israel to commit autrocities, because of their beliefs. Civilized people must put and end to this State Sponsored Religion. We must remove this Christian Zionist Tribe from our government. Once people's afterlives become involved, the Material World doesn't matter anymore! And Greed will profit from the resulting Atrocities, as it always has!

9 of 12 voted to AGREE with this

MoveOn.org: "Vietnam Veterans were Mercenaries"

2007-05-31T12:18:00.000-04:00

We wonder if the MoveOn.org-er who posted this to the Action Forum (still "on vacation to conserve technology bandwidth" for the 2006 election) is also the individual who burned flags on veterans' graves in Washington State, and then put swastikas on them.

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?comment_id=311195

Mr Goody-two-shoes, I hope you didn’t volunteer for Vietnam, otherwise you are just a mercenary like the others. Did you ever wonder what the Vietnamese did to you to be killed by the millions and to have their country burned to the ground? I wasn’t even referring to the atrocities committed in places like Abu Ghraib but to plain prostitution, the only way to survive for women and children widowed and orphaned by the US war machine. It is a fact that a prostitute in Afghanistan costs the equivalent of 25 cents. Now, don’t tell me you never saw a prostitute during your stay in Vietnam. Anyway I would have no way to disprove your claim because these are things heroes like you don’t brag about.

11 of 13 MoveOn.org people AGREED to spit on our veterans yet again

MoveOn.org: "Israelis Ashamed of their Jewish Past"

2007-05-25T12:35:00.000-04:00

MoveOn.org anti-Semitic hate speech du jour
http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=307279

More than anything else, Lebanon is being used as a testing ground for new American weapons, never mind that children are being killed in the process! I only hope that the rebuilding will not be entrusted to Halliburton, Bechtel and other US war profiteers. As for linking Israel's actions with the issue of anti-semitism, that's totally out of place. The Israelis see themselves as a new race and a new nation and are rather ashamed of their Jewish past.

7 of 7 voted to AGREE with this

MoveOn.org on Why Jews Deserved the Holocaust

2007-05-24T12:15:00.000-04:00

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=309094 (Original URL of the MoveOn.org posting; the Action Forum is sitll "on vacation to conserve technology bandwidth" for last November's election. Our comments are in brackets.

The Jews have 9,000 prisoners the Arabs have 3.
It’s the Jews that are trying to push the Arabs into the sea by occupying and annexing their land, bulldozing refugee camps and orchards.
The Jews are killing the Arabs on a ratio of 10 to 1.
The Palestinians live in a prison, no way in or out without passing through an abusive Jewish guard gate. [In other words, the same way Americans must pass through metal detectors and let TSA personnel inspect their carry-on luggage before we get on airplanes.]
The Jews demand that the Pals. disarm prior to any negotiating of what if anything they’ll get back. That is called begging not negotiating.
Nearly 3/4 of the entire Jewish population was exterminated. If you can’t tell us why, We are stuck with logic and commonsense.
I’m saying Jews instead of Israelis because I read the Israeli newspapers, the “Israeli Lobby” papers and have seen the House vote 410-8 in support Israel while the UN typically votes 191-4 against Israel. Also the billions in aid and military equipment are conspicuous. The world court unanimously voted against Israel.
By blaming Hitler you don’t have to face the truth.
I will stop condemning Jews when they become acclimated with all people.
Stop professing to know and start reading.

9 of 12 MoveOn.org people voted to AGREE with this

MoveOn.org: "Remove Israel-Obsessed Jews from Congress"

2007-05-22T14:55:00.000-04:00

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=304961
(MoveOn's Action Forum, where this appeared, is still "on vacation to conserve technology bandwidth" for the 2006 elections.)

Israel has 8,000 Palestinian prisoners, Hezbollah and Hamas has 3 Israeli prisoners. Israel is killing civilians and their children with our missiles and has never stopped stealing Palestinian land, farms, and precious aquifers.
Removing all Israeli obsessed Jews from congress would stop a lot of killing.

12 of 14 MoveOn.org people voted to AGREE with this

MoveOn.org: The U.S. Government Perpetrated 9/11

2007-05-21T11:45:00.000-04:00

From MoveOn.org's Action Forum at http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=312448 (still "on vacation to conserve technology bandwidth" for the 2006 election). MoveOn.org accuses Rudy Guliani of getting his own police and firefighters killed.

On ABC and 9/11program - MoveOn should be leading the investigation
To the extent that the impeachment of Clinton was a diversion then it could be that a lot of the people to let it happen were put in place in Clinton's administration. Hasn't anyone ever wondered why Tenet and Freeh were kept on in a George 'the decider' Bush's administration?
It took a lot of people in key positions to pull off 9/11 and it would be doubtful that they were all placed after Bush took office.
The people in place to prevent murder investigations were as necessary as the ones to let it happen.
It still seems probable that something went wrong and the operation had to be aborted and that is the reason the buildings had to be detonated and bldg 7 had to be blown. If Chicago and the west coast had been burning and the White House had been hit then martial law could easily have been declared. In their 'perfect planning' could they have overlooked the potential of ordering of all planes to be immediately grounded?
Such details as getting John O'Neil into the WTC to be eliminated in some manner took a lot of high level doings. And people seem to think that was just a coincidence.
How did Rudy Giuliani let so many of his Police and Firemen get killed and then be given 'hero' status????????
Think about those things - and many more.

8 of 13 MoveOn.org people voted to AGREE with these statements

MoveOn.org: 9/11 was an Inside Job

2007-05-19T12:35:00.000-04:00

From MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum, still "on vacation to conserve technology bandwidth" for the 2006 election.
http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?comment_id=313091

I continue to believe that this is the ONLY issue that really matters, because it is the only one that transcends political affiliations. It is not an issue of debate, or opinion, or politics if it is shown that our current administration planned and executed 9/11. No one could argue that killing our own citizens in order to stay in power and promote their own ends is a reasonable political "strategy". Scholarsfor9/11Truth.org are investigating the facts, not conjecture. We do not need to whine about unvetted videos. The facts are there, waiting to be investigated. Where is the examination of the crime scene? Where is the collection of eyewitness reports, (where early witnesses at both the Pentagon and the Pennsylvania crash site reported clearly that THERE WAS NO AIRLINER!) [Tell that to Todd Beamer's family and the families of everyone else on Flight 93.] Where is the forensic evidence - what can still be found of it? Why have our leaders not been prosecuted for destroying the crime scenes, if nothing else? There is overwhelming evidence that the "identified" Al Quaida terrorists were probably not the perpetrators, since many of them have been found alive and well by the BBC. [Last we heard, they were seen in a UFO with Elvis Presley.] The FBI itself has acknowledged openly that they have no evidence to charge Osama Bin Laden! We all know the 9/11 commission was a sham - at least one of their members has said it was miserably incomplete. Fema has reported that THEY DO NOT KNOW why building 7 fell down. Doesn't anyone care to find out why one of our best skyscrapers (of which there are thousands still in use) just crumbled because of a small fire in its corner??? Hello!!!! Where is the REAL investigation? And who really produced all those animated "explanations" - which have been shown to be as accurate as the new Disney 9/11 movie ? Are we to simply believe the fanciful "conspiracy theories" our government packaged and fed us, or will we demand the truth?

12 of 14 voted to AGREE with this

MoveOn.org: A Missile Destroyed the World Trade Center

2007-05-18T19:20:00.000-04:00

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?comment_id=312418 (This is where the following appeared; needless to say, MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum is still "on vacation" to "conserve technology bandwidth" for the 2006 election season.)

Did Anyone Watch the AlteraVista tape Showing A Missle Hole Not An Airplane Shape into the Pentagon? And many other things from video and reporters as 9/11 was happening that it isn't what it looks like. One thing is true that we Do know: American Citizens died as pawns. Let's get to the truth, however painful it is going to be to discover. Our nation's future depends on it.

9 of 11 MoveOn.org people voted to AGREE with this

MoveOn.org: "Evangelical Christians seek to hasten Armageddon"

2007-05-16T19:22:00.000-04:00

Blood libel of Evangelical Christians, from MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum.

Evangelical Christians seek to hasten Armageddon

I am continually dismayed by our lack of focus on the president's dangerous religious beliefs and how they are informing the agenda of his administration. As an Evangelical Christian, the president is doing his part to hasten armageddon, as evidenced by his middle-east policies. He would like nothing more than full scale war between the Jews, Christians and Muslims, as has been prophesisied in the Bible. Also keep in mind that the Evangelicals have no great love for the Baptists or the Catholics, many of whom the president managed to kill in New Orleans. Yet the president's Evangelical Christian agenda is largely ignored - and it needs to be exposed.

9 out of 11 MoveOn.org people agreed with this hate speech.

Daily Kos commentator: "Gas Joe Lieberman like a dog"

2007-05-16T19:14:00.000-04:00

Daily Kos-er wants to gas "Jew Lieberman," as MoveOn.org's people call him, like a dog.

MoveOn.org: "World Trade Centers were blown up"

2007-05-14T12:03:00.000-04:00

9/11 Denial from MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?comment_id=312664
Any one who saw the collapse of the two World Trade Center towers would have to be blind not to see that they were imploded from within due to controlled demolition, especially since the third WTC building collapsed exactly the same way without being struck by any airplane. As Jesus Christ said: "There are none so blind as they who will not see". I guess us lemmings are all as blind as though we all were victims of mass hypnosis. Let us open our eyes for a change and 'see'.

11 of 15 MoveOn.org-ers voted to AGREE with this

National Jewish Democratic Council Slams Glenn Beck over Lieberman comment

2007-05-12T12:31:00.000-04:00

but has no problems with worse from MoveOn.org

The latest from NJDC's Steve Rabin

Thanks once again to phenomenal research by our friends at Media Matters for America (and a tip to NJDC by Town Crier), Glenn Beck has been exposed once again. This time, he told his radio audience that he would not vote for Joe Lieberman to be president because his Jewishness is a problem in the Middle East.

However, the National Jewish Democratic Council's Ira Forman gave MoveOn.org a pass for statements like these:

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?comment_id=311900

Congressman Tom Lantos told PM Olmert of Israel that he wants to freeze the $ 230 million U.S. aid package to Lebanon. Lantos is the ranking democrat on the House Foreign Relations Comte. Lantos said, "The [Lebanese] aid package should be witheld until the Lebanese government displays responsibility". Responsibility ? Israel is guilty of war crimes in their cowardely attack on Lebanon and the whining, arrogant Jew wants Lebanon to demonstrate responsibility ! This is another example of how many Jews/Zioniosts in our Congress use the U.S. for their own greedy purposes. DUMP ISRAEL.

14 out of 17 MoveOn.org people voted to AGREE with this

"Jew Lieberman is done, Corporate Clinton is next..." read another post in MoveOn's Action Forum. In the case of Hillary Clinton, the MoveOn people now seem to be eating their own--sort of like the French Terror, when they finally put Robespierre in the guillotine.

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=309875
We need your help in finding a word that is less offensive.
One that describes the Jewish congressmen and Jewish owned media that has a greater allegiance to Israel than the US. And who are demonizing Israel’s neighbors and supporting Israel’s bombing and occupation.
Read "Israeli Lobby" google it.
7 of 8 voted to AGREE with this

The National Jewish Democratic Council has double standards when it comes to criticizing Republicans and Democrats, which means it has no standards whatsoever--and therefore no character, honor, or integrity.

From MoveOn.org: Rice and Powell are "House Slaves"

2007-05-12T02:59:00.000-04:00

Racist hate speech du jour from MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum.

The following link shows that the Action Forum is still "on vacation," i.e. MoveOn.org had to take it down when this sort of thing began to circulate on the Internet. In this case, the MoveOn.org participant derided prominent African-Americans as "house slaves."

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?comment_id=276832

Thanks Harry, for telling it like it is. Rice and Powell ARE "house slaves". And
the "Republicans ARE like the Jews who worked for Hitler". And Shrub IS "a tyrant and a terrorist". Harry, we need people like you in Congress.

12 of 15 Action Forum participants voted to AGREE with this

MoveOn.org is a hate group, plain and simple. Why do people still support it?

MoveOn.org: "Jews Subvert Governments"

2007-05-11T20:14:00.000-04:00

MoveOn.org Action Forum: "Jews have a long history of subverting governments for their own enrichment"

If you click the link for the source of this hate speech, you will see that MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum is still "on vacation." And this but one of the many reasons why.

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=294678

We can all see how AIPAC/Israel has taken control of America. Not to get nasty but jews have a long history of subverting governments for their own enrichment and glory to the detriment of whole societies. Many more than "6 million" have died by semetic aggression, 100's of millions even, remember the conqueror writes history. Even the roman empire feared jewish power. Over and over again, whites, particularly semites have distorted truth through their supremacist, zenophobic minds. Ariel Sharon Oct of 2001 per Kol
Israel, "... Don't worry about america, we control america and the americans know it." There is a mental pathology gripping my tribe, as the native americans say, "white man have forked tongue", we must become enlightened, or we will be destroyed.

13 of 16 MoveOn.org people voted to AGREE with this

Jewish Funds for Justice and Jspot: New Home for Progressive Jewish Democrats

2007-05-10T14:26:00.000-04:00

We never thought we would find ourselves agreeing with Jewschool blogger Mobius, but his On the road to Jewish self-government has an outstanding idea: make Jewish Funds for Justice's Jspot the chief organizing entity for Jewish Democratic progressives.

There is no doubt that Jewish (and in fact all decent) progressives need an alternative to MoveOn.org, given the latter's track record of promoting anti-Semitic hate speech (including blood libels that say the Talmud commands Jews to hate and even kill non-Jews), saying that Israel should not exist, and publishing official bulletins that seem to support this position.

Jspot.org is the obvious choice. While we do not agree with many of its political positions, others (like support for worker safety, and especially that of mine workers), are no-brainers that both parties ought to be supporting. Unlike MoveOn.org, Jspot.org is not a nest for hate-mongers or Israel-haters.

We recommend that progressive Democrats look at this post by Mik Moore.

The plan is simple. Thousands of Jews come together to create a domestic agenda
that represents our interests. We send this agenda to every presidential candidate and request a written response. As candidates reply we publicize their views on our websites, via email, and through the press.
If you want to see a presidential campaign where the candidates address your concerns, you have to tell them what you think.
Interested? Click here to add your vote.

We understand that progressives may have felt torn between the need for a "progressive" organization like MoveOn.org, and dislike of MoveOn.org's reprehensible promotion of 9/11 denial plus hate speech directed at Jews, Catholics, and others. It looks like we have just found a win-win solution.

MoveOn.org Action Forum: "Israel is the Main Problem in the Middle East"

2007-05-10T13:26:00.000-04:00

More from MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum:
note how one posting cites the International Solidarity Movement (which has actual ties with Palestinian terrorists), which is eminently consistent with Noah Winer's official bulletin citing the Electronic Intifada.

Another 3 " militants" were murdered by Israeli helicopters and soldiers in Gaza today- airstrikes in urban areas are constructive murder-and to make it perfectly clear to all that the genocide of Palestinians is the object the Israeli forces then demoloished the building that the " militants" were in. Israel is the main problem in the Middle East.
===========================

J.F. Dragon, no I cannot agree with your premise as stated above about all Middle East Arab countries. Before you start this Anti-Semitic rhetoric, have you ever asked yourself why so many are against Israel? Have you studied how Israel was created through terrorist means against Arabs (Palestinians) and the then occupying British? Israel formed their country by stealing land away from its then rightful owners through terrorist means. So perhaps it was those European terrorist Jews that started this current round of hatred toward a country that was formed by stealing land away from the resident Palestinians without any humanitarian compensation for where they are to go from there. How would you feel about foreign invaders stealing your Grandparents or parents land and home to bulldoze it down and then give it to a foreign born person, just because they are Jewish or whatever that invader’s faith and nationality is?
==================================

Phyllis Bennis (Jewish), a longtime analyst and activist around Middle East issues, is now head of the Middle East Project at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C. She is the author of From Stones to Statehood: The Palestinian Uprising, a book about the Palestinian intifada of the late 1980s, and Calling the Shots: How Washington Dominates Today's U.N. In this interview, Phyllis analyzes the racist character of Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza as well as its treatment of Palestinians who live within Israel's pre-1967 borders.
Phyllis Bennis: What's going on right now can be summed up in one word: occupation. Contrary to the U.S. media's portrayal, the Israeli occupation of Palestine is at the root of what the media at best identify only as a "disproportionate" use of violence by the Israelis on the West Bank and Gaza.
Certainly the Israeli troops' use of helicopter gunships, of machine guns mounted on tanks, and so on is profoundly disproportionate when used against a Palestinian civilian population armed only with stones and some old Kalashnikov rifles.
===============================

Israeli Occupation Force Opens Fire On Palestinian Worshippers
IOF troops stationed in al-Ram neighborhood at the edge ofoccupied Jerusalem opened fire at West Bank Palestinians trying toenter the holy city to attend the Friday prayers at the Aqsa Mosque.Please copy, e-mail, re-post and distribute this as widely as possible. Also for those without Internet access.
Take Action, sign on to the letter at http://www.cflweb.org/ political action and tell Congress to stop using your tax dollars to support Israeli terrorism. For further political action and information see http://www.cnionline.org and http://www.endtheoccupation.org/ and http://www.palsolidarity.org/main/ and http://www.nowarforisrael.com and http://www.pchrgaza.org/ and http://www.voicesofpalestine.org/ and http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/am/publish/

palsolidarity.org = the International Solidarity Movement, which has ties with actual Hamas terrorists.

MoveOn.org Action Forum: "Israel Should Not Exist"

2007-05-10T11:50:00.001-04:00

And "Jews control the media"

Prior to MoveOn.org's taking its now-disgraced Action Forum offline, we downloaded about 30 megabytes (7500 posts) of its content for inspection at our leisure. (The following prizes were found by searching with WordPad; the huge files seem to choke standard browsers.) It is truly amazing what some people define as "not anti-Semitic," noting that Barack Obama's friend Al Sharpton says Louis "Judaism is a gutter religion" Farrakhan is not an anti-Semite, and his own term "Greek homos" is not derogatory of gay people. Also note that the following post is entirely consistent with Noah T. Winer's official bulletin, which cites anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian sources like Gush Shalom and Electronic Intifada.

To be anti-Zionist, or even anti-Jewish, is not by definition anti-Semitic. According to what I've read, the Arabs, Jews, and others are all Semitic. It is not a question of Race, it is a question of justice. Anyone who takes the time to become familiar with the history of the creation of, and the acts of the Jewish State of Israel can come to no other conclusion that it should not exist where it does in the first place.

"Some of my best friends are Jews!" says this MoveOn.org-er.

Terry McFee and Israel supporters: stop the unsupported blind bias towards Israel’s hatred of Palestinians and Arabs.

I am friends with many American Jews, European Jews and Israeli Jews. Most of all of these Jewish friends and associates do not support your blind bias towards the Israeli government as do you Terry and a few others on this forum. Evil is evil no matter who is the person or government committing such acts. Terrorism is terrorism, no matter what pretty name you assign to it such as: ”self-defense”.

No terrorism should be tolerated and Israel should have never been recognized to create a state as a result of terrorist acts.

Israel was rewarded for being terrorist by granting them recognition of a state created by nothing but terrorism and no diplomacy.

Terry McFee, I am really getting tired of reading your vast post here that state the exact same thing as your previous post before that one without any documented proof of anything you claim against everyone, but Israel. You claim about all Palestinians and Arabs want Israel destroyed, but you do not explain or attempt to defend how Israel was created by nothing more than terrorism toward the inhabitant.

"Close down Israel"

People are growing weary of the childish Neocon promotion of fear of boogeymen. Islamic hostilities will go away the minute Israel is closed down and the Jews all move to the US where they should have come to begin with.

Another posting includes the statement, "To be opposed to Israeli Zionist Apartheid Government is not to be taken as against all Jews."

Israel backed by army of cyber-soldiers

Israel's Government has thrown its weight behind efforts by supporters to counter what it believes to be negative bias and a tide of pro-Arab propaganda. The Foreign Ministry has ordered trainee diplomats to track websites and chatrooms so that networks of US and European groups with hundreds of thousands of Jewish activists can place supportive messages.

In the past week nearly 5,000 members of the World Union of Jewish Students (WUJS) have downloaded special "megaphone" software that alerts them to anti-Israeli chatrooms or internet polls to enable them to post contrary viewpoints. A student team in Jerusalem combs the web in a host of different languages to flag the sites so that those who have signed up can influence an opinion survey or the course of a debate.

This is cyberwar, and the net is right there on the front lines. This is why pro-truth sites are getting hacked, as well as people getting smeared, their businesses sabotaged, and their lives destroyed for the mere questioning of the current Israeli campaign.

So keep in mind that the person screaming at you about Israel's right to self-defense is probably working for the Israeli Foreign Ministry.

Here, MoveOn's people say that Jews would support Israel even if it were a fascist state, "which it looks more and more like." (Note that Freedom House rates Israel 1 for political freedoms and 2 for civil rights, with 1 being best and 7--the typical rating earned by neighbors like Syria--the worst.)

Not in my name

I haven't heard much protest from Jewish circles about the slaughter in Lebanon. I don't think this silence is very wise. I know Jews have only one state (Israel) and even if it were a fascist state, which it looks more and more like, they would still support its policies.

Fine, but if that is the case, they should be ready to pay the price in terms of international anger and frustration. Arabs and Moslems already hate the Jews and this is not going to make things better.

It is true also that often the Arabs and their supporters have cried wolf for no reason and now that they have a good reason, many won't listen to their grievances.

But one has to call a spade a spade, in this case the spade being the war crimes perpetrated in Palestine and Lebanon. It is essential that Jews distance themselves from whoever perpetrate those crimes.

The following is entirely consistent with Noah Winer's official pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel bulletin.

What about Israel’s defiance of UN resolutions?
- By Dr. Steven Harris
"In what is becoming a depressingly familiar pattern, the Israeli ‘Defence Forces’ have invaded Lebanon and are causing death and destruction by land, sea and air. What was astonishing to neutral observers was Israeli spokesmen talking about the need for Lebanon to observe UN Security Council Resolution 1559 passed in 2004. This called for a number of steps to happen for Lebanon – which included the call for militias to be disbanded. This Resolution was passed by 9 votes in favour and 6 abstentions – and those who chose to abstain included Russia and China."
"The Israelis were displaying their usual ‘chutzpah’ – a Jewish word roughly translated as audacity or effrontery. Israel has the dubious distinction of having had more negative UN Security Council Resolutions passed against it than any other member state. At last count the number was 66 and if the U.S. had not exercised its veto to save Israel the embarrassment of having yet another Resolution to ignore, the number would be 95! In fact, every U.S. veto used since 1986 in the Security Council was to protect Israel."

Take a look at this one:

I know that condemning all Jews is wrong,,,,
but I don’t have a word that describes the misguided, blood thirsty ones. Sorry. I can’t just say Israel because their US supporters may be the real instigators.
There are Arab Jews, black African Jews and European Jews.
There are 25,000 Jews living in Iran, many Lebanon and some have lived in Iraq.
Palestinians have been helped, befriended and married to Israeli Jews.
Many Jews in Israel and the US have been outspoken in support of the Palestinians.
The EU countries where many Jews have risen to the top always support the Palestinians in the UN and financially.
I also know that there is more than one Jew on this forum that condemns Israeli actions and their American supporters.

Well, MoveOn's Noah T. Winer certainly does...

And remember, according to MoveOn.org, Jews control the media!

Quit!!! bullying "MoveOn-" one of the few forums where democrats can still be heard and I'm not talking about pseudo-democrats (Clinton zealots with income and/or trust funds all in the high 6 or 7 figures). I'm sick of the monied-class elite's air of entitlement. Arrogance may be a luxury that a privileged minority unwisely indulge themselves.
But I can see why you might think you OWN! the media,or are entitled to: 8 JEWS RUN U.S. MEDIA Today, eight Jewish Americans run the vast majority of US television networks, the printed press, the Hollywood movie industry, the book publishing industry, and the recording industry.
Most of these industries are bundled into huge media conglomerates run by the following eight individuals:
Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner
Michael Eisner, Chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company
Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd
Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios
Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc
Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric
Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited
Fox News, which is of course owned by Rupert Murdock - also a jew.

And another:

Last night on PBS (News Hour/Washington Week) they talked about Lamont. The talking heads were my age (I did voter registration for CORE in '64) and talked about the Democratic Party and Clinton and Dean, et al. and how Cheney made favorable comments about Leiberman. Then they mentioned MoveOn and the Internet gen in passing as a kind of unknown. The Internet is now about 10 years old and the AOL kids are now in their mid 20's and 30's and working; they don't watch network tv, they get their news from the web, their community and culture is the Internet, and they have a growing influence on the world. We have discussed the Jewish control of the media ad nauseam here, but the 16 through 36 yr olds media is the Internet, and apparently not controlled by Jew (or else we would not have had the discussion at all).

Remember that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John Edwards all appeared at a MoveOn.org event to seek this group's approval and backing, just as they appeared with the prominent racist and anti-Semite Al Sharpton. MoveOn.org is a creation of America-hater and Israel-hater George Soros (who says America is a danger to world peace that is in need of "de-Nazification"). MoveOn's position, as supported by its official bulletins, that Israel should not exist is entirely consistent with George Soros' agenda.

Res ipsa loquitur, the thing speaks for itself. We are barely half way through the first file, and there will doubtlessly be more of this material to come.

MoveOn.org: "Jewish Congressmen more loyal to Israel than the US"

2007-05-10T00:17:00.000-04:00

Hate speech du jour from MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum. The link does not work because the Action Forum is still "on vacation" (i.e. taken down because of the scandal).

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=309875

We need your help in finding a word that is less offensive.
One that describes the Jewish congressmen and Jewish owned media that has a greater allegiance to Israel than the US. And who are demonizing Israel’s neighbors and supporting Israel’s bombing and occupation.
Read "Israeli Lobby" google it.

7 of 8 MoveOn.org Action Forum participants voted to AGREE with this anti-Semitic hate speech.

More Dishonesty from the National Jewish Democratic Council

2007-05-08T18:42:00.000-04:00

We checked the National Jewish Democratic Council's blog for its lie du jour, and we found Republican KKKongressman Honors KKK Founder by Quoting him on the House Floor. Steve Rabin seeks to equate a Republican House member with the Ku Klux Klan because he quoted Nathan Bedford Forrest on a totally unrelated issue, namely that of military strategy. This is but one example of the National Jewish Democratic Council's intellectual dishonesty, and we remind our readers of its own track record of anti-Christian and even anti-Semitic hate speech.

Here is how Steve Rabin attempts to connect Ted Poe to the Ku Klux Klan:

Rep Ted Poe, Republican of Texas said this on the House Floor:

"Nathan Bedford Forrest, successful Confederate general, said it best about winning and victory and the means to do so. He said, “Git thar fustest with the mostest.”"

Who is Nathan Bedford Forrest? The founder of the KKK.

Note how desperate Mr. Rabin is to smear Republicans on any pretext, noting that Poe was quoting Forrest not on race relations, but on military strategy. Nor was he "honoring" Forrest, he was merely citing a military precept that does indeed result in success. Now, we have posted the following to NJDC in response, but we are sure NJDC will not allow our response to appear.

Forrest's generalship, which is what Poe was citing, has nothing to do with what Forrest did after the war.

Meanwhile, what is your position on Robert Byrd's (KKK-WV) fitness to serve in the Senate?

We are quite confident that NJDC will not reply, because it has no answer. Per A Senator's Shame,

By Eric Pianin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, June 19, 2005; A01

In the early 1940s, a politically ambitious butcher from West Virginia named Bob Byrd recruited 150 of his friends and associates to form a chapter of the Ku Klux Klan. After Byrd had collected the $10 joining fee and $3 charge for a robe and hood from every applicant, the "Grand Dragon" for the mid-Atlantic states came down to tiny Crab Orchard, W.Va., to officially organize the chapter.

...Byrd said in the Dec. 11, 1945, letter -- which would not become public for 42 more years with the publication of a book on blacks in the military during World War II by author Graham Smith -- that he would never fight in the armed forces "with a Negro by my side." Byrd added that, "Rather I should die a thousand times, and see old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels."

...The letter was dated 1946 -- long after the time Byrd claimed he had lost interest in the Klan. "The Klan is needed today as never before, and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia," Byrd wrote, according to newspaper accounts of that period. Byrd makes no mention of the letter in his new book.

So according to the (double) standards of the National Jewish Democratic Council, Rep. Poe is a "Republican KKKongressman" for quoting a Klansman on a totally unrelated issue, while Senator Robert Byrd, who was personally active in the Ku Klux Klan, is not a "Democratic KKKongressman." This is far from surprising, noting the pass NJDC has given the leading Democratic Presidential candidates for appearing with Al Sharpton, a prominent racist and anti-Semite who has, at indirectly, helped incite two violent incidents in which people were killed. (Crown Heights riots and Freddy's Fashion Mart.) Meanwhile, NJDC's Ira Forman knowingly and willfully lied to cover up MoveOn.org's anti-Semitic and anti-Catholic hate speech.

The National "Jewish" "Democratic" Council is a double oxymoron, because it stands for nothing that any decent Jew or Democrat will acknowledge. Its long track record of lying (e.g. about MoveOn.org), double standards, and promulgation of hate against Christians and even Jews it happens to dislike, shows that it stands for absolutely nothing. The best service it can do the Democratic Party is to disband, and hope that people will forget that it ever existed.

MoveOn.org: "some were divorced and some had Jewish parents..."

2007-05-08T12:25:00.000-04:00

MoveOn.org Action Forum hate speech du jour. Note (if you click the link) that the Action Forum is still "on vacation."

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=310537
If you are a Jew and want respect;
Denounce Israel’s abuse and occupation of Palestinians for the last 50 yrs and stop spreading the lies you heard on Fox Israel News.
Condemn AIPACs manipulation of the US foreign policy.
Read and acknowledge the validity of the “Israeli Lobby” papers.
Until you do you’ll just sound like the Bush administration defending their reasons for going to war.
If you just can’t do it deny that you are Jewish.
Our parents abused some of us, some were drunks, some were divorced and some had Jewish parents. We don’t have to hang on to our past.

National Jewish Democratic Council Double Standards

2007-05-07T17:50:00.000-04:00

Steve Rabin's Right Wing Extremists for Romney condemns Mitt Romney's address to "right wing extremist Pat Robinson's Regent University." The blog entry cites several statements of Robertson's, which range from merely distasteful to completely reprehensible. However, despite our E-mail to NJDC (dated April 23), NJDC continues to ignore the appearance of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards (along with Richardson, Dodd, and Biden) at Al Sharpton's National Action Network: a racist and anti-Semitic hate organization that is every bit as reprehensible as the Ku Klux Klan or White Aryan Resistance. It is arguably a violent hate organization, noting its role in the Freddy's Fashion Mart incident in Harlem in 1995.

The following was just sent to njdc "at" njdc.org:

To Ira Forman and Steve Rabin (cc: blogs),

Re: Mr. Rabin's blog entry about Mitt Romney and Pat Robertson (http://njdc.typepad.com/njdcs_blog/2007/05/right_wing_extr.html).

Robertson's statement about Islam (" [T]he goal of Islam, ladies and gentlemen, whether you like it or not, is world domination") is accurate, noting that numerous demonstrations by militant "Muslims" feature signs that proclaim how Islam is going to dominate Europe, and even North America. Efforts by militant "Muslims" to introduce Sharia (fundamentalist Islamic law) to Europe and North America reinforces this position. Robertson's other statements were indeed uncalled for, and they seem to range from distasteful to reprehensible.

On April 23, however, you received an E-mail that asked NJDC's position on the appearance of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards, and three other Democratic candidates (Richardson, Dodd, and Biden) at Al Sharpton's National Action Network. Al Sharpton is, as described in that E-mail, a prominent racist and anti-Semite. The National Action Network is a hate organization, and arguably a violent one given its role in the Freddy's Fashion Mart arson of 1995. Prior to the actual arson by one of Sharpton's followers, the National Action Network, often led by Mr. Sharpton himself, paraded around the Jewish-owned store while screaming racial and anti-Semitic epithets, along with threats to burn the building down. Sharpton personally used the term "white interloper," and his followers threw in terms like "cracker" and "don't give the Jew a dime." The ensuing arson killed seven people, including a Black security guard whom Sharpton's followers called a "cracker lover."

It is eminently reasonable to compare Sharpton's and the National Action Network's behavioral choices to those of Ku Klux Klansmen who menace a Black-owned business in a white neighborhood, threaten to set it on fire, and then do set it on fire. There is also the matter of the Crown Heights riots, in which Sharpton's mob reenacted the Night of the Broken Glass while yelling "Kill the Jews!" As you know, they did murder a Jew named Yankel Rosenbaum. There are plenty of other examples of Sharpton's hate speech directed at Jews, white people in general, gay people ("Greek homos," which Sharpton claims is not an anti-gay slur), and even Black people (David Dinkins, to whom he applied the N word). While some of Robertson's statements are indeed repugnant, his rhetoric has not played at least an indirect role in fomenting racist and anti-Semitic violence that ended up killing eight people (seven at Freddy's, plus Mr. Rosenbaum).

NJDC has not yet responded to the E-mail inquiry of April 23, but it is reasonable to expect that NJDC will apply the same standards to Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Dodd, Richardson, and Biden that it is applying to Romney. It is also eminently reasonable for the Republican Party to apply NJDC's standards to these individuals, should one be nominated. NJDC should therefore encourage the Democratic Party to find other candidates who are more suitable for our nation's highest position of public trust and responsibility.

Perhaps part of the problem is the National Jewish Democratic Council's own dishonesty and bigotry. We remind our readers that Ira Forman lied to his readers about MoveOn.org knowingly and willfully allowing its now-disgraced Action Forum to serve as a platform for racist, anti-Semitic, and anti-Catholic hate speech, along with 9/11 conspiracy theories wackier than those of Rosie O'Donnell. It is Ira Forman, and not Republicans, who does not let truth and facts get in his way.

Jewish voters should take comfort in knowing that MoveOn.org is not a haven for anti-Semitism and the organization will renounce and remove any postings of the sort. Leave it to Republicans to not allow the truth to get in the way of campaigning.

Sincerely,
Ira Forman
Executive Director
National Jewish Democratic Council

In addition, the National Jewish Democratic Council's "Bubbie" video portrays Christians and Christian symbols (not Republicans, CHRISTIANS) in a "This is the Enemy" context. We have seen so far that NJDC is anti-Semitic for lying to Jews about MoveOn.org's anti-Semitic hate activities. NJDC adds to this its own vicious anti-Semitic propaganda. From Republicans' Elephant in the Living Room comes this beauty:

As for the purportedly common ground between Jews and Christians on American domestic issues, it is narrow indeed. Research by a variety of scholars and pollsters - Ken Wald of the University of Florida, Eric Uslaner and Mark Lichbach of the University of Maryland, the survey released just last week … shows a chasm between American Jews and evangelical Christians on issues ranging from the Iraq war to legal abortion to gay rights. More than identifying the schism on any specific topic, the research describes a visceral distrust, bordering on antipathy, for Evangelical Christians on the part of American Jews. For myself, I find this attitude to be exaggerated, or at least more suited to the past than the present, and yet it is an undeniable political reality. It is the kind of passionate reflex that a political consultant of my acquaintance, who happens to be a Republican, refers to as an “emotional trigger.” And in any campaign, he says, you need to find your side’s emotional trigger to get people out the door to vote.

This statement is clearly designed to damage relations between Jews and evangelical Christians, and it is therefore anti-Semitic. It is, in fact, similar to "Jew as Christian-hater" propaganda that anti-Semites have spewed for centuries to incite pogroms and, most recently, the Holocaust. From “Propaganda and Children during the Hitler Years” by Mary Mills at Nizkor’s Web site,

Drawing on several centuries of anti-semitism, Bauer intensifies her anti-semitic assault by making the virtuous German the object of the Jewish hate. …An example of this concept of the Jew as a Christian-hater occurs in Uncovered Jewry, Or A Thorough And Truthful Report About The Horrible Ways The Hidden Jews Desecrate The Holy Trinity.

It would be one matter if a statement like "a visceral distrust, bordering on antipathy, for Evangelical Christians on the part of American Jews" had come from the Ku Klux Klan or some other white supremacist group, because it could then be written off as white supremacist hate speech. When it comes from a purportedly Jewish organization, however, it becomes believable--just as depictions of Black men as pimps and Black women as "hos" becomes semi-credible when they come from a Black rapper like Snoop Dogg. The proper response, of course, is to write off Snoop Dogg as a low-class entertainer who is no more representative of Black people than NJDC is representative of Jews.

From MoveOn.org: "Judeo-Nazi" leaders of Israel, Talmud a "hateful scripture"

2007-05-07T11:49:00.000-04:00

MoveOn.org Action Forum anti-Semitic hate speech du jour:

You will notice that the Action Forum is still "on vacation" (if you click the URL http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?comment_id=301509 ), and the word for word excerpt we saved before it went online is but one of dozens of reasons. (Don't worry, we will get to MoveOn's equal-opportunity hatred for Catholics, and its derogatory cartoon of the Pope.) It looks like someone didn't take their medications again:

Massacre in Gaza http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/am/publish/article_18657.shtml
By Khalid Amayreh Jun 11, 2006, 14:52
The heart-rending scenes of the Bahr al-Sudaniya massacre in Gaza on Friday, 9 June, shows the Israeli army as it really is, a reptile-Nazi-like army of thugs, hoodlums, and common criminals, not unlike the Gestapo, SS and Wehrmacht.
Indeed, what else can be said about an army that targets with heavy artillery children on an outing along the Gaza beach?
The latest carnage is of course not the first of its kind, and it most certainly won’t be the last. Massacres, after all, have always been Israel’s modus operandi. Israel itself inaugurated its birth with “holy massacres” as Talmudic sages would tell us.
In truth, Zionists have committed more massacres per capita than any other people on earth since Adam and Eve. In fact, one can safely say that wanton killings and massacres are piece and parcel of being Zionist.
I understand that there are Jews who condemn the pornographic slaughter in Gaza, people like Uri Avneri and like-minded Jews. We salute those people, who are our natural partners in the quest for a just and durable peace in Palestine.
However, it is also true that the vast bulk of Israeli Jews are enjoying the killings of Palestinian children and are congratulating each other.
Just take a look at Jewish internet sites in Israel and abroad and see how Jewish youngsters are congratulating each other on the killings of these helpless toddlers in Gaza.
This murderous cannibalism doesn’t come out of the blue. Today in Israel, school curricula are dominated by the Talmud, especially a specific Talmudic text called Shulhan Aruch.
In this text, Jews are commanded to slaughter non-Jews who are viewed more or less as animals or at least lesser human beings.
Of course, Jewish propagandists and apologists would invoke “anti-Semitism” when the truth about the racist, Nazi-like garbage Israeli boys and girls are being taught is exposed through the media.
In fact, if any objective truth-seeker wants to find out why the Israeli army and para-military Jewish terrorists are doing what they are doing to the helpless Palestinians, which is actually nothing less than a slow-motion genocide, one has to go first to the Talmud, the unofficial constitution of Israel. This hateful scripture is Israel’s real Torah as every rabbi would admit.
Today, more than 50% of Israeli army soldiers and high-ranking officers are graduates of Talmudic schools or Yeshivot throughout Israel.
And these graduates go to the army, thoroughly inculcated with this venomous and Nazi-like ideology and value system that indoctrinates them in mass murder and racism and criminality.
Well, what kind of god and religion that sanction the killing of kids playing along the beach in Gaza?
More to the point, it is amply clear that the latest massacre was not the act of one soldier or one officer.
This is a systematic policy of an army that has always murdered and lied about the murder, an army that is concerned more with justifying its crimes than recognizing them and stopping them.
Isn’t Dan Hallutz, the Israeli army chief of staff who ordered the massacre, the same person who in 2002 ordered the Israeli air-force to drop a one-ton bomb on a Gaza apartment building, killing eleven children and many other civilians?
In short, we are dealing with real Nazis, and the truth, however bitter and unpalatable, must be told.
We know the Juedo-Nazi leaders of Israel, along with their cheerleaders in North America, would strive to spread the lie that such wanton acts of bloodshed are “misfires” or “regrettable mistakes.” The less erudite in mendacity and hasbara would probably call the slaughter “collateral damage” as the Americans often refer to their own frequent genocidal episodes in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Unfortunately, such concocted lies still deceive many ordinary people in the West, who breathe, drink and eat Jewish propaganda via their local and national Zionist-controlled media outlets.
Luckily, there are more people who are getting to know the truth about the Nazi nature of Israel and the Nazi-like treatment Palestinians are being subjected to by the children and grandchildren of the holocaust survivors. *
What is really disgraceful, however, is the fact that Europeans, who are relatively freer from the Zionist stranglehold, especially when compared to North Americans, are effectively silent in the face of this Gestapo-like behavior.
European condemnation, and not just verbal condemnation, is very important in this context, since Israel and her criminal leaders would interpret any lukewarm European reaction as a green line to keep up the wanton killings.
We do hope that this latest massacre on the Gaza beach will awaken the conscience of those who still haven’t made up their minds regarding the abomination called Israel.
The Palestinian people realize that European political leaders are reluctant to call the spade a spade because of historical reasons and because of Jewish intimidation.
However, ordinary Europeans, including professional unions, workers unions as well as writers, intellectuals and civic leaders must speak up against Judeo-fascism or Zio-Nazism.
After all Europe can not just atone for one holocaust by allowing Israel and the Jews to commit another holocaust against a helpless people whose only crime is their enduring determination to be free from another Nazi reign of occupation and terror.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/am/publish/article_18657.shtml

[End of quoted material]

10 out of 13 MoveOn.org Action Forum members agree that the Talmud is a "hateful scripture" and Israel is run by "Judeo-Nazis."

Not only that, an official MoveOn.org bulletin by Noah T. Winer supports the positions taken above, although it leaves out the blood libel of Jews and some of the more vicious language. It does cite sources like the Electronic Intifada.

MoveOn.org: Jewish Congressmen more loyal to Israel than the US

2007-05-07T00:24:00.000-04:00

Quote du jour from MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum, still "on vacation" after the scandal of last September-October. Like we said, it will never be brought back online, and here is why.

http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=310537

We need your help in finding a word that is less offensive. One that
describes the Jewish congressmen and Jewish owned media that has a greater allegiance to Israel than the US. And who are demonizing Israel’s neighbors and supporting Israel’s bombing and occupation. Read "Israeli Lobby" google it.

7 of 8 MoveOn.org Action Forum members voted to AGREE with this

MoveOn.org: Iraq war supporters are rural white trash

2007-05-05T11:00:00.000-04:00

http://www.moveon.org/moveonbulletin/bulletin6.html

This article provides an overview of recent polls that show how support for the war is plummeting, and also that the core supporters of war on Iraq are rural, white, male, southern Republicans without a college diploma.

The same page provides links to "tax resistance" resources. Note that it was posted before the war began, and not much later than the ruins of the World Trade Center stopped smoking.

MoveOn.Org Gets More Support from White Nationalist Community

2007-05-05T02:13:00.000-04:00

MoveOn.Org Gets More Support from White Nationalist Community by Rob Taylor at Red Alerts.

This time over the newest anti-war video MoveOn produced, supposedly with help from VoteVets.org. Civic Platform was the first seditious site that jumped on the bandwagon, from whence the Oliver Stone directed video was disseminated through racist forums and all the dark corners of the Internet where those who wish to betray America lurk.
MoveOn has a history of support from White Nationalists so it’s no surprise that various domestic terrorists were waiting with baited breath for some new anti-American propaganda from their fellow anti-Semites. This time I decided to contact MoveOn and ask them if they’d condemn the White nationalists and reject their support: ... I’ll bet I’ll never get a response.

We are sure he will never get a response from MoveOn.org, because he has them red-handed.

MoveOn.org Backs Palestinians against Israel

2007-05-04T15:00:00.000-04:00

Supports Palestinian Right of Return, Blames Israel for Breaking Off Peace Talks, Quotes Electronic Intifada

We came across this through Clifford Lazar's site. It seems that http://www.moveon.org/moveonbulletin/bulletin19.html (MoveOn.org official bulletin by Noah Winer) turned out to be so embarrasing to MoveOn.org that MoveOn.org took it down. Thanks to web.archive.org, however, we can present our readers with highlights of MoveOn.org's official position (they can't blame this one on the Action Forum) about the Palestinians and Israel.

MoveOn Bulletin
Friday, June 20, 2003
Noah T. Winer, Editor
noah.winer "at" moveon.org

Subscribe online at:
http://www.moveon.org/ moveonbulletin/

------------------------------

NOTE: In response to feedback about this bulletin, MoveOn.org would like to clarify that The MoveOn Bulletin is a free weekly collection of links, which represent a broad range of views on important political issues. These links aren't meant to represent the position of MoveOn.org.

We beg to differ. Noah T. Winer is the editor of this bulletin and, as an official representative of MoveOn.org, he is entirely responsible for the content of the page. By posting the indicated links in the context of advocacy as opposed to condemnation, he, and therefore MoveOn.org, are indeed endorsing the indicated positions. In addition, it already seems that MoveOn.org was getting heat over this from pro-Israel people, and the above paragraph shows exactly why MoveOn.org felt compelled to take the bulletin offline. After recovering the material from archive.org, we are hardly surprised. It begins by blaming Israel for breaking off the peace talks:

INTRODUCTION: WHERE DOES THE ROAD MAP LEAD?
In July, 2000 Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak broke off talks with Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat at the Camp David summit hosted by U.S. President Bill Clinton. That September, Ariel Sharon, chairman of the Likud party, made a provocative visit to the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Control over this holy site for both Muslims and Jews is contested by Palestinians and Israelis. The visit implied Israeli sovereignty over all Jerusalem, the eastern portion of which is considered occupied territory by the international community. So began the second intifada, or Palestinian uprising.

As in the first intifada in the late 1980s, the demand is for an end to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem -- which has persisted since 1967 -- and acknowledgment of the Palestinian refugees right to return to the villages from which they were forced to leave during the 1948 war that established the State of Israel. In the 33 months since, human death has saturated the region: 816 Israelis and 2,384 Palestinians have been killed.

Early in his presidency, George W. Bush avoided substantial involvement in the Israel-Palestine conflict. After September 11, 2001 a number of factors -- escalating violence in the area and Israel's attempt to link September 11th with Palestinian suicide bombings, pressure from the Israel lobby and the Christian Right, and the desire for an increasing U.S. influence in the oil-rich Middle East -- prompted Bush to take an active, personal role in promoting an agreement.

That proposed agreement is the Road Map. While the initiative has been praised for calling for an end to violence and for endorsing the formation a Palestinian state, the Road Map provides no mechanism for actually ending the violence, leaves uncertain the borders of the proposed state, and postpones determining the status of the 380,000 Israeli settlers and four million Palestinian refugees. With matters so central to the resolution of the conflict left to be decided at a future date or ignored entirely, the Road Map is still far from being a bona fide peace proposal.

True and lasting peace begins with justice for all the people of the region. That the Road Map will lead in that direction is not at all evident.

CRITIQUE
From the only joint Palestinian-Israeli public policy think-tank in the world:
"The Road Map is severely lacking in detail. It mentions that the sides will have to negotiate the permanent status issues such as borders, Jerusalem, settlements, refugees, etc. but makes almost no mention of these issues throughout the process in the earlier phases."
http://www.ipcri.org/files/roadmapgb.html

From the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz:
"According to the facts on the ground, the [Palestinian] 'state' will apparently be comprised of three enclaves cut off from one another inside the West Bank -- in addition to the Gazan enclave, and with no guarantee the settlements inside the enclave will be dismantled. The 'separation fence' has been described as 'temporary,' but it is a wall with hefty fortifications taking up a lot of land, and it has already scarred the Tul Karm-Qalqiliyah area, the most prosperous Palestinian farmland, thus sabotaging one of the cornerstones of Palestinian economic security."
http://www.moveon.org/r?456

From The Nation:
"For in failing to focus on the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem, about to enter its 37th year, and on Israeli settlements, which underpin that occupation, the Road Map misses an opportunity to end this conflict. Instead, it concentrates on Palestinian violence and how to combat it -- as if it came out of nowhere, and as if, were it to be halted, the situation of occupation and settlement would be normal."
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20030609&s=khalidi

From the Nation: "Blame the Jooooooooooooooz."

FACTS ON THE GROUND: TERRORISM
Human Rights Watch condemns suicide bombing attacks against Israeli civilians as war crimes and crimes against humanity.
http://www.hrw.org/reports/2002/isrl-pa/

Gush Shalom, an Israeli peace group, on the Rantisi assassination attempt.
http://www.gush-shalom.org/archives/article254.html

An Israeli parliament member and 25 former Israeli generals have raised questions about the timing of Sharon's assassination attempt.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0612-05.htm

Senator Dick Lugar (R-Indiana), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has raised the possibility of U.S. military intervention "to root out the terrorism that is at the heart of the problem."
http://www.moveon.org/r?453

Quoting Gush Shalom, are we? Let's digress a bit and show what Gush Shalom supports:

Aims of Gush Shalom

The primary aim of Gush Shalom is to influence Israeli public opinion and lead it towards peace and conciliation with the Palestinian people, based on the following principles:

Putting an end to the occupation,

Accepting the right of the Palestinian people to establish an independent and sovereign State of Palestine in all the territories occupied by Israel in 1967,

...Establishing Jerusalem as the capital of the two states, with East Jerusalem (including the Haram al-Sharif) serving as the capital of Palestine and West Jerusalem (including the Western Wall) serving as the capital of Israel. T

...Recognizing in principle the Right of Return of the Palestinian refugees, allowing each refugee to choose freely between compensation and repatriation to Palestine and Israel, and fixing by mutual agreement the number of refugees who will be able to return to Israel in annual quotas, without undermining the foundations of Israel.

The above is the position of the source that MoveOn.org is promoting, and that of Electronic Intifada (see below) is even worse. Now we return to MoveOn.org's official bulletin by Noah T. Winer.

FACTS ON THE GROUND: OUTPOSTS AND SETTLEMENTS
From the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz:
"Don't make do with the outposts. There are more than 100 of them, and about 60 went up in Sharon's days. If he takes down 7-10 he hasn't done a thing. Many were put up just to pull them out, like a goat from a crowded corral."
http://www.moveon.org/r?454

From The Nation:
"A recent poll by Israel's Jaffee Institute for Strategic Studies shows that 56 percent of Israelis -- up from 48 percent last year -- would 'support a unilateral withdrawal from the territories in the context of a peace accord, even if that meant ceding all settlements.' Here is the signpost for a realistic road map that could be charted by the Bush Administration."
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20030630&s=carey

This is the "realistic road map" that MoveOn.org seems to support.

FACTS ON THE GROUND: THE SEPARATION WALL
Gush Shalom reports that the separation wall Israel is constructing in the West Bank is not at all along the internationally recognized 1967 "green line" border. The wall, officially being built for security, annexes illegal settlements into Israel.
http://www.gush-shalom.org/thewall/

A troubling report on the 25-foot tall separation wall from Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronot describes how the system of barbed concrete walls and armed watchtowers will imprison hundreds of thousands of Palestinians without access to their agricultural lands.
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article1546.shtml

The Palestinian Society for the Protection of Human Rights and the Environment on legal efforts to block the wall.
http://www.lawsociety.org/Press/Preleases/2002/oct/oct15e.html

Res ipsa loquitur, the thing speaks for itself. In the above MoveOn.org bulletin, edited by Noah T. Winer, MoveOn.org endorses the following positions:
(1) Israel is responsible for breaking off the peace talks
(2) The "occupation" is responsible for the Palestinians' violent behavioral choices
(3) The security wall is bad and "imprisons" Palestinians
(4) Israel should cede the settlements unilaterally
(5) The Palestinians have a "right of return"
(6) MoveOn.org promotes positions taken by Gush Shalom and the Electronic Intifada (the same organization that accused Israel of "murdering" Rachel Corrie)

This is hardly inconsistent with Mr. Winer's bulletin that accuses "Zionists" of divided loyalties--a smear also quite common on MoveOn's disgraced Action Forum--while citing a known anti-Semitic source (Christison).

PAX ISRAELICA?
Nearly all PNAC participants, whether Jewish or Christian, are right-wing Zionists who support Ariel Sharon's Likud Party. In 1996, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and others drafted a paper for incoming Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urging him to make "a clean break" from the Oslo peace process preferring "peace through strength," including the ouster of Saddam Hussein.
http://www.israeleconomy.org/strat1.htm

This essay describes many of the familiar neo-conservatives as having "dual loyalties," making policy decisions in the interests of the State of Israel as much as the United States.
http://www.counterpunch.org/christison1213.html

Res ipsa loquitur, the thing speaks for itself.

MoveOn.org Quote Du Jour: U.S. and Israel are "war criminal states"

2007-05-04T11:52:00.000-04:00

This is what MoveOn.org's people say about the United States as well as Israel. The writer says the terrorists who are murdering our soldiers are "resisting occupation." Note that 14 of the 15 MoveOn people who rated this posting voted to agree with it. Our comments are in brackets.
========================

Israel’s ‘UNINTENDED’ ??? collateral damage in Lebanon Unintended for crisake. They bombed the whole country back to the Stone Age. It is A WAR CRIME for which Nazis were hung. If I were Bush I would not plan any European vacations. http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=9616 Bush Goes Retro to Avoid Prosecution - by Paul Craig RobertsWhen I was a kid, John Wayne war movies gave us the message that America was the good guy, the white hat that fought the villain. Alas, today the U.S. and its last remaining non-coerced ally, Israel, are almost universally regarded as the bad guys over whom John Wayne would triumph. Today, the U.S. and Israel are seen throughout the world as war-criminal states....President Bush maintains that Israel has “a right to protect itself” by destroying Lebanon.Bush blocked the attempt to stop Israel’s aggression and is, thereby, equally responsible for the war crimes. Indeed, a number of reports claim that Bush instigated the Israeli aggression against Lebanon.Bush has other war crime problems. Benjamin Ferencz, a chief prosecutor of Nazi war crimes at Nuremberg, recently said that President Bush should be tried as a war criminal side-by-side with Saddam Hussein for starting aggressive wars, Hussein for his 1990 invasion of Kuwait and Bush for his 2003 invasion of Iraq. Under the Nuremberg standard, Bush is definitely a war criminal. [Didn't Genghis John the Khan Kerry say that he, Kerry, was a war criminal?] The U.S. Supreme Court also exposed Bush to war crimes charges under both the U.S. War Crimes Act of 1996 and the Geneva Conventions when the Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld against the Bush administration’s military tribunals and inhumane treatment of detainees.…According to President Bush, the U.S. will lose the “war on terror” unless the U.S. succeeds in defeating “the Iraqi terrorists” by establishing “democracy in Iraq.” Of course, insurgents resisting occupation are not terrorists, and there were no insurgents or terrorists in Iraq until Bush invaded. [Michael Moore’s position, the terrorists who are murdering our troops with improvised explosive devices are “freedom fighters.”] …

14 out of 15 MoveOn.org Action Forum participants voted to AGREE with this

MoveOn.org Action Forum: "Why are Jews so Jew-y?"

2007-05-04T01:40:00.000-04:00

This is a word-for-word statement from MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum, in which MoveOn's moderators exercised editorial control in favor of this form of commentary.

Why are the Jews so Jew-y? Norwegian novelist Jostein Gaarder breaks the ultimate taboo in an anti-Israel rant by tying the irrationality of Israeli violence to Judaism (the link is to an unofficial translation, which starts as follows):“There is no turning back. It is time to learn a new lesson: We do no longer recognize the state of Israel. We could not recognize the South African apartheid regime, nor did we recognize the Afghan Taliban regime. Then there were many who did not recognize Saddam Hussein’s Iraq or the Serbs’ ethnic cleansing. We must now get used to the idea: The state of Israel in its current form is history.We do not believe in the notion of God’s chosen people. We laugh at this people’s fancies and weep over its misdeeds. To act as God’s chosen people is not only stupid and arrogant, but a crime against humanity. We call it racism. There are limits to our patience, and there are limits to our tolerance. We do not believe in divine promises as justification for occupation and apartheid. We have left the Middle Ages behind. We laugh uneasily at those who still believe that the God of flora, fauna, and galaxies has selected one people in particular as his favorite and given it funny stone tablets, burning bushes, and a license to kill. We call child murderers ‘child murderers’ and will never accept that such have a divine or historic mandate excusing their outrages. We say but this: Shame on all apartheid, shame on ethnic cleansing, shame on every terrorist strike against civilians, be it carried out by Hamas, Hizballah, or the state of Israel!”
…The Israelis are stealing their land, and have occupied land that is not theirs for years. And they OWN Washington senators and congresspeople.

29 of 30 MoveOn.org Action Forum participants voted to AGREE with this

MoveOn.org Action Forum: Democrat Tom Lantos is a "whining, arrogant Jew"

2007-05-02T23:49:00.000-04:00

This will be the first of a series of statements from MoveOn.org's disgraced Action Forum, in which MoveOn's moderators exercised editorial control in favor of the commentary like the one shown here. Remember that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton take the Jewish vote for granted, so it was OK for them to appear at a MoveOn.org function and then to consort with Al Sharpton's hate organization, the National Action Network.*

Congressman Tom Lantos told PM Olmert of Israel that he wants to freeze the $ 230 million U.S. aid package to Lebanon. Lantos is the ranking democrat on the House Foreign Relations Comte. Lantos said, "The [Lebanese] aid package should be witheld until the Lebanese government displays responsibility". Responsibility ? Israel is guilty of war crimes in their cowardely attack on Lebanon and the whining, arrogant Jew wants Lebanon to demonstrate responsibility ! This is another example of how many Jews/Zioniosts in our Congress use the U.S. for their own greedy purposes. DUMP ISRAEL.

14 out of 17 MoveOn.org Action Forum participants voted to AGREE with this.

* Per "Democrats Embrace Impresario of Hatred" by Fred Siegel,

Picketers from Mr. Sharpton's National Action Network, sometimes joined by "the Rev." himself, marched daily outside the store, screaming about bloodsucking Jews" and "Jew bastards" and threatening to burn the building down. After weeks of increasingly violent rhetoric, one of the protesters, Roland Smith, took Mr. Sharpton's words about ousting the "white interloper" to heart. He ran into the store shouting, "It's on!" He shot and wounded three whites and a Pakistani, whom he apparently mistook for a Jew. Then he set the fire, which killed five Hispanics, one Guyanese and one African-American--a security guard whom protesters had taunted as a "cracker lover." Smith then fatally shot himself.

Republicans Own the National Jewish Democratic Council

2007-04-27T12:54:00.000-04:00

It is far from surprising that the National Jewish Democratic Council has not responded to our'>http://www.israpundit.com/2006/?p=4527">our E-mail asking it to condemn the appearance of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Chris Dodd, Joe Biden, and Bill Richardson at Al Sharpton's anti-Semitic and racist hate organization, the National Action Network. The NJDC has painted itself into a corner or, to use another expression, "it has us exactly where we want them." This article will show why the NJDC has rendered itself worse than irrelevent to the 2008 elections; it has actually become a Republican asset.
The National Jewish Democratic Council has been as diligent and creative as any medieval Inquisitor or witch-hunter at finding reasons to condemn Republican candidates as racists and/or anti-Semites. By doing so, however, it has set standards by which Democratic candidates can even more easily be denounced as racists and anti-Semites. Not only that, as the standards were set by a Democratic organization, the Democrats in question are being judged not by our standards but by their own.
As an example, NJDC spokesman Steve Rabin posted a blog entry that accused John McCain of using a "racial slur" because he used the phrase "tar baby." If Rabin knew anything about Uncle Remus' folk tales (or didn't knowingly and willfully choose to ignore what he knew of them just so he could slime a Navy aviator whose shoes he is not fit to kiss), he would realize that the Tar Baby is not black because it is a Negro, it is black because it is--well, made of TAR. Brer Fox, the archetypical Trickster of many folk tales, makes a figure out of this sticky substance to trap his enemy Brer Rabbit. Brer Rabbit takes offense when the inanimate Tar Baby doesn't answer his greeting, so he punches it and gets stuck. When the Tar Baby won't release him, he hits it again and gets stuck even deeper in the mess.
In any event, by grasping at this straw to call McCain a racist, while condemning Mitt Romney for speaking at the Henry Ford Museum, the National Jewish Democratic Council has gotten itself stuck to the so-called Reverend Al Sharpton. While Brer Rabbit's nemesis was made of tar, Sharpton is best described as what one would get by mixing the most offensive imaginable kinds of garbage (stinking to high heaven of racist, anti-Semitic, and other forms of hate speech) with flypaper, Superglue, and whatever sticky material lines certain mouse traps. Here is NJDC's" official statement about Mitt Romney's speech at the Henry Ford Museum.

National Jewish Democratic Council Decries Mitt Romney's Embrace of Henry Ford
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: David Goldenberg
February 12, 2007
Washington, DC - The National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC) expressed its deep concerns today about Republican Mitt Romney's decision to announce his candidacy for President from the Henry Ford Museum in Detroit, Michigan....
"NJDC is deeply troubled by Governor Romney's choice of locations to announce his Presidential campaign. Romney has been traveling the country talking about inclusiveness and understanding of people from all walks of life. Yet he chooses to kick his presidential campaign on the former estate of a well-known and outspoken anti-Semite and xenophobe. Mitt Romney's embrace of Henry Ford and association of Ford's legacy with his presidential campaign raises serious questions about either the sincerity of Romney's words or his understanding of basic American history," said NJDC Executive Director Ira Forman.

Perhaps Ira Forman thought he could get in a cheap shot at Romney by criticizing him for making a speech at the museum of a long dead EX-antisemite (noting that Ford retracted, repudiated, and apologized for The International Jew). Like a chess player who cannot think even one move ahead, though, he destroyed his own organization's credibility while setting the stage for an unprecedented electoral disaster next year. If speaking at the museum of a long-dead EX-antisemite makes a person unfit to be President, which is where Ira Forman has set the bar, then it is pretty clear that Barack Obama is not fit to hold any position of responsibility or public trust whatsoever:
The prominent racist and anti-Semite with whom Barack Obama is having such a blissful time is, unlike Henry Ford, living, breathing, and unrepentent. Unlike Ford (and Mel Gibson and Don Imus), Al Sharpton has never apologized, nor has he ever tried to make matters right with the people he harmed in Wappingers Falls NY (Tawana Brawley scandal), Crown Heights (murder of Yankel Rosenbaum by a Sharptonite mob yelling "Kill the Jew!"), or Harlem (arson of Freddy's Fashion Mart, which killed seven people including a Black security guard whom Sharpton's National Action Network called a "cracker lover.")
Al Sharpton is also the last person in the world to be talking about Don Imus' use of "ho," noting that his racist hate group called the Central Park rape victim, a white woman who was also beaten to a pulp by her attackers, a "whore." Sharpton personally called Mayor David Dinkins a "nigger whore turning tricks in City Hall," which seems downright ungrateful in light of Dinkins' police force allowing Sharpton's gang to reenact the Night of the Broken Glass in Crown Heights. To these delightful expressions of tolerance for people of other races and ethnicities (and even those of his own), Sharpton has added, "“White folks was in caves while we was building empires ... We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”
If we were to take the above photograph and invert the colors, we would have a Caucasian candidate standing arm in arm with the Aryan Nations' and White Aryan Resistance's Tom Metzger. Tom Metzger's hate organization was found civilly liable for inciting the racist murder of an Ethiopian immigrant. Sharpton's National Action Network, the same group that Obama, Clinton, and the other candidates visited, was indirectly responsible for at least seven: the people who died when one of Sharpton's followers set Freddy's Fashion Mart on fire. If the National Action Network was the group that reenacted the Night of the Broken Glass in Crown Heights while yelling "Kill the Jew," the body count rises to eight by adding Yankel Rosenbaum. Sharpton personally used the term "diamond merchants" to refer to Crown Heights' Jewish population.

It is now easy to see how the Republicans OWN the National Jewish Democratic Council. The six Democrats who attended the National Action Network can be rightfully denounced as racists and anti-Semites--not by Republican standards but by NJDC standards. Hillary Clinton reputedly called a campaign worker a "f***ing Jew bastard" and, given her patronage of Sharpton's anti-Semitic and racist hate group, this story becomes far more believable. Stories about Barack Obama attending a madrassa (maybe they don't like Jews there either) and associating with a Black separatist minister (i.e. the kind that hates "crackers," to use National Action Network terminology) also become far more believable.
The statement "Judge not, lest ye be judged" is well illustrated by this passage from King Henry V. Henry V, the "Star of England," is among our favorite role models, and we can easily apply this to NJDC's condemnation of Mitt Romney. Scroop, Cambridge, and Grey are traitors who have plotted against the King's life. They do not yet know that Henry V has discovered their treason.

KING HENRY V
Uncle of Exeter, Enlarge [release from prison] the man committed yesterday, That rail'd against our person: we consider it was excess of wine that set him on; And on his more advice we pardon him.

That is, the King forgives a man who had insulted him while drunk. The three traitors seek to ingratiate themselves with the King by demanding harsh punishment for the soldier, much as the National Jewish Democratic Council has demanded a political "death sentence" for Mitt Romney, John McCain, and Tommy Thompson.

SCROOP
That's mercy, but too much security: Let him be punish'd, sovereign, lest example Breed, by his sufferance, more of such a kind.
KING HENRY V
O, let us yet be merciful.
CAMBRIDGE
So may your highness, and yet punish too.
GREY
Sir, You show great mercy, if you give him life, After the taste of much correction.
KING HENRY V
Alas, your too much love and care of me Are heavy orisons 'gainst this poor wretch! If little faults, proceeding on distemper, Shall not be wink'd at, how shall we stretch our eye When capital crimes, chew'd, swallow'd and digested, Appear before us?

In this case, Mitt Romney, John McCain, and Tommy Thompson committed, at the very worst, minor gaffes. Our position is that Romney and McCain did absolutely nothing wrong, while Thompson's well-meaning effort to compare "Jewish tradition" to the Protestant work ethic went over the wrong way. We did not find it offensive, but perhaps it could have been phrased differently. Now we have Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and the rest of the Democratic Presidential candidates (except apparently for Krazy Kucinich) consorting with the Black counterpart of the White Aryan Resistance: Al Sharpton's National Action Network.
When the three traitors are exposed as such before the King, they immediately confess and beg for their lives. Henry V condemns them to death with these words:

KING HENRY V
The mercy that was quick in us but late, By your own counsel is suppress'd and kill'd: You must not dare, for shame, to talk of mercy; For your own reasons turn into your bosoms, As dogs upon their masters, worrying you.

The National Jewish Democratic Council has set the standards under which a candidate can be condemned as a racist and/or anti-Semite. Now the entire Democratic Party will have to live with the consequences--unless a Democrat like Joe Lieberman ("Jew Lieberman" to MoveOn.org), someone who has never dirtied his hands through contact with Tom Metzger's Black clone, steps in to capture the nomination. Noting that Lieberman is the one Democrat who did not just vote to knife our Armed Forces in the back by telling the enemy when he could expect them to leave Iraq, he will also have credibility on the national security issue.

Hillary Clinton looks under the White House's rugs

2007-04-26T20:55:00.000-04:00

Hillary Clinton, while trying to fake a Southern accent, pondered what she might find when she looks under the rugs in the White House during her first day in office. We suspect she will find Bill Clinton's used condoms (none used on her, of course), because Laura Bush never dared to turn those rugs over for fear of being grossed out.

Seen on the Internet: Hillary Clinton has more skeletons in her closet than Joseph Stalin had in the Katyn Forest.

Q: What does Bill Clinton do after a night of hot sex?
A: Goes home to Hillary.

Are Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama anti-Semites?

2007-04-25T13:57:00.000-04:00

Barack Obama's and Hillary Clinton's recent attendance of Al Sharpton's National Action Network raises some disturbing questions, especially given allegations about Clinton's past record of making anti-Semitic statements. Jews Divided on Hillary Slur reports an allegation that, in 1974, she called Bill Clinton's campaign manager Paul Fray, whom she apparently blamed for losing a Congressional race for her husband, a "f**king Jew bastard." Meanwhile, stories about Obama's attendance at a madrasa, and his connection with a Black separatist minister, take on added seriousness in light of his recent visit to Al Sharpton's racist and anti-Semitic hate group.

Under standards set, not by Republican critics with an axe to grind but by the National Jewish Democratic Council itself, Clinton, Obama, and also Bill Richardson, Joe Biden, Chris Dodd, and John Edwards, have disqualified themselves as candidates and should drop out of the race.

Here is what the National Jewish Democratic Council said about Mitt Romney's decision to make a speech at the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, where we had our own picture taken in a Model T to go with a book we published.

NJDC Decries Mitt Romney's Embrace of Henry Ford
February 12, 2007

Location of Presidential Announcement Suggests Romney Needs American and Jewish Histories 101

Washington, DC - The National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC) expressed its deep concerns today about Republican Mitt Romney's decision to announce his candidacy for President from the Henry Ford Museum in Detroit, Michigan. Located on grounds formerly owned by Ford, the museum is a testament to the life of Henry Ford, a notorious anti-Semite and xenophobe whose belief that Jews were second-class, inferior citizens were expressed in detail in his writings on his theory of Americanization. Ford was also bestowed with the Grand Service Cross of the Supreme Order of the German Eagle by Adolf Hitler.

"NJDC is deeply troubled by Governor Romney's choice of locations to announce his Presidential campaign. Romney has been traveling the country talking about inclusiveness and understanding of people from all walks of life. Yet he chooses to kick off his presidential campaign on the former estate of a well-known and outspoken anti-Semite and xenophobe. Mitt Romney's embrace of Henry Ford and association of Ford's legacy with his presidential campaign raises serious questions about either the sincerity of Romney's words or his understanding of basic American history," said NJDC Executive Director Ira Forman.

While we obviously did not care for two or three pages in Ford's My Life and Work that talked about Jews, we also note that Ford later repudiated, retracted, and apologized for his promotion of The International Jew. Furthermore, contrary to NJDC's implication that Ford received the Order of the German Eagle for promoting anti-Semitism, it was actually given in recognition of the industrial achievements that made the United States the wealthiest and most powerful nation on earth. Finally, Ford had been dead for close to sixty years when Romney appeared at the Ford Museum.

Since the National Jewish Democratic Council has effectively said that Mitt Romney disqualified himself by speaking at the museum of a long dead EX-antisemite, we are confident that it will soon issue a statement asking for Democratic candidates to step forward as alternatives to the six who are currently running. All six appeared at the conference of a living and active racist and anti-Semitic hate organization, the very same organization that chanted phrases like "bloodsucking Jews," "Jew bastards," "white interloper," and "cracker lover" before one of its members torched a Jewish-owned store and killed seven people.

Here are pictures of Barack Obama arm in arm with the same living and unrepentent racist and anti-Semite who personally called the owner of Freddy's Fashion Mart a "white interloper" while referring to the Jews of Crown Heights as "diamond merchants." Sharpton's mob, meanwhile, yelled "Kill the Jews!" as one of its members knifed Yankel Rosenbaum to death. This suggests that Obama does not like Jews, and it is quite likely (given his alleged connections with a Black separatist minister) that he does not like white Gentiles either.

To put matters another way, how would most African-Americans feel if a white candidate appeared in the following context with the Ku Klux Klan's David Duke or the White Aryan Resistance's Tom Metzger? They would probably conclude that said candidate was a white supremacist and a racist, and they would almost certainly be right.

Barack Obama with his arm around a prominent racist and anti-Semite.

Barack Obama with the Black clone of the Aryan Nations' Tom Metzger. (YouTube video of Al Sharpton and Tom Metzger.) Sharpton's hate speech, like Metzger's, was indirectly responsible for fatal acts of violence.

No one is interested in Clinton's, Obama's, or the other candidates' excuse that "we need the Black vote." Racist and anti-Semitic demagogues appeal universally to the absolute dregs of the societies they claim to represent. Duke and Metzger appeal to the lowest class of Caucasian Gentile. Al Sharpton similarly appeals to Black people who, if they woke up one day to find that they had become white people, would be cutting holes in their pillowcases and trying on sheets by noon. By nightfall, they would be burning crosses, lynching Negroes, and firebombing Black churches the way Sharpton's people burned Freddy's Fashion Mart. If that is the kind of "Black vote" that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama want, then no decent American of any race or ethnicity should want any part of them.

Meanwhile, given the National Jewish Democratic Council's on-the-record statement about Mitt Romney making a speech at the Henry Ford Museum, it will be impossible for NJDC to give any of these six Democrats credible support next year. If NJDC tries to do so, its statement about Romney will be placed side by side with Sharpton's track record to discredit it at every turn. In fact, the standard it has set for Romney is already being used against Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Biden, Dodd, and Richardson. This shows that there is indeed some wisdom in the Christian statement, "Judge not, lest ye be judged." We also recall the scene from King Henry V in which three traitors, who do not know that the king has discovered their treachery, urge the king to give the harshest punishment to a man who insulted the king while drunk (much as Mel Gibson spewed anti-Semitic remarks while drunk). Upon being denounced as traitors, they ask for mercy only to have King Henry reject them with these words:

The mercy that was quick in us but late,
By your own counsel is suppress'd and kill'd:
You must not dare, for shame, to talk of mercy;
For your own reasons turn into your bosoms,
As dogs upon their masters, worrying you.

NJDC should be aware that Henry V is among our favorite role models, and its "reasons" why Mitt Romney disqualified himself by appearing at the Ford museum have similarly turned on NJDC. This will be a disaster given the Democratic Party's purported reliance on the Jewish vote. If the Democrats insist on running Clinton, Obama, Edwards, or any of the others, the Republican Party will have to order several packages of elephant trunks for former Jewish Democrats. Additional elephant trunks will be needed for decent African-Americans who are outraged by the suggestion that the Black clone of Tom Metzger can "deliver their votes.

In closing, we recall Coleridge's "Rime of the Ancient Mariner," and it appears as though Barack Obama has hung the Sharpton-tross, stinking to high heaven of racist and anti-Semitic hate speech along with the Tawana Brawley scandal, around his own neck:

Barack Obama and the Sharpton-Tross

2007-04-23T21:56:00.000-04:00

The shipmates, in their sore distress, would fain throw the whole guilt on the ancient Mariner : in sign whereof they hang the dead sea-bird round his neck.

Ah ! well a-day ! what evil looks
Had I from old and young !
Instead of the cross, the Albatross
About my neck was hung.

Barack Obama has saved his shipmates the trouble by hanging the Sharpton-tross (stinking to high heaven of racist and anti-Semitic hate speech) around his own neck.

Barack Obama's Running Mate, Al Sharpton = David Duke

2007-04-23T17:05:00.000-04:00

Barack Obama, who supports partial birth infanticide despite the ban's explicit exception for abortions to protect the life of the mother, appears on stage with his racist and anti-Semitic running mate Al Sharpton. Click on the image to see Sharpton morph into a Ku Klux Klansman while talking about Jews, white people, Italians, gays, and even Black people he doesn't like.